User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:38:46 PM EDT
I am just curious! I think I will stick with Bush since I am a raving lunatic conservative extremist Republican! There I said it
 !BUT WHAT IF!!! Who will you vote for in 2004 if King BUSH rolls on the gun ban? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:39:55 PM EDT
[#1]
It will pretty much come down to Sept of 04.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:47:10 PM EDT
[#2]
[img]http://www.mickey-mouse.com/clipart/m017.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:47:24 PM EDT
[#3]
WHO will YOU vote for in 2004 for President? LOL! You come to this board and ask this question? I will vote for Hillary............[ROFL2] Never in my dream cowboy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:55:44 PM EDT
[#4]
You have to ask yourself this question:
Is it more important for the Republic to keep a Democrat such as [b]Howard Moe Curly Dean[/b] out of the White House, or for the citizens to have a bayonet lug or a folding stock on their favorite so-called 'assault weapon'? After almost [b]10 years[/b] under the Clinton- era 'Assault Weapon Ban', it amazes me how many assault weapons there still are, and how well the gun manufacturers and the citizens have circumvented the ban. I would gladly KEEP the ban in place, if I knew as a certainty that there was never, ever going to be any more attempts to ban weapons or otherwise interfere with the RKBA! But, alas, there can be no such certainty so long as there is an organized Democrat Party that seeks to disarm us. So, I will vote for George W. Bush no matter what happens to the AWB renewal or sunsetting. I only hope that Tom DeLay (R-TX) manages to keep his promise to us that the renewal bill will never see the light of day! The Democrats don't sound too pumped up about gun control nowadays, either, do they? [:D] Eric The(Rational)Hun[>]:)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:57:52 PM EDT
[#5]
AR.....what is you problem? Let me guess, because I dont have 3 million posts AND I have not paid my dues you think I am a Democrat infiltrating the AO!
Seriously......who are you voting for? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 3:58:22 PM EDT
[#6]
I do know that I will not under any circumstances vote for any SFB Democrap.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:00:40 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted: AR.....what is you problem? Let me guess, because I dont have 3 million posts AND I have not paid my dues you think I am a Democrat infiltrating the AO! Seriously......who are you voting for? Very good....You have paid attention to my post count......now if you read them, you will know who I will vote for. [:)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:03:11 PM EDT
[#8]
I will vote for a Dem as long as they pose them on a photoshoot hunt so that I know they are regular Joes. (Totally joking!)
I threaten to go Libertarian if GWB doesn't let the AWB sunset but I probabbly won't decide until November. Last time Bush carried the state by 90,000 votes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:04:06 PM EDT
[#9]
FINALLY! some respect from the team! I will vote Bush due to loyalty to the party! Just wanted to see who and why some people would vote the other way!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:05:23 PM EDT
[#10]
SS109....... who is the canidate for the Libertarian's?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:06:19 PM EDT
[#11]
Constitution Party
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:13:09 PM EDT
[#12]
A pro-gun candidate.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:37:43 PM EDT
[#13]
I'm a single issue voter this time.
If the AWB dies and is not extended or replaced by a more sinister law, I will vote GWB. If we still have an AWB on Sept 14 2004, I will CHECK EVERY DEMOCRAT BOX ON MY BALLOT! Hell, I'll even post a picture of the ballot if GWB makes me vote Democrat. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:41:42 PM EDT
[#14]
Do you guys think Bush is going to roll over on this issue?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:41:48 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted: You have to ask yourself this question: Is it more important for the Republic to keep a Democrat such as [b]Howard Moe Curly Dean[/b] out of the White House, or for the citizens to have a bayonet lug or a folding stock on their favorite so-called 'assault weapon'? After almost [b]10 years[/b] under the Clinton- era 'Assault Weapon Ban', it amazes me how many assault weapons there still are, and how well the gun manufacturers and the citizens have circumvented the ban. I would gladly KEEP the ban in place, if I knew as a certainty that there was never, ever going to be any more attempts to ban weapons or otherwise interfere with the RKBA! But, alas, there can be no such certainty so long as there is an organized Democrat Party that seeks to disarm us. So, I will vote for George W. Bush no matter what happens to the AWB renewal or sunsetting. I only hope that Tom DeLay (R-TX) manages to keep his promise to us that the renewal bill will never see the light of day! The Democrats don't sound too pumped up about gun control nowadays, either, do they? [:D] Eric The(Rational)Hun[>]:)] VERY WELL SAID !!! Nothing I hate more than someone cutting off their nose to spite their face. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:43:14 PM EDT
[#16]
*see ETH's answer above.
