Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 12/7/2003 6:53:33 PM EDT
'Our Little Secret'
by R. Scott Moxley

A bombshell audio recording reveals police suppressed evidence that Assistant Sheriff Don Haidl’s teenage son was caught smoking marijuana while awaiting trial on charges he participated in a 2002 videotaped gang rape of an unconscious 16-year-old girl.

Official records show that Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo secretly ordered Sgt. Richard Downing to bury evidence of Gregory Scott Haidl’s involvement in an Oct. 26 San Clemente drug bust. Records also prove that Sheriff’s Lt. William J. Hunt--chief of police services in San Clemente, where the sheriff has jurisdiction--released Haidl without arrest and chauffeured him home. In a subsequent report, Hunt downplayed the ride as a "courtesy to another member of the department whose son was in a situation he should not have been in."

Haidl is awaiting a March trial on the rape charges. Under terms of his $100,000 bail, a drug arrest would have landed the 18-year-old in jail immediately.

Sheriff’s Department officials deny they obstructed justice on Haidl’s behalf.

But a sheriff’s department audio recording offers a rare, candid glimpse of Orange County law enforcement. On the tape, an excited Downing reaches Jaramillo at home on the night of Oct. 26. He tells Jaramillo, a political appointee close to Sheriff Mike Carona, that deputies have helped Haidl get out of "trouble." Downing tells Jaramillo that officers found young Haidl "smoking pot behind some industrial buildings" with two other teenagers and that Hunt has "cut loose" Haidl without arrest or citation.

"Okay," says Jaramillo, who then orders that any records of the encounter be "buried" because "the press will be all over this." Downing replies that the incident won’t appear in the official log. He tells Jaramillo the drug bust will be "our little secret."

For five days, the stratagem worked. Deputies kept the episode hidden from public view by recording erroneous or factually incomplete information in their reports. Deputy J. Roche, an officer at the scene, wrote in his Oct. 26 "Daily Activity Report" that he merely found the three teenagers skateboarding in San Clemente’s Talega Business Park. He concluded vaguely: "all released; no prosecution." Roche did not mention Haidl’s family connection or rape charges, the sandwich bag and orange pill bottle containing 3.5 grams of marijuana, the yellow glass smoking pipe with pot residue, or why officers had lingered at the scene for 65 minutes.

All anyone on the outside world was supposed to know about the drug bust was the deceptive words deputies used on the department’s online incident log: "traffic stop."

But on Oct. 31, KCBS-TV reporter Dave Lopez spooked deputies when he confronted them with a tip that Haidl had received a favor, like a ride home from an illegal skateboarding event. Sheriff’s spokesman Jim Amormino coyly told Lopez that Haidl had been given a ride home, but said the favor wasn’t a big deal.

Officers may have appeared calm, but behind the scenes tension mounted. Sheriff’s department records show that within hours of the Lopez call, deputies filed a new, backdated and altered "crime report" and, in violation of sheriff’s policy, logged the drugs--inexplicably minus the pot pipe--into the evidence locker more than 100 hours after they’d been confiscated.

Roche’s new version of events carried a handwritten date of Oct. 26 but was not time-stamped until Oct. 31. During those five days the skateboarding incident became a "possession of marijuana" case--not against Haidl, but against his 16-year-old companion. Roche dutifully noted that he had "seized" drugs and promptly logged the narcotics into evidence. Nowhere did he bother to explain numerous discrepancies with his original report.

Even more problematic is that sheriff’s department files do not support Roche’s new account. For example, evidence-tracking records reviewed by the Weekly demonstrate that many items were logged in during the Oct. 26-27 shift--a fraudulent check, a screwdriver, a Popov vodka bottle, a spray-paint can, a California license plate and an obscenity-laden paddle--but no drugs from the Haidl incident.

An apparent part of the cover-up was the effort to get the 16-year-old suspect to take responsibility for the pot—in hopes of relieving Haidl of any culpability. Law enforcement sources claim Haidl’s 16-year-old skateboarding companion agreed to the deal sometime between Oct. 26 and Oct. 31. They say the minor was promised that his name would remain secret and he’d only have to attend drug diversion classes as punishment.

On Nov. 3, KCBS aired its report about deputies giving Haidl a special ride home, and though some involved officers privately expressed no fear, others openly worried about further leaks. The next day, Chief Hunt wrote a memo to the City Council and City Manager George Scarborough. In the memo, Hunt expressed hope that there would be "no more negative press." He also described the affair as routine and promised "there was no reason for [Haidl’s] arrest."

