I rent the top half of a duplex.

When I came home yesterday, I saw that my land lord had put a big pro-Kerry sign in the grass in front of the house.

Should I destroy it?

Either put up a Bush/Cheney sign or move out.

Awww I thought this was gonna be another pooper thread.  On that note, smear it with poo!

Dont destroy it, it only takes you down to their level.

Put a 3'x5' Bush 2004 sign on the side of your car, so he cant complain about you defacing his property.

If I didn't have a lease, I'd move out. (... and not just because of the political sign ... the guy is possibly the most annoying person I've ever shared a wall with.)


I like the idea of a big Bush-Cheney sign, but my truck parks behind the house so it wouldn't be visible.

I could put one in the window. He'll probably complain about it though.


Anyone know where I can get a large Bush-Cheney sign?

put a big Bush/Cheney sign next to it and a nader '04 sign in the midle

Quoted: I rent the top half of a duplex. When I came home yesterday, I saw that my land lord had put a big pro-Kerry sign in the grass in front of the house. Should I destroy it?

Go with the flow.....................

Before the morally just arfcom army gets in here, I'm gonna say "Hide it!!!!"

Or you could spray-paint "F*** the Pope" on it in large letters with pink paint.  Landlord will take it down himself.

Target practice?

Oh, I know. Take some bologna, cut it up so it spells "BUSH/CHENEY 2004", and put it on his car.

i would put a Bush sign in your window.  what can he do?  legally i don't think he can tell you to take it down.  

Stuff it in his pooper .....

I'd go with a window sign.

Quoted: Stuff it in his pooper .....

Quoted: Or you could spray-paint "F*** the Pope" on it in large letters with pink paint.  Landlord will take it down himself.

put it in the window,,,,,  what can he do,??? legally not much,,, worse thing  that could happen next year,,he wont re-new yer lease..

Ask the landlord if he was aware that some fucktard had put up a John Kerry sign in his yard.

Quoted: Ask the landlord if he was aware that some fucktard had put up a John Kerry sign in his yard.

I did this when I got home just a little bit ago.

He was out in the back yard getting on his motorcycle. I parked, and as I walked past on my way into the house said "Hey, did you see that some dumb shit put a sign up in your front yard?". He stood there without saying anything for a bit, then said "It was me". I said, "Jeeze, are you on crack". He goes "We've got to get rid of these guys, this economy is horrible".

I just shook my head and went inside. Round 2 will come when I can find a couple of nice Bush-Cheney signs for the windows.

Quoted: Quoted: Ask the landlord if he was aware that some fucktard had put up a John Kerry sign in his yard.

I did this when I got home just a little bit ago. He was out in the back yard getting on his motorcycle. I parked, and as I walked past on my way into the house said "Hey, did you see that some dumb shit put a sign up in your front yard?". He stood there without saying anything for a bit, then said "It was me". I said, "Jeeze, are you on crack". He goes "We've got to get rid of these guys, this economy is horrible". I just shook my head and went inside. Round 2 will come when I can find a couple of nice Bush-Cheney signs for the windows.

\80 percent of the USA feels like he does............ chill whatever you do will not make a bit of difference.

Give the sign some antifreeze...

Put the Bush sign right in front of it.

Quoted: Quoted: Ask the landlord if he was aware that some fucktard had put up a John Kerry sign in his yard. I did this when I got home just a little bit ago. He was out in the back yard getting on his motorcycle. I parked, and as I walked past on my way into the house said "Hey, did you see that some dumb shit put a sign up in your front yard?". He stood there without saying anything for a bit, then said "It was me". I said, "Jeeze, are you on crack". He goes "We've got to get rid of these guys, this economy is horrible". I just shook my head and went inside. Round 2 will come when I can find a couple of nice Bush-Cheney signs for the windows.

I would put up window signs but also put up a yard sign.  If you have a lease you have a right to put up the sign.

Soak it in lighter fluid then use a Cigarette and a pack of matches as a time fuse .

When you see it flare up , wait till its almost out . Then run downstairs and piss on it to put it out

Now that he knows where you stand it's a bad idea to get rid of or deface it.

Just put up your signs, and while you're at it look into whether you have the right to put up your own sign.  If you find it print out a copy of it and tape it to the back of the sign.

Prepare not to be renewed.

Quoted: Now that he knows where you stand it's a bad idea to get rid of or deface it. Just put up your signs, and while you're at it look into whether you have the right to put up your own sign.  If you find it print out a copy of it and tape it to the back of the sign. Prepare not to be renewed.

Yeah, I decided not to destroy the thing before I gave him shit about it.

As for not be renewed, no worries there ... in fact, if I'd break the lease and move three doors down just to get away from the guy.