GovtThug, you can not be damned serious! What are you, nuts? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:43:16 PM EDT
[#17]
Shrubco, Rummy, and the PNAC!
Of course our votes won't matter anyways, since all the Diebold voting machines will be rigged in our favor! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:48:41 PM EDT
[#18]
Hears to another 4 years of LIHOP and MIHOP ;)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 4:55:30 PM EDT
[#19]
Bush, of course.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:02:31 PM EDT
[#20]
I will never vote for Bush because of his “Patriot Act” and other related issues. I will also not vote for any democrat other than Dean because of their positions on guns (especially not John “The Hunter” Kerry). Dean’s position on guns is very similar to GWB’s, so neither gain favor over the other on this issue.
The only party that really reflects my political philosophy is the Libertarian Party, so I will probably vote for them. However, it the AWB is renewed I might still be so PO’ed about it by Election Day that I’d vote for Dean just s I could hurt Bush’s chances as much as possible. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:09:53 PM EDT
[#21]
I've lived through more Presidents than most of you guys. When I was born, it was FDR's last year. Some Dems were okay. I didn't mind JFK. LBJ was a crook and murder. Carter was just a dumb back-hills boy. Truman was before my thinking time but I liked what I heard. Clinton was something else. I honestly believe he was a crook, debaucher, murderer and was impeached. Ronnie was my hero. Bush No. 1 let me down big time (acted like he didn't want to win and raised taxes). Nixon was okay. A great statesman but dumb in trying to cover up his over-zealot boys. Dubya is really different. When this man says something, he'll do it. He's no dummie. He's surrounded himself with very smart people. Is winning the war on terror possible? I think not. But he will put a lot of dents in their fenders. Dubya has my vote hands down. Sorry, but anyone voting for any one of 9 dwarfs has their head wedged in their ass...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:18:10 PM EDT
[#22]
G.W. Bush of course! You mean there's somebody else running?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:20:55 PM EDT
[#23]
[img]http://www.addlepated.net/archives/images/opusbill.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:22:36 PM EDT
[#24]
Glad my head is not wedge in my ass!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:24:31 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted: I'm a single issue voter this time. If the AWB dies and is not extended or replaced by a more sinister law, I will vote GWB. If we still have an AWB on Sept 14 2004, I will CHECK EVERY DEMOCRAT BOX ON MY BALLOT! Hell, I'll even post a picture of the ballot if GWB makes me vote Democrat. What he said. NMSight |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:28:04 PM EDT
[#26]
Quoted: who is the canidate for the Libertarian's? It hasn’t been decided yet, but it will probably be Harry Brown again. The 2004 Libertarian Party National Convention will be held May 27-31 and they will officially select a candidate then. Here is the convention website: [url]http://www.lp.org/conv/2004/[/url] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:31:16 PM EDT
[#27]
Thanks CATO556
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:31:28 PM EDT
[#28]
There are bigger issues than the AWB to use as a voting guide...
Socialist/Universal Health Care: Bush: Against Dean: For Finishing the job in Iraq: Bush: For Dean: Against Kowtowing to the United Nimbies: Bush: Against Dean: For Tax Increases: Bush: Against Dean: For See the picture... Even if by some odd chance GW gets a bill to sign (and we're within 6mo, so far no dice), there are more reasons to vote for him than not to... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:32:28 PM EDT
[#29]
Hey! The link is not working?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:33:54 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted: I've lived through more Presidents than most of you guys. When I was born, it was FDR's last year. Some Dems were okay. I didn't mind JFK. LBJ was a crook and murder. Carter was just a dumb back-hills boy. Truman was before my thinking time but I liked what I heard. Clinton was something else. I honestly believe he was a crook, debaucher, murderer and was impeached. Ronnie was my hero. Bush No. 1 let me down big time (acted like he didn't want to win and raised taxes). Nixon was okay. A great statesman but dumb in trying to cover up his over-zealot boys. Dubya is really different. When this man says something, he'll do it. He's no dummie. He's surrounded himself with very smart people. Is winning the war on terror possible? I think not. But he will put a lot of dents in their fenders. Dubya has my vote hands down. Sorry, but anyone voting for any one of 9 dwarfs has their head wedged in their ass... Although not quite as old as Railman, I too remember all the presidents from JFK. I agree with everything he said except for Carter, who was my hero for fighting and winning (not under his term of office) the Cold War. GWB is the real deal and hopefully we can find somebody like minded in 2008. CW Etided becuas mi fingrs donnt werk tooo weel. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:34:10 PM EDT
[#31]
I did not know this! Thanks DAVE_A
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:36:10 PM EDT
[#32]
[img]http://www.georgewbush.com/images/downloads/GWB_logo_350.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:43:55 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted: Hey! The link is not working? Thank’s for noting that. Link fixed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:46:52 PM EDT
[#34]
as stated before:
It's an AWB thang |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:47:52 PM EDT
[#35]
Let me tell you a little story about ham and eggs.