But Hunt didn’t mention that his officers had filed multiple contradictory reports, publicly listed a drug bust as a traffic stop, misplaced the pot pipe and took five days to log the marijuana into evidence. At the end of the memo, he noted that he would continue to work with the sheriff’s media relations unit to explain the "actual circumstances of this incident" to the press.

But it’s not just the press asking questions anymore. In early November, the grand jury opened an investigation to determine if officers obstructed justice on Haidl’s behalf. The citizen-led panel working in conjunction with District Attorney Tony Rackauckas has a copy of the Downing-Jaramillo audiotape as well as contradictory official reports of the incident. The first witness called in for an explanation was Jaramillo, but he pleaded the 5th Amendment.

Asked if he ordered deputies to bury evidence in the drug bust, Jaramillo told the Weekly, "Nope, nope, nope. I didn’t give such an order . . . I never used the word bury."

But he admitted that he did hope to keep the incident—which he called a "chump-change infraction"--out of the press. "I may have said, ‘Don’t put [the incident] on the log,’ but I had just woken up."

Jaramillo denied that his intervention was improper or illegal. "There was nothing unusual about this," he said. "We’ve done this many times for politicians."

"I’m not so naïve as to try to get something buried," Jaramillo said. He added that everything he discussed that night with Downing was "standard operating procedure."

Jaramillo also adamantly denied that he knew Haidl had been smoking pot. "They did not tell me that," he said.

The assistant sheriff says he welcomes the grand jury investigation. "It isn’t a cover-up," he said. "It’s a procedural thing about keeping embarrassing things out of the press . . . I don’t want good people like the Haidls to be beaten on."

The San Clemente pot case isn’t the only time Jaramillo allegedly interceded in a criminal matter for young Haidl. Jaramillo became the subject of controversy during the investigation of the 2002 videotaped gang bang of an unconscious 16-year-old girl in Haidl’s Newport Beach house. Prosecutors claim Jaramillo advised the Haidl family not to answer their questions.

"I was not involved," Jaramillo told the Weekly. "I played no role. I played no part. I didn’t talk to the boy or anyone else."

Along with Kyle Joseph Nachreiner and Keith James Spann, both also 18, Haidl now faces a March trial for allegedly raping and then sexually molesting the girl with a cigarette, Snapple bottle and a pool stick. Defense lawyers claim the girl consented to the sex before she passed out and the teenagers activated the video camera. All three teenagers face life in prison if convicted.

Downing, Hunt and Haidl did not respond to interview requests.


Link Posted: 12/7/2003 6:54:18 PM EDT
[#1]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A transcript of the Oct. 26 telephone call between Sheriff's Sgt. Richard Downing and Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo after deputies found accused rapist Gregory Scott Haidl--son of Assistant Sheriff Don Haidl--"smoking pot" during a drug bust:


Jaramillo

Jaramillo: Hello?

Downing: Hope I didn’t wake you up. I wanted to catch you before you went to sleep, but I just found this out myself. I’m just giving you a heads-up that Don Haidl’s son got into a little bit of trouble in our area in San Clemente. He and a couple of his friends were smoking pot behind some industrial buildings. He’s been cut loose with no citation or anything. The sergeant is going to notify Chief Haidl right now about the incident.

Jaramillo: Which son?

Downing: Gregory.

Jaramillo: Okay. Ummm. He didn’t get cited or anything?

Downing: No, we did not.

Jaramillo: Listen.

Downing: Yes, sir.

Jaramillo: The press will be all over this.

Downing: I know.

Jaramillo: So we got to make sure that this gets buried.

Downing: I know. That’s why I’m calling you personally. It won’t be put on the log or anything, and the chief [Haidl] is going to know. That’s our little secret.

Jaramillo: So when he got stopped, where was he?

Downing: He was in an industrial complex in San Clemente. He and a couple of his friends were smoking marijuana. They had less than one ounce and he didn’t want to give a lot of information. He told the sergeant and the deputy he lived in Rancho Cucamonga, but they found out he was staying with his mother in San Clemente.

Jaramillo: Uh-huh. Okay. So the long and the short of it is they did not arrest him?

Downing: No, they did not. But that was a decision made by Bill Hunt.

Jaramillo: How long ago was this?

Downing: This was . . . I just got the phone call five minutes ago.

Jaramillo: I’m going to call Don [Haidl] right now.