As the old saying goes, Money is the root of all evil ..... Most Kerry supporters are only concerned about themselves, there money and what they can get from the guberment for free.  They are all ignorant to the future and what is heading our way.  Alot of these people claim to be christians and religious folk but totaly ignore the warnings of the same bible they say they read, support and beieve in.  Look up the company Mondex .. One day you will be all to familiar with them since they arethe ones who deighned and made the implantable grain of rice size implant chip.  Most people are also ignorant to the fact that according to the bible, all the places that are referred to in the bible are places in the middle east, the same place that the shit has been hitting the fan for decades. Many  negative things listed in the article below would fall into place if Kerry took office..Draw your own conclusions..................


THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THE GREAT CALIPHATE
by Larry Abraham, January 29, 2004

Watching and listening to the Democrat Party candidates is
tantamount to enduring the Chinese water torture.
The blah, blah, blah goes on and on and nothing of value comes
out except the pain of listening to the same nothingness
over and over again. I won't take the time or space
to repeat what you have heard so many mind numbing times
but what you have not heard is crucial.

President Bush and his administration spokesmen are not telling the
American people what they really need to know about this "war." If
they don't do that between now and November it may cost them the
election.

The war against terror did not begin on September 11, 2001, nor will
it end with the peaceful transition to civilian authority in Iraq,
whenever that may be. In fact, Iraq is but a footnote in the bigger
context of this encounter, but an important one none the less.

This war is what the Jihadists themselves are calling the "Third
Great Jihad." They are operating within the framework of a time line
which reaches back to the very creation of Islam in the seventh century
and are presently attempting to recreate the dynamics which gave
rise to the religion in the first two hundred years of its existence.

No religion in history grew as fast, in its infancy, and the reason! s
for the initial growth of Islam are not hard to explain when you
understand what the world was like at the time of Muhammad's
death in 632 AD. Remember that the Western Roman Empire was
in ruins and the Eastern Empire, based in Constantinople,
was trying desperately to keep the power of its early grandeur
while transitioning to Christianity as a de facto state religion.
The costs to the average person were large as he was
being required to meet the constantly rising taxes levied by the
state along with the tithes coerced by the Church.

What Islam offered was the "carrot or the sword". If you became a
convert, your taxes were immediately eliminated, as was your tithe.
If you didn't, you faced death. The choice was not hard for most to
make, unless you were a very devoted martyr in the making. At the
beginning, even the theology was not too hard for most to swallow,
considering that both Jewry and Christianity were given their due
by the Prophet.

There is but one God-Allah, and Muhammad is His Prophet,
as was Jesus, and the pre-Christian Jewish prophets of the Torah
(Old Testament). Both were called "children of the book"--
the book being the Koran, which replaced both the Old and New
Testaments for former Christians and Jews.

With this practical approach to spreading the "word" Islam grew like
wild-fire, reaching out from the Saudi Arabian Peninsula in! a ll
directions. This early growth is what the Muslims call the "First"
great Jihad and it met with little resistance until Charles Martel of
France, the father of Charlemagne, stopped them in the battle of Tours
in France after they had firmly established Islam on the Iberian Peninsula.

This first onslaught against the West continued in various forms and at
various times until Islam was finally driven out of Spain in 1492 at
the battle of Granada.

The "Second great jihad" came with the Ottoman Turks. This empire
succeeded in bringing about the downfall of Constantinople as a
Christian stronghold and an end to Roman hegemony in all of its forms.
The Ottoman Empire was Islam's most successful expansion of territory
even though the religion itself had fractured into warring sects and bitter
rivalries with each claiming the ultimate truths in "the ways of the Prophet".

By 1683 the Ottomans had suffered a series of defeats on both land and
sea and the final, unsuccessful attempt to capture Vienna set the stage
for the collapse of any further territorial ambitions and Islam shrunk
into various sheikhdoms, emir dominated principalities, and roving
tribes of nomads. However, by this time a growing anti-western sentiment,
blaming its internal failures on anyone but themselves, was taking hold
and setting the stage for a new revival known as Wahhabism, a sect which
came into full bloom under the H! ouse of Saud on the Arabian Peninsula
shortly before the onset of WWI. It is this Wahhabi version of Islam
which has infected the religion itself, now finding adherents in almost all
branches and sects, especially the Shiites.

Wahhabiism calls for the complete and total rejection or destruction
of anything and everything which is not based in the original teachings
of The Prophet and finds its most glaring practice in the policies of
the Afghani Taliban or the Shiite practices of the late Ayatollah
Khomeini in Iran. Its Ali Pasha (Field Marshall) is now known as
Osama bin Laden, the leader of the "Third Jihad", who is Wahhabi
as were his 9/11 attack teams, 18 of which were also Saudi.