A farmer walks out into the yard one day, and loudly proclaims, "I think I'll have ham and eggs for breakfast." Now, the pigs and the chickens all get very wide eyed upon hearing this. The difference is, the chickens are concerned, but the pigs are INVOLVED. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 5:56:15 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted: There are bigger issues than the AWB to use as a voting guide... Socialist/Universal Health Care: Bush: Against Dean: For [red]How about the prescription drug bill?[/red] Finishing the job in Iraq: Bush: For Dean: Against [red]bush will draw it out as long as he can, the never declared, never ending war[/red] Kowtowing to the United Nimbies: Bush: Against Dean: For [red]bush keeps trying for un approval, and got us back into UNESCO[/red] Tax Increases: Bush: Against Dean: For [red]he may have learned one thing from daddy bush[/red] See the picture...[red] Yes and it scares me[/red] Even if by some odd chance GW gets a bill to sign (and we're within 6mo, so far no dice), there are more reasons to vote for him than not to...[red] Yep, more loss of freedoms, vote for shrub[/red] I won't know who I will be voting for till the election, I may not even vote this time. I will only vote if there is somebody, anybody, that will protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The shrub and the 9 dwarves don't get my vote. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:10:45 PM EDT
[#37]
Bush's domestic policies will destroy or seriously harm this country. Drug bill will be added to and cause taxes to be raised enormously, especially for our children and grandchildren. Patriot Acts destroy 4th and 5th. His savings plans next year will destroy retirement plans by employers, especially small employers. His No Left Behind education bill is unconstitutional and will futher socialism. He talks conservative but does not preside as a conservative. He ignores the Constitution he is sworn to uphold.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:11:28 PM EDT
[#38]
he's already said he supports the AWB
Quoted: Do you guys think Bush is going to roll over on this issue? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:16:09 PM EDT
[#39]
Quoted: I'm a single issue voter this time. If the AWB dies and is not extended or replaced by a more sinister law, I will vote GWB. If we still have an AWB on Sept 14 2004, I will CHECK EVERY DEMOCRAT BOX ON MY BALLOT! Hell, I'll even post a picture of the ballot if GWB makes me vote Democrat. Well! That's a fine 'howdy-do' to come out of your hole with! Where'ya been, and is that all you've got now that you're here?! [;)] I see we may cancel each other out, unless you're just kidding, of course. You ARE kidding, aren't you...? [;D] Always good to see you, GovtThug. [img]http://www.georgewbush.com/images/downloads/GWB_logo_350.gif[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:23:42 PM EDT
[#40]
I won't vote democrat
if Bush does something I really disagree with, or it looks like NY will go democrat like usual I'll probably vote Libertarian just to help get their numbers up |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:27:11 PM EDT
[#41]
Personally I think Bush is becoming a Republican in name only. The 15 trillion dollar prescription plan is worse than Clinton even imagined.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:27:35 PM EDT
[#42]
It sure as hell won't be any of the current crop of Democrats.
