What kind of a statement are you attempting to make with yours? Some I find extrememly amusing and even funny. But most are a lousy attempt at best at trying to make yourself look like a bad-ass.

What statement does your avatar make?

Avatar-envy!

Quoted: Avatar-envy!

Better than penis envy, like most have in here.

Why dont you chip in some cash and try to do better?

Quoted: Why dont you chip in some cash and try to do better?

You mean like, pay?!!!  No thanks, paying to hang with you kids would be like paying to have sex. Something I have never done.

Mine says I love my dog.  I think most other people chose them because they like them.  Same reasons I chose mine.

Why don't you post what you would put up if you weren't such a cheap bastard and had a real membership?

Quoted: Quoted: Avatar-envy! Better than penis envy, like most have in here.

Go ahead and tell us who here hurt your feelings.  Are you sad?  Expressing you feelings might help.

I think just having an avatar REALLY illustrates that the member supports this website by having paid for a membership.  I think before trashing team members you should maybe consider grabbing one yourself.  Otherwise this arguement you present seems rather hollow, like your head.

Byte-me.

he's got sand in his clit 'cuz nobody missed him.

Quoted: Quoted: Why dont you chip in some cash and try to do better? You mean like, pay?!!!  No thanks, paying to hang with you kids would be like paying to have sex. Something I have never done.

If you don't like us....LEAVE.  Trust me, there would only be dry eyes around here.  Plus, your mental capabilities are lacking - your last comment about "paying to hang would be like paying to have sex" makes no sense.  Paying to have sex would be paying to have fun.  So technically, your intent and the outcome of what you said are totally in conflict.

Go away gracefully....wait....no....no chance for that now.  Just go away.

Mine's new. It's my Dad standing on the tarmac with his new jump wings on his uniform circa 1950. Thats' a P-51 Mustang in the background.
Do you like it?

Quoted: Mine's new. It's my Dad standing on the tarmac with his new jump wings on his uniform circa 1950. Thats' a P-51 Mustang in the background. Do you like it?

Hell I do, pretty dang cool.

I like mine the best.

Quoted: Mine's new. It's my Dad standing on the tarmac with his new jump wings on his uniform circa 1950. Thats' a P-51 Mustang in the background. Do you like it?

I think it's a great avatar.

Quoted: Quoted: Why dont you chip in some cash and try to do better? You mean like, pay?!!!  No thanks, paying to hang with you kids would be like paying to have sex. Something I have never done.

Right...you've never had to pay for dinner and a movie or some shit to get a lady into bed? I find that really hard to believe...

Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Avatar-envy! Better than penis envy, like most have in here. Go ahead and tell us who here hurt your feelings.  Are you sad?  Expressing you feelings might help.

lol, sounds to me like a lot of you got your feelings hurt.

I know what you mean vic, some of the avatars have me wondering. Welcome back --- that was a short deployment.

Quoted: Quoted: Why dont you chip in some cash and try to do better? You mean like, pay?!!!  No thanks, paying to hang with you kids would be like paying to have sex. Something I have never done.

Kids????  We are kids??

WHo went and pretended their unit was being deployed?

WHo lied?

Who posted TWICE taht they were leaving yet never did?

And last of all...who went and just spent time playing soldier in a WWII re-enactment?

Get bent you





Sgtar15

Good post Vic_vega. Your doing a real good job...keep up the good work*thumbs up*

Quoted: Quoted: Mine's new. It's my Dad standing on the tarmac with his new jump wings on his uniform circa 1950. Thats' a P-51 Mustang in the background. Do you like it? Hell I do, pretty dang cool.

I think its pretty freakin cool myself!

<=====  Don't hate this one do you?

Quoted: Quoted: Avatar-envy! Better than penis envy, like most have in here.

Is THAT the best you can do?

Mine makes my pee-pee bigger.

Quoted: Quoted: Why dont you chip in some cash and try to do better? You mean like, pay?!!!  No thanks, paying to hang with you kids would be like paying to have sex. Something I have never done.