The strategy for this "holy war" did not begin with the planning of
the destruction of the World Trade Center. It began with the toppling of
the Shah of Iran back in the late 1970's. With his plans and programs to
"westernize" his country, along with his close ties to the U.S. and
subdued acceptance of the State of Israel, the Shah was the soft target.

Remember "America Held Hostage"?

Thanks, in large part to the hypocritical and disastrous policies of
the Jimmy Carter State Department, the revolution was set into
motion, the Shah was deposed, his armed forces scattered or murdered
and stage one was complete. The Third Jihad now had a base of
operations and the oil wealth to support its grand design or w! hat
they call the "Great Caliphate".

What this design calls for is the replacement of all secular
leadership in any country with Muslim majorities. This would include,
Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, all the Emirates, Sudan, Tunisia,
Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Malaysia,
Indonesia and finally what they call the "occupied territory" Israel.

As a part of this strategy, forces of the jihad will infiltrate
governments and the military as a prelude to taking control, once
the secular leadership is ousted or assassinated. Such was the case in
Lebanon leading to the Syrian occupation and in Egypt with the
murder of Anwar Sadat, along with the multiple attempts on the lives of
Hussein in Jordan, Mubarak of Egypt and Musharraf in Pakistan.
Pakistan is a particular prize because of its nuclear weapons.
(Please note al Qaeda call for the Islamic-militant overthrow of
Musharraf in Pakistan on March 25.

The long-range strategy of the Third Jihad counts on three strategic
goals. First, the U.S. withdrawing from the region just as it did in
Southeast Asia, following Vietnam. Second, taking control of the oil
wealth in the Muslim countries, which would be upwards to 75% of
known reserves; third, using nuclear weapons or other WMDs to annihilate
Israel. A further outcome of successfully achieving these objectives
would be to place the United Nations as the! sole ar biter in East/West
negotiations and paralyze western resistance, leading to total withdrawal
from all Islamic dominated countries

Evidence of the Bush Administration awareness of this plan is found
in the events immediately following the 9/11 attack. The
administration's first move was to shore up Pakistan and Egypt,
believing that these two would be the next targets for al Qaeda,
while Americans focused on the disaster in New York.
The administration also knew that the most important objective
was to send a loud and clear message that the U.S. was in the
region to stay, not only to shore up our allies but to send a message
to the Jihadists.

The attack on Afghanistan was necessary to break-up a secure al
Qaeda base of operations and put their leadership on the run or in
prison. The war in Iraq also met a very strategic necessity in that no one
knew how much collaboration existed between Saddam Hussein
and the master planners of the Third Jihad or Hussein's willingness
to hand off WMDs to terrorist groups including the PLO in Israel.
What was known were serious indications of on-going collaboration
as Saddam funneled money to families of suicide bombers attacking
the Israelis and others in Kuwait.

What the U.S. needed to establish was a significant base of operations
smack dab in the middle of the Islamic world, in a location which effectively
cut it in half. Iraq was the ideal target for this and a host of other strategic reasons.

Leadership of various anti-American groups both here and abroad
understood the vital nature of the Bush initiative and thus launched
their demonstrations, world-wide, to "Stop The War". Failing this,
they also laid plans to build a political campaign inside the country,
with the War in Iraq as a plebiscite, using a little known politician
as the thrust point--Howard Dean. This helps to explain how quickly the
Radical Left moved into the Dean campaign with both people and money,
creating what the clueless media called the "Dean Phenomenon".

By building on the left-wing base in the Democrat party and the "Hate
Bush" crowd, the campaign has already resulted in a consensus among
the aspirants, minus Joe Lieberman, to withdraw the U.S. from Iraq and
turn the operation over to the U.N. And, if past is prologue, i.e.,
Vietnam, once the U.S. leaves it will not go back under any circumstances,
possibly even the destruction of Israel.

Should George W. Bush be defeated in November we could expect to
see the dominoes start to fall in the secular Islamic countries and The
Clash of Civilizations, predicted several years ago by Samuel Huntington,
would then become a life changing event in all of our lives.

What surprised the Jihadists following the 9/11 attack was how
American sentiment mobilized around the president and a profoun! d
sense of patriotism spread across the country. They were not expecting
this reaction, based on what had happened in the past, nor were they
expecting the determined resolve of the President himself. I also
believe this is one of the reasons we have not had any further attacks
within our borders. They are content to wait, just as one of their tactical
mentors; V.I. Lenin admonished..."two steps forward, one step back".