If GWB renews the AWB or something worse I will likely not vote. He is WAY too far left for me but the best we can do at the time, I guess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:27:47 PM EDT
[#43]
Personally I think Bush is becoming a Republican in name only. The 15 trillion dollar prescription plan is worse than Clinton even imagined.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:34:04 PM EDT
[#44]
Quoted: Quoted: I'm a single issue voter this time. If the AWB dies and is not extended or replaced by a more sinister law, I will vote GWB. If we still have an AWB on Sept 14 2004, I will CHECK EVERY DEMOCRAT BOX ON MY BALLOT! Hell, I'll even post a picture of the ballot if GWB makes me vote Democrat. Well! That's a fine 'howdy-do' to come out of your hole with! Where'ya been, and is that all you've got now that you're here?! [;)] Where have I been? Moved into a new house. The other guy in my 2-man office retired in June, his replacement got here last week. Workload has just about doubled since the war started. Thanksgiving and a houseful of people. Christmas and an assload of shopping and a houseload of people. The Guinea Pig's always fucking hungry. Every time I make a move, the little bastards squeakin' his head off for alfalfa. Change of command for the commander. Change of responsibility for the 1SG. Veteran's Day ceremony. Visit to the Veteran's home for Christmas. And about a thousand other things. Other than that, I guess I really have no excuse for not being here. My bad. Well, maybe the big stretch of woods behind my house has something to do with it too. [:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:41:11 PM EDT
[#45]
Voting for Democrats, if the AWB ban is renewed, is kind of like cutting your dick off if your wife or girlfriend says *no* some night.
I will not vote for ANY Democrap, for ANY reason. They openly seek to usurp our god given, individual, constitutional rights. If the AWB gets renewed or expanded, I may just be too busy to vote(for the president, at least) that day. My state always throws it's electoral votes to the Democraps, anyway, but at least my vote won't show up in the national totals. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:55:19 PM EDT
[#46]
Post from Cato556 -
It hasn’t been decided yet, but it will probably be Harry Brown again. Wow! Harry Browne is fast on his way to becoming the Harold Stassen of the Libertarian Party! Remember that the 'high water mark' of the Libertarian Party was the General Election of 1980! That's right, [b]1980![/b] Ed Clark/David Koch (Libertarian) 921,299 1.06% The next best finish by the Libertarian Party was by our own Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) in 1988: 1988 - Ron Paul/Andre Marrou Libertarian 432,184 0.47% 2000 - Harry Browne/Art Olivier Libertarian 384,440 0.36% 1984 - David Bergland/James Lewis Libertarian 228,314 0.25% 1972 - John Hospers/Theodora Nathan Libertarian 3,673 0.00% Compare those numbers with the 1968 Third Party Candidacy of George Wallace - His American Independent Party received 9,906,473 votes, which represented 13.53% of all votes. He received 46 Electoral votes, as well! That was a real Third Party! Eric The(Statistical)Hun[>]:)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 6:59:34 PM EDT
[#47]
Bush, of course. He led this country in our war against the muslims.
He lowered taxes. Like his old man, he tries to straddle the political fence a little, but he does what he says, and he has my respect and my vote. If he can keep the demoncrats out of office for 4 more years, he will have my undying gratitude. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 7:01:12 PM EDT
[#48]
... I'll reserve my choice until after 9/15/04
... Like [b][i]MANY[/b][/i] people I know, I'm a single issue voter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 7:03:42 PM EDT
[#49]
I think I'll have to vote Bush no matter what, because I'd rather have a Republican VP able to cast the deciding vote in a Senate tie. IMHO, that's something that needs to be taken into consideration.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/29/2003 7:08:31 PM EDT
[#50]
I see we may cancel each other out, unless you're just kidding, of course. You ARE kidding, aren't you...? [;D] Actually, I'm not kidding. In my story about the ham and eggs, I left out one very important group: the cows. You see, the cows, upon hearing of the breakfast choice of the farmer, are neither concerned nor involved. They have their own agenda, and the fact that the farmer wants ham and eggs for breakfast does not threaten them. What they fail to realize is, that the farmer might want a hamburger for lunch. So what we have is: The pigs. They are threatened in a serious way RIGHT NOW. Just as the guarantees under the Second Amendment are threatened seriously RIGHT NOW. The chickens. They are not so much threatened right now, but things ain't looking good. Just like the guarantees of the rest of the Amendments and the Constitution are looking a bit threatened. The cows. They're not so concerned with all of this constitution stuff. They just don't want their situation to change. They feel safe, no one's fucking with them, they can graze and eat and do what they want. They see what's going on in the barnyard, but it really doesn't affect them. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