Gay men usually don't. But, I suppose those bathhouse due are little pricey..

Why don't leave now and save yourself from the pummeling you about to receive.

Avatars?

I simply hate you.

Savvy?

Quoted: I hate a lot of you guy's avatars.

I don't give two shake's of a dead rat's ass whether you like my avatar or not.

Oh, and your grammar sucks too.

Maybe you should read rule #6 one more time.

6.) No “trolling”. This means posting controversial or “valueless” topics simply to gain attention or anger other members. There is a big difference in a “trolling” topic and a thread started just to have fun!


Who the fuck cares what you think.

I thought TROLLING threads belonged in the "Bear Pit."

Mike

Quoted: All I know is Vic_Vega is a really boss, super cool username. You must be pretty awesome with a username like that.

Thanks. And yes, I was a technical advisor on the set of Reservoir Dogs for Mr. Blonde's character.

You anywhere near Arizona? Why don't we get togehter sometime for a Beer and we'll talk about you opinions on Avatars, Bad-Asses and such...
--RR

I think Vic's panty shield is bunched up and he's having a not so fresh feeling moment.

NICE tank, there, RR!

Quoted: Quoted: All I know is Vic_Vega is a really boss, super cool username. You must be pretty awesome with a username like that. Thanks. And yes, I was a technical advisor on the set of Reservoir Dogs for Mr. Blonde's character.

Yeah, sure.

Then one of these people must be you:

Other crew
Dink Adams .... best boy grip
L. Wayne Alexander .... legal services
Jacqueline Aronson .... set costumer
Roger Avary .... creator: Dog Eat Dog logo
Marina Bailey .... unit publicist
Wendy Baker .... production assistant
Warren Betts .... public relations: Live America
Ian Blackman .... reader
Rebecca Boss .... special thanks (as Becka Boss)
Joey D. Brown .... electrician
Juliet Brown .... assistant coordinator
Timothy Carey .... dedicatee
Michael D. Carlin .... special thanks (as Mike Carlon)
Doug Cawker .... apprentice editor
Suzanne Celeste .... dialect coach
Michael Chaskes .... apprentice editor
Merry Cheers .... special thanks
Linda R. Chen .... unit photographer (as Linda Chen)
Yun-Fat Chow .... dedicatee (as Chow Yuen Fat)
David Coffee .... driver
Bruce Comtois .... set security
Roger Corman .... dedicatee
Steve Croff .... driver
R. Blaine Currier .... production accountant
Jay Dahlquist .... best boy electric
André De Toth .... dedicatee (as Andre DeToth)
Kelley Dixon .... first assistant editor
Michael Doggett .... transportation consultant (as Mike Doggett)
Ziad Doueiri .... first assistant camera
Melinda Eshelman .... assistant wardrobe (as Melinda Adele Eshelman)
Peter Flood .... special thanks
Carrie Elizabeth Foresman .... first assistant editor
Billy A. Fox .... location manager
Ben C. Giller .... transportation captain
Terry Gilliam .... special thanks
Jean-Luc Godard .... dedicatee
Judith E. Goldman .... assistant location manager (as Judy Goldman)
Carlos K. Goodman .... legal services
Debra Grieco .... assistant accountant
Ulu Grosbard .... special thanks
Randall Guth .... second assistant camera
Mary Claire Hannan .... costume supervisor
Jim Harper .... reader
Alison Howard .... special thanks
Nancy Lynn Hurlbut .... assistant music supervisor
Cathryn James .... special thanks (as Cathryn Jaymes)
Enid L. Kantor .... production coordinator
Ross Katz .... grip (as Ross Andrews Katz)
Jeannie H. Kelly .... craft service
Peggy Kennedy .... casting associate
Martin Kitrosser .... script supervisor
Mark Lass .... negative cutter
John Lieberman .... thanks (as Mr. John Lieberman)
James Lowder .... transportation coordinator (as James R. Lowder)
Greg R. McCullough .... gaffer
Kenneth McGregor .... special thanks (as Kenneth McGreggor)
Brandon McNaughton .... apprentice editor
Stephanie Jo Meckler .... legal services: Live America
Jean-Pierre Melville .... dedicatee (as Jean Pierre Melville)
Neil Michaels .... electrician
Melanie Molyneux .... set medic
Mark Emery Moore .... steadicam operator (as Mark Moore)
Kathy Nelson .... music supervisor: MCA
Katie Nilson .... best boy electric
Harry Nilsson .... special thanks
Lilly Parker .... special thanks
Nancy Perry .... first assistant editor
Steve Petix Jr. .... assistant wardrobe
Steve Petty Jr. .... assistant wardrobe
Laurie Post .... special thanks
Jennifer Pyken .... post-production assistant
Karyn Rachtman .... music supervisor
Cathy Ragona .... assistant: Richard N. Gladstein
Moses Robinson .... production assistant
Chris J. Rossi .... grip (as Chris Rossi)
Stephen Sacks .... special thanks
Tony Safford .... special thanks
Scott Sampler .... production assistant
Mary Santiago .... extras casting
Michelle Satter .... special thanks
Tony Scott .... special thanks
Stacey Sher .... special thanks (as Stacy Sher)
Alan Sherrod .... director of photography: second unit
Lynn Smith .... first assistant steadicam operator
Robert John Speer .... driver
Robert John Speer .... generator operator
Boyd Steer .... negative cutter
Todd M. Thaler .... special thanks (as Todd Thaler)
Miles Thomas .... best boy grip
Lawrence Tierney .... dedicatee
Nicholas Toth .... animal handler
Elizabeth Treadwell .... production assistant
Bill Unger .... special thanks
Ric Urbauer .... key grip
Lionel White .... dedicatee
William W. Williams .... first assistant editor
Dennis K. Wilson .... dolly grip
Chuck Winston .... color timer
Frank H. Woodward .... electrician
Greta von Steinbauer .... special thanks (as Greta Vonsteinbauer)
R. Blaine Currier .... production assistant (uncredited)
Michael Mendelsohn .... financial consultant (uncredited)
Jon Sperry .... dialect coach: Hervey Keitel (uncredited)

