[b]* This is a family sight *[/b]

Any posting of porn, cartoon porn, or any other pix relating to anything even remotely close to the above will be grounds for immediate suspension of your posting priviledges!

Any pics of death, dismemberment or mutilation will also get you treated the same way...  This does not necessarily include the occassional pic of a prarie dog or gray squirrel as viewed from "UglyGun's" sights, but also is clearly subjective to how it would be viewed by others ([i]women and kids[/i])

If you don't like the rules, then LEAVE NOW -- we won't be playing these games any longer!

Lordtrader
Guns_Equal_Freedom


So far, this is the list as I know it...  I was told Drew qualifies, but I'd wrastle 10 gators to keep him on the boards...  He's my original enemy ([i]we've actually spoken via a twisted pair, and we're way too much alike![/i])

I havn't seen him around here.  Is it just me?

You mean "site."



You mean "privileges."

Uhmmmm   hmmm... CBIBLE, you just made the list!  [:D]

Cible missed "occassional" and "prarie".

Does this mean the humping smiley faces are going to be removed.  I know they offend me.

[sex].

OhmyGod.  Look away.

Simple rules, cut and dry...

It will give us more time teaching AntiUSSA getting his zpelinn rait.[:D]

So I guess this is sayonara, kaput, finito for me?

Lordtrader, I like you, but others aren't so inclind...

Consider this your WARNING!

 
 Well said and thank you.
This place was really going to the Trolls.

!!!!!You know who you are!!!!!


 [frag]

 

   [beer]

Where are the said photos? I'd like to see how offending they really are.... You know just so I'll know what we're talking about.

Anti;

What about links to "questionable" pix?

Yarddog,

I think you dont need photo examples of porn to understand it's content(unless...well...)
Same goes for pics of extreme graphical violent content, check www.rotten.com for examples, may catch some of the porn examples too.

Kuiper

Cbible:  Define "questionable"...  basically, if you aren't sure, it doesn't belong!

Would your Grandmother approve, your minister..?

[b]If you are all too damn stupid to know what does/doesn't belong here, then please, for the safety and security of all of us, sell your guns to somebody with an IQ greater than 17...  Because  obviously yours is lower!

You might want to clean up the "smilies" choices, also.

I am by no means a prude, but some posts are just one of the more "off color" smilies and nothing else.

Beside, they definitely don't add to the projected image of this board, which is considered "fringe" by some.

Does this count? [sex]

ANTIUSSA,
So you are the thought police now.
Well dude, you are talking out your "rear".
You posted in the "good lookers on TV" thread that Traci Lords and Samatha Fox are porn stars.
Oh my gosh, now some CHILD surfing on their computer will use the SEARCH function of their favorite search engine and look up Traci Lords and Samatha Fox.
Dang dude, you better add your name to your list.

If you think that a picture of a chick with big tits and a big smile is porn then I feel sorry for you.

So now are you going to include the "soft porn" pictures of TV and movie stars that make it to the boards too?

So your "friends" (Drew) are exemt from your rule. Some are more equal than others I see.

Instead of being such a penis-head why not just ask me in a private email to not post pictures that YOU find questionable.

I know that there are more than a couple of members on the list who don't mind seeing pictures of girls.

Hey, here is a suggestion, why not have a place on this board where we can be ADULTS. Gosh darn it, now THAT'S an intellegent idea (my 17 IQ points had to work hard to come up with that idea).

It's ok, I'll play by the rules.

[img]www.geocities.com/colosseum/1458/nc9.jpg [/img]

IMHO after seeing some posts by the so called Mods of this board I begin to wonder a little about how their chosen. Quite frankly, if you want to make a statement such as " If you are all to damn stupid..." etc etc, maybe you should address that subject in email so that the rest of the more mature members dont have to waste our time reading this senseless manure.Come on kids, play nice.   P.S. AntiUSSA, try to clean up your posts, you curse to often,and get rid of the "rude and questionable smilies......before I have to call Jerry Falwell on ya'll.

I misspelled "exempt" in my first post.

GEF

[img]www.jimsplace.com/jim/tl/tl03.jpg[/img]

Sorry, that's Traci Lords in the picture, you know, the one that used to be a porn star, now she stars on the Sci-Fi TV show "First Wave".

Will I now be banned because I placed a picture of here on the AR board? After all, she used to star in porn....

Nora Louise Kuzma  (Traci Elizabeth Lords)
Born 5/7/68 in Steubenville, Ohio
Moved with mother and 3 sisters to Redondo Beach California.
Attended Lincoln Elementary School, then Redondo Union high school?

