User Panel
|
I can’t fucking tell what’s satire anymore, on either side of the aisle.
|
|
|
Quoted: Show me any piece of legislation or executive order that brands the Republican Party as a terrorist organization. Show me one prosecution of a person for being a Republican or supporting the Republican Party. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: We already basically have a dictator, the dictatorship of progressivism. Rather have Trump if we are gonna have a dictator What do you call it when that government brands the opposition party a terror group and tries to punish its voters for their support. No legislation but the collective action that is taking place particularly trying to persecute people who attended the Jan 6 rally (not the entering of the capital). Silencing of most of the opposition voice. Actions inside the military now to "stamp out extremism". I know people suspended from work for 4 weeks without pay based on unsubstantiated claims of participating in the Jan 6 event. |
|
|
Quoted: No legislation but the collective action that is taking place particularly trying to persecute people who attended the Jan 6 rally (not the entering of the capital). Silencing of most of the opposition voice. Actions inside the military now to "stamp out extremism". I know people suspended from work for 4 weeks without pay based on unsubstantiated claims of participating in the Jan 6 event. View Quote |
|
3,2,1 until the Turtle makes a phone call to Chuck the schmuck Schumer where he tells Chuck that you will have our full support in confirming Garland as long as you tell him to crawl up Trumps ass and the asses of his entire family. He also tells Chuck that the repubs would not be opposed to the AG's of several liberal loon states to open up fishing expeditions into all things Trump.
|
|
Quoted: No we don't. We have a government in power that you don't like and I don't like, but they aren't dictators. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: We already basically have a dictator, the dictatorship of progressivism. Rather have Trump if we are gonna have a dictator I think Corporo-Fascism-Oligarchy would be more the operative word. The USSC pretty much sealed that today. Now, let's just see how far H.R. #1 goes, and how much political capital they spend to get it enacted. Once, and if, it gets enacted & USSC gives it their blessing, we'll see just what we dissolve into after this post-Constitutional Republic dies off. That government that you & I don't like? I hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but they ain't going to let those reins slip out of their hands..... Ever. Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I'm pretty sure he'd burn the whole country to the ground just to get payback. He doesn't seem like a man who handles a loss very well. View Quote I cant really blame him for wanting to burn it to the ground. We all know he was cheated out of the Whitehouse this time . The evidence is there if people open their eyes. |
|
|
|
Quoted: I think Corporo-Fascism-Oligarchy would be more the operative word. The USSC pretty much sealed that today. Now, let's just see how far H.R. #1 goes, and how much political capital they spend to get it enacted. Once, and if, it gets enacted & USSC gives it their blessing, we'll see just what we dissolve into after this post-Constitutional Republic dies off. That government that you & I don't like? I hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but they ain't going to let those reins slip out of their hands..... Ever. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/hillaryNod-496.gif View Quote |
|
|
|
While I agree with cm in a high probability of fake news, the alternative is the Kentucky turtle who says he determines the future of the gop and its candidates.
So fuck it, fake news or not that’s the choice to the fork in the road. |
|
Quoted: I just don't agree. I think it's incredibly defeatist to believe that our system of government is broken to the extent that some people believe it is. The government itself is screwed up, bureaucratic and freedom-limiting, but it is not a dictatorship. The reality is that there are more and more people that differ with you and I regarding some very basic principles. Unfortunately, we are on the losing side of demographics and changing attitudes and ideals. Nothing is going to reverse that, but it doesn't mean that we are living in a dictatorship, it just means that we are losing at the polls. The solution is to figure out a winning coalition. The way to lose is by using the Republican Party as a battering ram. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think Corporo-Fascism-Oligarchy would be more the operative word. The USSC pretty much sealed that today. Now, let's just see how far H.R. #1 goes, and how much political capital they spend to get it enacted. Once, and if, it gets enacted & USSC gives it their blessing, we'll see just what we dissolve into after this post-Constitutional Republic dies off. That government that you & I don't like? I hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but they ain't going to let those reins slip out of their hands..... Ever. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/hillaryNod-496.gif The losing end of a demographic is by design. Changing attitudes? Try socialism. We keep running candidates against literally Santa Claus. Importing people from other countries as fast as we can isn't helping and is a traditional position of the old republican party. If we keep doing things the same way will keep losing. Better to burn the party down and rebuild it with a smaller tighter control. I don't see any broad coalition working out. |
|
Quoted: I have no doubt he could lead republican voters effectively but 85% of republican politicians at the national level would never be on board.T$ already has money, money he made over 40 plus years of conducting legitimate business.For the majority of Congress people holding office is nothing more than an opportunity to get rich through influence peddling,backdoor deals and outright theft. View Quote Watching the dems just go absolute apeshit trying to find something, anything, to charge him with, has pretty much proven to me that he is a far better man than I ever could have imagined. If he was 1/1millionth as evil and corrupt as they claim, they would have found something in 2015 to take him out. |
|
Quoted: I just don't agree. I think it's incredibly defeatist to believe that our system of government is broken to the extent that some people believe it is. The government itself is screwed up, bureaucratic and freedom-limiting, but it is not a dictatorship. The reality is that there are more and more people that differ with you and I regarding some very basic principles. Unfortunately, we are on the losing side of demographics and changing attitudes and ideals. Nothing is going to reverse that, but it doesn't mean that we are living in a dictatorship, it just means that we are losing at the polls. The solution is to figure out a winning coalition. The way to lose is by using the Republican Party as a battering ram. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think Corporo-Fascism-Oligarchy would be more the operative word. The USSC pretty much sealed that today. Now, let's just see how far H.R. #1 goes, and how much political capital they spend to get it enacted. Once, and if, it gets enacted & USSC gives it their blessing, we'll see just what we dissolve into after this post-Constitutional Republic dies off. That government that you & I don't like? I hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but they ain't going to let those reins slip out of their hands..... Ever. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/hillaryNod-496.gif I’m not sure, but isn’t this what leads to dictatorship? |
|
What's the GOP's platform without Trump? They're largely in agreement with Biden on trade, immigration and foreign policy. The Bush Republicans and "national security conservatives" actually endorsed Biden. Meanwhile the "principled conservatives" like Ted Cruz are both unpopular and useless. They promote some bizarre set of libertarian values while not doing anything about the socialist taxes, laws, subsidies, a massive standing military and of course not ever touching entitlement spending.