I thought your unit got called up, what happened?

TBK1 must not be here or this thread would be locked already. Personal attacks on Vic_Vega and all you know.

Quoted: NICE tank, there, RR!

Thanks, here's the rear fender...

Quoted: You anywhere near Arizona? Why don't we get togehter sometime for a Beer and we'll talk about you opinions on Avatars, Bad-Asses and such... --RR home.earthlink.net/~the1_roadrunner/images/FatboyPaint001.jpg

So you have a picture of a bike. Maybe you even own one. So? Is that your claim to fame for being a BADDASS?

Quoted: I thought your unit got called up, what happened?

There was another thread that has disappeared. He went to a WW2 reenactment.

Anybody that names themselves after a rusty, oil burning piece of shit.....

They do WWII re-enactments in Vietnam?

Quoted: Anybody that names themselves after a rusty, oil burning piece of shit.....

Quoted: Quoted: NICE tank, there, RR! Thanks, here's the rear fender... home.earthlink.net/~the1_roadrunner/images/RearFender.jpg

That is nice art work, you paint that ?? ??

WTF is going on here?

Why this punk isn't banned yet?

NsB

This will be my avatar, thanks to deimos




The Jolly Rogers was my first squadron in the Navy

Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: NICE tank, there, RR! Thanks, here's the rear fender... home.earthlink.net/~the1_roadrunner/images/RearFender.jpg That is nice art work, you paint that ?? ??

I came up with the basic concept, i.e. a skull transitioning into tribal flames. Then turned it over to a local guy here in Phoenix who is an absolute master with an airbrush.
--RR

Idiot!