Downing: Okay. All right, sir.


Source: OC Sheriff’s Department
Link Posted: 12/7/2003 6:57:25 PM EDT
[#2]
[b] Reality Check![/b]

H&S 11357(b) Possession of less than 28 Grams of Marijuana is not a Bookable or Jailable offense.  It is an Infraction handled in Traffic court. Those convicted can only be sentenced to a small fine, or may chose to take a one day diversion, similar to traffic school. No one is arrested or taken to jail for H&S 11357(b).  Haidles bail would not be revoked for a H&S 11357(b) ticket.
Marijuana paraphernalia, such as a glass multicolored pot pipe, even with marijuana residue, is not illegal to possess in California.  Pot pipes are rarely collected as evidence, because they are not illegal to possess.

Haidl and Jaramillo have been surrounded by controversy for their entire tenure.  Bill Hunt has had a stellar reputation till this point and is well liked and respected by the So Cal LE community.  I've never heard of Deputy Roche.  
Link Posted: 12/7/2003 7:02:20 PM EDT
[#3]
[Paraphrase AR15Fan]When the judge tells you to keep you behind out of criminal situations, and not to violate the law, he means it.[/Paraphrase AR15Fan]

Unless you are connected to the cops, apparently. I guess somebody should have short-circuited the review-of-bail situation and snapped his neck for him, right? And maybe paralyzed the officers who hid his screwup, for good measure. Then you could tell us they should all have known better.

Link Posted: 12/8/2003 5:05:17 AM EDT
[#4]
AR15fan

Do you have a dog in this fight ?

The rape thing is BAD NEWS but the pot ?  I though pot was pretty much legal in CA if it was below a certain weight. How many joints would 3.5 gram roll ?

Link Posted: 12/8/2003 5:25:12 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
AR15fan

Do you have a dog in this fight ?

The rape thing is BAD NEWS but the pot ?  I though pot was pretty much legal in CA if it was below a certain weight. How many joints would 3.5 gram roll ?

View Quote


Depends on how fat you roll them, but at least two, maybe three. Or you could roll one blunt. When I first read yer post I thought of the Cheech and Chong skit lets make a dope deal, when they ask the question, how may joints are in a lid.
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 6:01:09 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Asked if he ordered deputies to bury evidence in the drug bust, Jaramillo told the Weekly, "Nope, nope, nope. I didn’t give such an order . . . I never used the word bury."
View Quote


It depends on what the meaning of the word "is", is... [:D]

But he admitted that he did hope to keep the incident—which he called a "chump-change infraction"--out of the press. "I may have said, ‘Don’t put [the incident] on the log,’ but I had just woken up."

Jaramillo denied that his intervention was improper or illegal. [red]"There was nothing unusual about this," he said. "We’ve done this many times for politicians."[/red]
View Quote


And anyone else with connections too eh??

"I’m not so naïve as to try to get something buried," Jaramillo said. He added that everything he discussed that night with Downing was [red]"standard operating procedure."[/red]

Jaramillo also adamantly denied that he knew Haidl had been smoking pot. "They did not tell me that," he said.

The assistant sheriff says he welcomes the grand jury investigation. "It isn’t a cover-up," he said. "It’s a procedural thing about keeping embarrassing things out of the press . . . [blue]I don’t want good people like the Haidls to be beaten on."[/blue]

The San Clemente pot case isn’t the only time Jaramillo allegedly interceded in a criminal matter for young Haidl. Jaramillo became the subject of controversy during the investigation of the 2002 videotaped gang bang of an unconscious 16-year-old girl in Haidl’s Newport Beach house. Prosecutors claim Jaramillo advised the Haidl family not to answer their questions.

"I was not involved," Jaramillo told the Weekly. "I played no role. I played no part. I didn’t talk to the boy or anyone else."

Along with Kyle Joseph Nachreiner and Keith James Spann, both also 18, Haidl now faces a March trial for allegedly raping and then sexually molesting the girl with a cigarette, Snapple bottle and a pool stick. Defense lawyers claim the girl consented to the sex before she passed out and the teenagers activated the video camera. All three teenagers face life in prison if convicted.

Downing, Hunt and Haidl did not respond to interview requests.


View Quote





I understand perfectly...

One justice for the cops/politicians families, another for the rest of us...

The US is just as corrupt as anywhere else....
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 6:19:42 AM EDT
[#7]
AS Haidl's son is going through a very traumatic experience at this time.

