Honestly, I can get over the fact that there is pre-ban vs. post-ban rifles...I really can! What I don't and won't soon get over is how impressively [b]unenforced[/b] this Clinton ban has been. Granted, if you commit a crime with an illegal pre-ban, it will be noted and will be charged against you along with your other misfits. But as anyone actually heard of a case where a pre-ban gun was seen at a range/home/etc by an LEO officer and confiscated due to its "illegal" nature? I would rather the fact-based ignorant ban not have gone through in the first place, but Ex Post facto aside, I believe these officers should keep up more with how to defend themselves and others in a combat situations with these weapons, rather than knowing whether that bayonet lug should be there or not.
Most cops get a lot of crap for being ignorant about guns...mostly because it's true! Especially here in Alabama, every other officer I have been in encounter with, and there have been a few because I know quite a few personally, is a Barnie Fife in many respects. He does his patrol, he writes up his forms at the office, hangs his hat and goes home...and hell in a perfect world, we wouldn't need "law enforcement" and that would be all they needed to do. But when it comes to the issue of firearms, especially when one of us has a registered, legal SMG, AR15, or other "assault-type" weapon like many here do, they look at it with a suspicious eye and say 'are dem der things legal son?'
I think, as a whole (b/c I know 99% of the LEO guys here know exactly what is gun-legal and illegal), law enforcement should put a little more time into their GENERAL firearms knowledge (and *cough* their marksmanship). But when it comes to the '94 Ban, I don't blame any officer out there who doesn't know the difference between a pre-ban and post-ban AR15...because I think it is ridiculous.
I have given hundred of dollars to my FOP, and as a donor I would much rather see my money going to good use in buying better equipment and funding training and seeing current laws enforced, rather than gun bans and respective legislation that just adds confusion and frivolousness when most officers would probably rather worry about not getting themselves killed by a firearm (instead of knowing "how legal" that firearm was). We should seriously consider how gun legislation not only affects the homicide count, but also the police force. Like Agabriel said, "if that bayonet lug never really killed anybody in action, then why ban it?" But maybe I've said too much already.
[i]Now I don't want to get on a rant here...[/i] - Dennis Miller
Jewbroni~