HIJACK

Has anyone seen this article?  I think VV has gotten enough attention.

clickit.go2net.com/search?cid=290790&site=srch&area=is.clicktracking&shape=link&cp=info.foxnws&rawto=www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,103454,00.html

Candidates Confused on Gun Ban Tuesday, Vermont Gov. Howard Dean explained his support for extending the assault weapons ban next year because “deer hunters don't need to have assault weapons.” Gen. Wesley Clark says: “I like to hunt. I have grown up with guns all my life, but people who like assault weapons should join the United States Army, we have them.” Sen. John Kerry offered, “I never contemplated hunting deer or anything else with an AK-47.” Clearly what worries these senators is that people and not deer will be “hunted” with these guns. As Sen. Carl Levin noted early this year, allowing the ban to expire will “inevitably lead to a rise in gun crimes.” Ratcheting up the fear factor to an entirely new level, Sen. Chuck Schumer claims the ban is one of "the most effective measures against terrorism that we have." The most charitable interpretation is that the ban's proponents know nothing about guns. The “assault weapon ban” conjures up images of machine guns used by the military, which are surely not very useful in hunting deer. Yet, the 1994 federal assault weapons ban (search) had nothing to do with machine guns, only semi-automatics, which fire one bullet per pull of the trigger. The firing mechanisms in semi-automatic and machine guns are completely different. The entire firing mechanism of a semi-automatic gun has to be gutted and replaced to turn it into a machine gun. Functionally, the banned semi-automatic guns are the same as other non-banned semi-automatic guns, firing the exact same bullets with the same rapidity and producing the exact same damage. The ban arbitrarily outlaws different guns based upon either their name or whether they have two or more cosmetic features, such as whether the gun could have a bayonet attached or whether the rifle might have a pistol grip. While there were no studies or scientific basis offered for making these distinctions, the different names or cosmetic features were claimed to make these guns more attractive to criminals. With the sniper trial now going in Virginia, the media understandably focuses on the so-called “sniper rifle.” Yet, the .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle (search) used in the sniper killings was neither a “sniper” rifle nor an “assault weapon.” In fact, it is such a low-powered rifle that most states ban it even for deer hunting precisely because of its low power, too frequently wounding and not killing deer. By contrast, the much-maligned AK-47 (search) (only new semi-automatic versions of the gun were banned) uses a .30-caliber bullet that is actually well suited to hunting deer. The law never had any effect on crime. Banning a few percent of semi-automatic guns when otherwise identical guns are available only changes the brand criminals use. The law didn’t even stop the criminals from getting these guns. Even President Clinton, who signed the “assault weapon ban” into law, complained in 1998 how easy it had been for gun manufacturers to continue selling the banned guns simply by changing the guns’ names or by making the necessary cosmetic changes. The banned guns were seldom used in crime to begin with. A 1995 Clinton administration study found that less than 1 percent of state and federal inmates carried “military-type” semi-automatic guns (a much broader set of guns than those banned by the law) for crimes they committed during the early 1990s before the ban. A similar 1997 survey showed no reduction in this type of crime gun after the ban. Only two studies have been conducted on the federal law’s impact on crime, one of which also examined the state assault weapons laws. One study was funded by the Clinton administration and examined just the first year the law was in effect. It concluded that the ban’s "impact on gun violence has been uncertain.” The second study was done by me and is found in my book "The Bias Against Guns." It examines the first four years of the federal law as well as the different state assault weapon bans. Even after accounting for law enforcement, demographics, poverty and other factors that affect crime, the laws did not reduce any type of violent crime. In fact, overall violent crime actually rose slightly, by 1.5 percent, but the impact was not statistically significant. The somewhat larger increase in murder rates -- over 5 percent -- was significant, but not all states experienced an increase. The only clear result of the state bans was to consistently reduce the number of gun shows by about 25 percent. Features such as bayonet mounts on guns may not mean much to criminals, but gun collectors sure seem to like them. The bans have now been in effect for almost a decade, without any evidence of any benefits. Increased crime is not the biggest danger arising from not extending the law. Politicians who have claimed such dire consequence from these mislabeled “assault weapons” have put their reputations on the line. If the extension fails, a year after that voters will wonder what all the hysteria was about. Fueled by false images of machine guns and sniper rifles, the debate next year is likely to be very emotional. Let’s hope that the politicians at least learn what guns are being banned.