User Panel
Posted: 9/27/2021 5:59:04 PM EDT
I just re-read Ted's Manifesto (or at least scanned the first 62 paragraphs...).
Current events vaguely reminded me of the first time I read it decades ago. The guy correctly analyzed almost all aspects of Liberal's need to destroy the USA and obediently yield every aspect of their lives to big government or corporations. Unlike George Orwell who predicted a bit earlier timeline, Ted predicted a longer timeline but was MORE ACCURATE! Washington Post's publication of Ted Kaczynski's Manifesto. I also never realized that he's published a number of books while in prison. |
|
He may have been correct, but he would still be a free man living in his cabin if he hadn’t mailed all those bombs out.
|
|
|
I've never read his entire manifesto, just the bullet points that seem to agree with my take on society. I've heard it goes off the rails though.
|
|
Quoted: He may have been correct, but he would still be a free man living in his cabin if he hadn’t mailed all those bombs out. View Quote Yep... the guy was smarter than hell... it's too bad he didn't apply that toward more productive solutions. I worked in an office that had been targeted by one of his bombs. Years later, a friend found out that one of his neighbors at his cabin property was the Unabomber. Small world.... |
|
His message may have been right, but killing and wounding innocents isn’t the way to get your point across.
|
|
Can't say I ever read his manifesto. The guy has some interesting ideas. A madman sometimes is just someone who's ahead of his time.
Thus science marches on blindly, without regard to the real welfare of the human race or to any other standard, obedient only to the psychological needs of the scientists and of the government officials and corporation executives who provide the funds for research. View Quote Looking at you Fauci |
|
Quoted: Just another victim of the CIA. View Quote Look just because In his second year at Harvard, Kaczynski participated in a purposely brutalizing psychological experiment as part of project MK ultra ran by the CIA There is no evidence that this had any effect on him at all. Just pure coincidence. You’ll be telling me next there were more than one person in the van and one of them was a German spy who was just let off to go back to Germany a free man. |
|
|
It's one thing to be a prophet. Totally different animal to hurt people. Fuck that guy.
|
|
"Industrial Society and its Future" is a thought provoking read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I've never read his entire manifesto, just the bullet points that seem to agree with my take on society. I've heard it goes off the rails though. View Quote It does go off the rails but there is some truly interesting stuff in it. I don’t sit at red lights on abandoned streets in the middle of the night anymore. |
|
|
Quoted: I hate it when the nutjobs turn out to be right. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: Well, you can’t eat your cake and have it too. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He may have been correct, but he would still be a free man living in his cabin if he hadn’t mailed all those bombs out. Well, you can’t eat your cake and have it too. That’s the line his brother recognized and tipped off the FBI |
|
Quoted: he had that in common with mcveigh and arguably eric rudolph View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: His message may have been right, but killing and wounding innocents isn’t the way to get your point across. he had that in common with mcveigh and arguably eric rudolph Innocents were killed, but one could argue there is a difference between intentionally targeting innocents and innocents being killed as collateral damage. McVeigh was targeting the folks that massacred people at Waco. Rudolph was targeting those that killed innocents. While Kaczynski targeted people who seemed to involved somewhat with industry and technology, I think his primary intention was to grab attention not to actually affect change himself. Kaczynski was is probably the smarter of those three, but I'd argue he was more amoral in his actions. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Yup. Pretty sad really. But killing innocent people is never ok. View Quote Murdering innocents is a sin. Christianity and Atomic Bombs - AC078 |
|
You didn’t read it correctly.
Ted is an environmental leftist wacko. While in prison, he has been in communication and visited by Antifa and has advised them on their tactics. |
|
|
|
|
Everyone wants to fight the forces of darkness and evil -but also not hurt anyone.
|
|
I watched a documentary where he was interviewed and he admitted to hating children.
|
|
|
|
Its been a while since I read it, but recall thinking that Ted made some good points and some silly points but his jump to concluding that sending bombs was justified was just crazy. Like, 2^4= 8 crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I've never read his entire manifesto, just the bullet points that seem to agree with my take on society. I've heard it goes off the rails though. View Quote It's written like it's a technical manual. Lots of odd bullet points. Tough to make it through the entire read Guy was crazy smart, but he's not the first to advocate the luddite life. . . He was the first to send mail bombs out as a form of advocacy for it though lol |
|
|
Bought this recently, haven’t got around to reading it, mostly cause I’ve heard it’s depressingly accurate. Im sure I’m on some list now, since I ordered it on Amazon.
Attached File |
|
Quoted: Its been a while since I read it, but recall thinking that Ted made some good points and some silly points but his jump to concluding that sending bombs was justified was just crazy. Like, 2^4= 8 crazy. View Quote It also made his message easy to discard as toxic, he gave the left some talking points to point to whether he realized it at the time or not. |
|
On a similar note but without discussing Ted, I was listening to a theological lecture after a run last month.
The speaker opined we are both better off and worse from modern science. Tl;Dr follows: - Science moved slow early because early thinkers contemplated why. Put simply, we can't just find an antibiotic, because we need to know why it works. - This sucked because we can't always understand everything. So moving to a cause and effect science based approach was key. "This item seems to combat infection." brought us into a great period of huge discovery. - Now we never consider why and are comfortable hearing drug ads that even mention "This drug does X, but we don't even know how." Long story short he didn't even have an opinion, he was just making an observation. |
|
He didn't just hate liberals...
“The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.” |
|
|
Quoted: He didn't just hate liberals... “The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.” View Quote Yep. |
|
As another aside I saw a funny meme a few years ago about AnPrivs but I don't remember it fully.
It was like a guy getting chased by a tiger but he's not allowed glasses or a firearm so that's the way it goes lol |
|
|
The only real fault I could find in Industrial Society and it’s Future was the idea that mankind would ever let go of any of its technological advances and revert to a pre industrial revolution state. The very idea that it was possible seemed naive to me. I always felt that his assessment of our immediate needs being easily met and searching for purpose through surrogate activities hit the nail on the head 100%. Should be required reading. Anyone who dismisses his writings based on his crimes likely hasn’t read any of his stuff.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.