A couple additional events serve as valuable footnotes to the current
circumstances we face: the destruction of the human assets factor of the
CIA during the Carter presidency, presided over by the late Senator
Frank Church. This fact has plagued our intelligence agencies right up
to this very day with consequences which are now obvious. And, Jimmy Carter
himself, the one man who must bear the bulk of the responsibility for
setting the stage of the Third Jihad. Americans should find little
comfort in how the Democrat contenders constantly seek the "advice
and counsel" of this despicable little hypocrite.

Lastly, we should not expect to see any meaningful cooperation from
Western Europe, especially the French. Since failing to protect
their own interests in Algeria (by turning the country over to the first
of the Arab terrorists, Ammad Ben Bella), the country itself is now
occupied by Islamic immigrants totaling twenty percent of the population.

We are in the battle of our ! ;lives, a battle which will go on for many years
possibly even generations. If we fail to understand what we are facing or
falter in the challenge of "knowing our enemy" the results will be catastrophic.
Imagine a world where al Qaeda regimes control 75% of the world's oil,
have at their disposal nuclear weapons, legions of willing suicide soldiers,
and our national survival is dependent on the good graces of Kofi Annan
and the United Nations.

There is one final footnote which may be the scariest of all. Either
none of the Democrats currently leading the drive to their party's
nomination are aware of the facts of the Great Caliphate and Third
Jihad or they do know and they don't care so long as their power lust
is satisfied. But, I can guarantee you one thing for sure: some of
their most ardent supporters are aware of this and will do anything
they can to bring it about.

*******************End of Report***********************

Note....this was written before John Kerry had the nomination sewed
up...but recent events clearly demonstrate that Kerry is going to fulfill
Abraham's prediction of the Democrats calling for the UN and the
French/Germans/Spain coalition to force the US out of Iraq.

Also understand that the current 9/11 hearings are a political 'show'
and Clarke's book were timed for these hearings and the campaign.
And this is why Condoleezza Rice is seeking a private meeting wi! th
this commission to 'tell it like it is'. The national security issues
involved around 9/11 cannot be an open book to the public,
and I believe we have to understand that.

This is scary stuff. President Bush and the Republicans are obviously
extremely cautious in bringing this issue to the campaign because the
left-leaning media and the Kerry Democratic left would call this
'racist' against Islam and a distraction for the alleged lies of WMD
and our reasons for going into Iraq. Bush correctly referred to the
'axis of evil' (Iran, Libya, Iraq and North Korea) as a pointed strategy
to blunt the WMD-terrorist movement and he has been very successful
in thwarting al Qaeda, despite what everyone on the left says.
We are far better off without the threat from Iraq and Libya
all within the last 12 months.

We are threatened in Pakistan and if Musharraf is assassinated (it's
been tried several times in the past year), we can see how the militants
will gain control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons, which have already
spread to Iran (by a militant Islamic scientist) and if Musharraf is 'taken out'
we have both Iran and Pakistan as militant Islamic power bases armed
with nuclear weapons. And let's not overlook Abraham's issue about the
potential for militant Islamic states who would control 75% of the world's oil.

This probably why Dick Cheney, Rice, Powell, and Wolfowitz are
so comm! itted to the belief that we are in this struggle for the free
world as we have known it and focused on defeating the militant
Islamic-al Maida's global strategy. They skirt the core issues raised by
Abraham in this article because of the political-correctness implications, but
after reading this, you understand what is at stake here. Kerry and the
liberal Democrats want control of Washington at any price. Abraham clearly
spells out what price that is: Victory for al Qaeda and the Islamic militancy.

Abraham's article brought all of these issues together and why it is
important for us to gain this perspective and educate our friends
and associates.

This is a deeply impressive, cogent, and intelligent overview of the militant
Islamic movement. Pass on Abraham's article to those who have a need
to know, which is just about everybody. Top of Form 1

Bottom of Form 1

I'm wondering if those who hand out/sell the signs would know about your rights on this.

georgewbushstore.com's phone number is (877) 623-8721.

Quoted: \80 percent of the USA feels like he does............ chill whatever you do will not make a bit of difference.

liberal fantasies

Quoted: I'm wondering if those who hand out/sell the signs would know about your rights on this. georgewbushstore.com's phone number is (877) 623-8721.

hmmm




this could be fun, too bad the bush store wants $170 for a 4'x8' sign

if it turns out that I'm legally entitled to put this up (I doubt I am, since it is his property) I'd do it (or something more affordable). I can mount a camera in the window for 24 hour vandal observation too, and it records right onto an old laptop.

Quoted: Quoted: \80 percent of the USA feels like he does............ chill whatever you do will not make a bit of difference. liberal fantasies

so much for your 'promise' not to make any more political posts. attention whore.

ok, time to put up a sign ...



Someone give me some anti-kerry slogan related to "the economy" that will piss him off .... I'll print it up in large font and put it in the window