Quoted: The Vietnamese Service ribbon with four stars makes me suspicous. The stars represent campaign periods that were usually at least two months long. I don't belive there is anyway he could have four when he was only there for 4 1/2 months. I was there for a year and only rate three!
|
This sounds like it would be hard to figure out unless you had the exact dates of each campaign along with the serviceman's dates in country. Here are the campaigns listed on the Army's website:
VIETNAM SERVICE MEDAL: c. Soldiers receiving the Vietnam Service Medal are authorized to wear a bronze star to indicate each campaign. There are 17 designated campaigns during the period of 15 March 1962 through 28 January 1973. Units which receive campaign credit for any of the campaigns would display a streamer with inscription as shown on the unit's lineage and honors. The designated campaigns are:
Vietnam Advisory 1962-1965 Vietnam Defense 1965 Vietnam Counteroffensive 1965-1966 Vietnam Phase II 1966 - 1967 Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III 1967-1968 Tet Counteroffensive 1968 Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV 1968 Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V 1968 Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI 1968-1969 Tet 69 Counteroffensive 1969 Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 Sanctuary Counteroffensive 1970 Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII 1970-1971 Consolidation I 1971 Consolidation II 1971-1972 Vietnam Cease-Fire 1972-1973
|
There are a lot of campaigns listed in 1968, so without knowing what dates they covered and which ones he is claiming, it's hard to tell. And it certainly wouldn't be the first time that awards showed up on a DD 214 that someone wasn't entitled to. I had an E4 in my first platoon that was a 19K tanker, and his DD 214 said that he had earned the Expert Infantryman's Badge (EIB), a qualification badge that a tanker isn't even authorized to wear.
Every serviceman should know what qualifications and awards they are entitled to, and most people take a personal interest in ensuring that their records are accurate, whether for promotion purposes or just personal pride. I'm constantly updating my records with various training certificates and other small details, because 75% of the time, documents don't show up there automatically. So if someone like John Kerry had changes made on their DD 214, it's not necessarily wrong, especially in the days before everything was computerized. He could have made additions to it based on documents he had in his personal files that never made it into the 214. People shouldn't assume it's a conspiracy just because he made changes / additions - you need to look at each individual item to see if they are legitimate or not.
Dave