Looking at my reloading manual, with 180 grain bullets and 24" barrels the 300 Win Mag can do 3160 fps. The 300 RUM can do 3220 fps. That is pretty close to being identical. Adding the extra expense, recoil and action length into the equation, and what we have is another dud marketing ploy from Remington.
I suspected something was a little fishy when Remington first introduced this cartridge. It had a chart comparing the 300 Win, 300 Wby and 300 RUM. In the small print, the RUM had a 26" barrel, while the other two had 24" barrels. The Wby load in the comparison was an underpowered Remington offering, as opposed to Weatherby's full powered round. The RUM was using streamlined Nolser Partition bullets while other two only had the old pudgy Core Lokts. Basically, Remington was comparing apples to oranges.