Trump says he wants to protect industry, renegotiate trade and pull back from foreign conflicts and the GOP had no response in 2016. They still don't. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I wish he was the authoritarian monster the left tried to make him out to be. So he actually wasn’t? Yeesh... he did NOTHING that could even be likened to dictatorship. Now your hero Biden, he's another story. Over fifty executive orders and STILL GOING. |
|
Quoted: I'm not sure, but isn't this what leads to dictatorship? View Quote |
|
Quoted: “...The source reportedly added that "payback is his chief obsession." https://media1.tenor.com/images/2859bedbc0f716f5bffdb2ecdcafc58c/tenor.gif?itemid=9430921 View Quote This line is what made my BS detector start beeping. “Chief obsession” just doesn’t sound like a real statement. However, I think Trump has everything to gain by being somewhat public at this point. Why look like a bitch and go out with a whimper when you could be a constant, living reminder to the political class that middle America is not onboard with the fuckery in this country? |
|
Quoted: I'm not sure, but isn't this what leads to dictatorship? View Quote |
|
|
At this point, I'm with whoever is actually fighting back against the demonrat commie scum. If someone else wants to fight harder than President Trump, then I welcome them. So far, he is still doing all the heavy lifting that they just won't do.
|
|
|
Quoted: At this point, I'm with whoever is actually fighting back against the demonrat commie scum. If someone else wants to fight harder than President Trump, then I welcome them. So far, he is still doing all the heavy lifting that they just won't do. View Quote When somebody better wants to step up, I'll back them. Nobody else is stepping up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I just don't agree. I think it's incredibly defeatist to believe that our system of government is broken to the extent that some people believe it is. The government itself is screwed up, bureaucratic and freedom-limiting, but it is not a dictatorship. The reality is that there are more and more people that differ with you and I regarding some very basic principles. Unfortunately, we are on the losing side of demographics and changing attitudes and ideals. Nothing is going to reverse that, but it doesn't mean that we are living in a dictatorship, it just means that we are losing at the polls. The solution is to figure out a winning coalition. The way to lose is by using the Republican Party as a battering ram. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: I'm pretty sure he'd burn the whole country to the ground just to get payback. He doesn't seem like a man who handles a loss very well. View Quote If his record confirms one thing, it's that as 'vengeful' as Trump supposedly is, he doesn't ever burn shit down or take strategic action to solve problems. Hate to say it but the man may be genuine (that's what I've come to realize) but his methods/tactics are pure pettiness. Otherwise he'd have destroyed Twitter, for example. |
|
|
|
Quoted: He'll split the party. Which is what the dems want. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Trump needs to retaliate and consolidate the party. Its what the Democrats would do. YOU KNOW the Guys who keep beating Republicans? He'll split the party. Which is what the dems want. You heard the man, fellas; the Dems really don't want us cutting the(ir) RINO tumor out of our party. |
|
Since 4 years obviously wasn't enough for the RINOs to get the message, then MAGA just needs to keep on doing what it's doing.
The Republican Party needs a purge, but it's not gonna be the MAGA wing that hits the door. You don't beat the Democrats by pretending to be a Dem-Lite and winning a few wishy-washy middle morons. You win by getting the blue collar vote. Trump knows this. If we ever have fair elections again (that's a big if), that is the *only* way that the Republicans will ever win again, because the MAGA wing won't show up for another Romney-esque candidate again. |
|
Quoted: He'll split the party. Which is what the dems want. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Trump needs to retaliate and consolidate the party. Its what the Democrats would do. YOU KNOW the Guys who keep beating Republicans? He'll split the party. Which is what the dems want. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.