Body: 5'7" tall, approx. 105 lbs., 34C-25-34, although this varies according to
several magazines, probably due to her baby fat years.

According to Traci Lords, after she moved to Redondo Beach, she started doing drugs
and mixing with the wrong crowd.  At 16, she ran away from home, and moved to
Hollywood.

At the age of 15, Traci obtained the Birth Certificate of one of her friends sister, who
was 22, Kristie Elizabeth Nussman.  She used it to obtain a Fake California ID, and
needing money decided to do modeling.  She chose the name Traci from her best friend,
and the name Lords after her favorite star Jack Lord of Hawaii 5-0.

She went to Jim South's Agency with a man, who claimed to be her stepfather, it was
later learned that it was her mothers Boyfriend.  He made it clear to Jim South, that
she would be making porn movies in no time, no problem.

Jim South revealed that most new models were nervous about getting nude for strangers
to photograph them, Traci was in no way shy.

According to her co-stars, she never once acted like an underage girl.  Nina Hartley said
she made love like a woman.  Tom Byron, her boyfriend and co-star, whom she had her
first hardcore screen scene with, thought she was 22.  Ron Jeremy, Tom Byron, and
Bunny Bleu all stated that although Traci denies remembering any of those days because
she was addicted to cocaine, she was anti-drug, always on time, and never seemed like
she was on drugs.

Her first film was What Gets Me Hot! at the age of 15, there was no hardcore sex scene
with her.  Obviously the film was re-released with the footage of her and Tom Byron added,
although what film this was shot for is unknown.  Traci claimed she made 5 videos a week,
but then changed it to she only made a total of a handful of films, they just used the scenes
in movies.

In 1984, she had made 12 movies, in 1985, about 50 films, and between 1984-1986 over
100 films.

Before her 17th birthday, her mother found proof that her daughter did pose nude, the
Penthouse, etc., and the films, but she kept silent about it, and didn't report it.

www.faqs.org/faqs/personalities/traci-lords/

Anti my fellow croc hunter, you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.

"Attention AR15.comers. Let it be known that the standard on this site dosen't allow for pornography of any kind. Any posting of such pictures in violation of this standard will force the suspension of your screen name."

Why do you always have to be so damn cross?
Do you have anger issues?
You remind me of Sam Kinnison sometimes. Always "yelling" (Or the internet equivilent of "yelling")

McSight

(BTW- Do any mags come with that 10/22 gatling gun?)

Well, I'll be darned!!  I actually agree with McUzi on something. I gotta go lay down for a while.



McShocked as Hell

Well, this sight is about AR's, not pornography,racism or homeophobia. Just my .02 and I'm a conversative. I want to leave the right impression to people visiting this sight, not the wrong one. Gun ownner's don't need enemies.

Open Fire) You are right. And there are a littany of other boards here on this site to discuss "AR's"-

But this is General Discussion- A place to talk about anything from that damn noisy nieghbor, to the pretty girl next-door.

And that is where the fine line is walked, and the site standards are usually tested.
This is the arena where the moderators have to "make the call" as far as what is appropriate, and what is not. Here in General Discussion.

If all you want to talk about is AR's, there are plenty of areas on this site to do so.

All this flaming and bitchin is why I left this site a long time ago. I agree it needs to kept clean, but it doesn't help when the "mods" act like children too. Two wrongs don't make a right.
McUzi got it right(believe it or not).You could have made a more professional plea to clean it up, then contact offenders by e-mail after that.
Antiussa...you need to learn some managerial skills.

Traci Lords the ex-porn star with an AR15 from the Sci-Fi Channel shoe "First Wave".

[img]www.firstwavetv.com/images/season3-03.jpg[/img]

Got nothing to do with being PC, there general user policy and there's Ed's rules. Dont like it, take your business elsewhere.

Some of the old guard may or may not remember how the GD forum on the old board got cluttered with porn posts. We cleaned it up to what it was before the crash. Did it then, and if necessary do it again.

And by the way. Well spoken McUzi.

Kuiper

a profound way to ease the bandwidth of this site.

Good Thinking. D.

www.azexarms.com

McUzi is correct, but this is the ultimate "AR-15 board", I kind of disagree with the status a "family site." I believe people need to monitor their childrens access. There are far worse sites more quickly accessed. We still need to be responsible members of this board and truly reflect a good public image. It's just the way it is, unfortunately we have become (gunowners) a minority group.

and no more pics of hillary or rosie also.mmk

Ahh yes, I have seen this may times before.