The mary-jane was for the stress he is going through.

If you ain't connected you're just human refuse.

Now, what would happen to you if you were out on bail for a rape charge and the fuzz busted you puffing on a roach? WooHoo!!

Sweep it under the rug.Keeping him out of the pokey will save us taxpayers a lot of money.

Good thing, too;the war on drugs would've claimed another victim...
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 6:44:08 AM EDT
[#8]
If it was my kid I would have told the deputies to write the ticket.
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 6:56:18 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
If it was my kid I would have told the deputies to write the ticket.
View Quote


My dad would have asked them to TASER me. I shit you not.
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 6:56:55 AM EDT
[#10]
Man, coppers are corrupt. What a sorry profession. Don't give me the "we protect you" shit because a copper's never done anything for me, and most drive around the suburbs acting like they're doing society a favor anyway. Hypocrites.  
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 9:20:44 AM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
AR15fan

Do you have a dog in this fight ?
View Quote


Iv'e met 2 of the 4 cops mentioned in the article. I work in Southern California LE. I just thought it was an intereesting article, but was also bothered by the factual inaccuracies.  I would expect an "alternative" newspaper to be better versed in Marijuana laws...
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 9:26:47 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Now, what would happen to you if you were out on bail for a rape charge and the fuzz busted you puffing on a roach? WooHoo!!
View Quote


Nothing, and that's what bothered me about the article. Possession of Marijuana is essentially a traffic ticket. You can not be arrested for marijuana possession. Your bail would not be revoked. When I ran you for warrants the dispatcher wouldnt even tell me you were out on bail (that's a flaw in the system that should be corrected).

Bail is only revoked when you taken into CUSTODIAL arrest for a bookable Misdemeanor or Felony. A cite & release infraction will never revoke your bail.

IMO the cops involved fucked up. They should have wrote Haidl the ticket if it was really his weed. However when you have a small quantity, and several people in the car, sometimes it's impossible to establish who it belongs to. There is no such thing as joint possession of illegal drugs in this state. You have to pin it on one person or they all walk.

I guess what really bothers me about the article is the inaccuracies about bail revocation and marijuana law create the illusion of a creater controversy than really exist.  It appears to me that this was all about keeping the Senior Haidles name out of the paper, and nothing about keeping the Jr Haidl out on bail. The OC Weekly would have you believe it was all about the kids bail.


BTW; Jarimillo said one thing that was completely true.  Marijuana possession is a [b]"chump-change infraction."[/b]
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 10:07:22 AM EDT
[#13]
Its was all about dad and keeping him out of the papers. Friends helping friends helps the world go round.
Link Posted: 12/8/2003 10:20:23 AM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
If it was my kid I would have told the deputies to write the ticket.
View Quote


I recently noticed that a friend of my daughter's boyfriend who has been over to the house a couple of times was a stoner. I told her to let him know that if I ever caught him in my house with weed I would beat the living shit out of him and then call the cops. He hasn't been back since.
Link Posted: 12/12/2003 1:18:30 PM EDT
[#15]
This one is back in the news.

The OC Grand Jury is investigating.

Kcal9 just played 3 audio tapes. the first is the field deputy to the Watch Commander, then the Watch Commander to the assistant Sheriff, then the watch commander to the field deputy.  Tape sounds real bad, for everyone involved.
Link Posted: 12/12/2003 1:24:49 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
This one is back in the news.

The OC Grand Jury is investigating.

Kcal9 just played 3 audio tapes. the first is the field deputy to the Watch Commander, then the Watch Commander to the assistant Sheriff, then the watch commander to the field deputy.  Tape sounds real bad, for everyone involved.
View Quote


Yeah.I saw that on Ch.9.

Heads are gonna roll...
Link Posted: 12/12/2003 1:33:09 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
Quoted:
This one is back in the news.

The OC Grand Jury is investigating.

Kcal9 just played 3 audio tapes. the first is the field deputy to the Watch Commander, then the Watch Commander to the assistant Sheriff, then the watch commander to the field deputy.  Tape sounds real bad, for everyone involved.
View Quote


Yeah.I saw that on Ch.9.

Heads are gonna roll...
View Quote



I was sympathetic to the deputy, until the end of the last tape. When he talked about not putting it in his log. Even if the supervisor says dont arrest this guy, it still happened, you log it the way it happened. Found three men smoking marijuana, couldnt establish ownership of baggy of marijuana, all three released, marijuana booked for destruction...
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top