Since Malvo's getting life, I thought I'd spout off on my view of cruel and unusual punishment.
I personally think it's certainly cruel to lock away someone for life who's only 17. A lot of people say "Good - let him suffer!" but retribution isn't part of our penal system. We don't hang prisoners upside down by their feet and whack them with sticks every day.
We don't starve prisoners and zap them with electric shocks for fun. We put them away from society both as punishment for their crimes and to keep society safer.
The cost is certainly excessive. Some prisons run $30-40k/year per inmate. Some say this is cheaper that fighting a death sentence appeal for 20 years, which may be true.
But, to tell a 17 year old he's in jail for the next 60 or 70 years with no chance of getting out, well that's just not right.
The only decent thing to do is to execute them. My state is the only one left that uses the firing squad, but they are considering getting rid of it. Again, it comes down to cruel and unusual punishment. I think it's highly cruel to send huge amounts of electricity through someone until blood shoots out of their eyes, all their muscles contract until bones break, and then wait for them to die.
The gas chamber and lethal injection are the same. Hanging isn't even that effective - unless the neck snaps, the guy just hangs there until he suffocates. Fat people who get hanged have a propensity to have their heads pop off, which is pretty gruesome. A firing squad is not only cheap, but instantly effective. In my opinion, it is the most humane way to go.
If we as a nation decide not to lower ourselves to the level of the barbarian, we must implement our punishments as humanely as possible.