The cycle is nearly complete. The end is near.

I`ve only seen one set of pictures that I thought were in very poor taste and that was from Drew, who now seems exempt from the banning.

[b]1)[/b] Nobody is exempt from any of the rules...  The Drew remarks were obviously a joke!

[b]2)[/b] I posted what I did, the way I did, for a reason...  That reason is because it would seem the "kindler, gentler rules" ([i]as posted[/i]) were not being followed.

[b]3)[/b] This was all covered only yesterday in Ariel's thread.  The rules were re-discussed, but first thing this morning, we have breasts...  Really big ugly breasts!

[b]4)[/b]  If you don't want women and kids visiting this site, then just keep it up...  They won't be returning anytime soon.

[b]5)[/b] If you want an "ADULTS ONLY" section, then pull out your credit card and get a membership at one of the millions of porn sites available online, or search for a free one...  Just don't bring it back here!

I was referring to the dog+women pics he posted. I even asked if it was the same drew from the old boards when he did it again, I think there was a zebra in one. Remarks schmarks.
But it`d be nice to have some skirts around and they dont dig the porno much so be it.  

Some one posted a picture of really large, really ugly breasts?

Alright...which of you punks posted a picture of my Mother?

Concerning the where abouts of the porno outlaw Drew, I for one would like to see him back here posting his vicious flame attacks on anything that moves. Having a villain on the board keeps thing interesting.

Quote from the Godfather: "Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer".

I would think that so long as links to pics, not the actual pics, coupled with a warning of content are posted then every member can decide and use those things we call free choice and freedom without offending others who would have preferred not to see it. Is this really that difficult?

I would think so too, but I got into a mess of heat on the real site for doing just that. I posted a warning with the links, but I guess that wasn't enough.

Looking back, I realize that although the pics I linked to were directly related to the topic I posted in, they were still inappropriate for a weapons-related site.

Some of you may remember the situation surrounding the "questionable links", and I got quite a few e-mails defending my right to post a pic as a link with a warning, but I've realized that even though I feel like this is my home, I'm a visitor here, and it wouldn't be right to scare someone away just because [b]I[/b] personally don't find anything wrong with a "controvercial" picture or two. Even though they were just drawings and not sexual in nature.
Anyway, I'll continue to be on my best behavior, antiUSSA. You won't find me linking to any drawings of mutilated little girls with food being served from their bodies, OK?

[;)]

-TREETOP.

Quote from Treetop:

Looking back, I realize that although the pics I linked to were directly related to the topic I posted in, they were still inappropriate for a weapons-related site.

I've realized that even though I feel like this is my home, I'm a visitor here, and it wouldn't be right to scare someone away just because I personally don't find anything wrong with a "controvercial" picture or two. Even though they were just drawings and not sexual in nature.
Anyway, I'll continue to be on my best behavior, antiUSSA. You won't find me linking to any drawings of mutilated little girls with food being served from their bodies, OK?

-TREETOP.


What happened, did you find God?

Traci Lords with an AR?  I like it!

Lord Trader is a bad influence, Striker. When I told him I thought he should be hung, he said he was..

www.AK-47.net
that's all I've got to say.

So is it just me or is the chick in that first pic in this thread that Guns Equal Freedom posted totally and incredibly tasty?

I like those pix that leave a bit to the imagination . . . GEF, who is that chick?  Besides the future ex-Mrs. Ranger that is . . .  

Sure I did, when I was a child. The relationship I have with my God is completely irrelevant though, and not something I speak of here. The reason is that this site is based on our appreciation for a certain service rifle, not our religions or our spiritual beliefs. In the same way, it's not about naked female flesh.

This is simply an issue of us playing by the rules, as long as we know what the rules are. I personally don't find porn offensive, but I don't come to www.ar15.com when I'm looking for porn. I come here for many other reasons, but not to see flesh. There are plenty of other sites with adult content of all different varieties, only a click or two away. I don't feel there's any reason to drag it over here too.


I'm just very appreciative that we have a place here. If the administrators wanted porn here, I'd have no problem posting more smut than most of us have room for on our hard drives. I'm just playing by the rules.

..."Some of the old guard may or may not remember how the GD forum on the old board got cluttered with porn posts. We cleaned it up to what it was [size=6]before the crash.[/size=6] Did it then, and if necessary do it again."

Damn it! that's why it crushed!