eapon officials just opened a competition for a new 7.62mm Interim Service Combat Rifle to arm infantry units with a weapon potent enough to penetrate enemy body armor.

"The Army has identified a potential gap in the capability of ground forces and infantry to penetrate body armor using existing ammunition. To address this operational need, the Army is looking for an Interim Combat Service Rifle (ICSR) that is capable of defeating emerging threats," according to an Aug. 4 solicitation posted on FedBizOpps.gov.

The service plans to initially award up to eight contracts, procuring seven types of weapons from each gunmaker for test and evaluation purposes. Once the review is concluded, the service "may award a single follow-on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) based contract for the production of up to 50,000 weapons," the solicitation states.

"The Government has a requirement to acquire a commercial 7.62mm ICSR to field with the M80A1 Enhanced Performance Round (EPR) to engage and defeat protected and unprotected threats," the solicitation states. "The ultimate objective of the program is to acquire and field a 7.62mm ICSR that will increase soldier lethality."

The opening of the competition comes just over two months after Army's Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley revealed to Congress that the M4 Carbine's M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round cannot penetrate modern enemy body armor plates similar to the U.S. military-issue rifle plates such as the Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert, or ESAPI.

This past spring, Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Daniel Allyn released a directed requirement for a new 7.62mm rifle designed for combat units, prompting Army weapons officials to write a formal requirement.

The presence of a 7.62mm rifle in Army infantry squads is nothing new. Since 2009, the Army's squad designated marksman rifle has been the Enhanced Battle Rifle, or EBR, 14 -- a modernized M14 equipped with a Sage International adjustable aluminum stock with pistol grip, a Leupold 3.5x10 power scope and Harris bipod legs.

The Army adopted the EBR concept, first used in 2004 by Navy SEALs, in response to the growing need of infantry squads operating in Afghanistan to engage enemy fighters at longer ranges.

The EBR is heavy, just under 15 pounds unloaded, compared with the standard M14's unloaded weight of 9 pounds.

The Army's Interim Combat Service Rifle should have either 16-inch or 20-inch barrels, a collapsible buttstock, an extended forward rail and weigh less than 12 pounds unloaded and without an optic, according to a May 31 Army request for information.

Multiple proposals may be submitted by the same organization; however, each proposal must consist of the weapons, proposal, and System Safety Assessment Report. All proposals are due by 3 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time Wednesday Sept. 6 September 2017, the solicitation states.

In addition to the weapons, gun makers will also be evaluated on production capability and proposed price, according to the solicitation.

All weapons should include items such as a suppressor, cleaning, specialized tools and enough magazines to support the basic load of 210 rounds.

The competition will consist of live-fire testing and evaluate the following:

Dispersion (300m - function, 600m - simulation)
Compatible with Family of Weapon Sights - Individual and laser
Weapon length (folder or collapsed)/ Weight (empty/bare) / Velocity (300m and 600m calculated)
Semi-Automatic and Fully Automatic function testing (bursts and full auto)
Noise (at shooter's ear) / Flash suppression
Ambidextrous Controls (in darkness or adverse conditions) / Rail interface
20-30 round magazine to support a 210 round combat load
Folding sights
"Areas to be evaluated could include, but not be limited to: Controllability and Recoil, Trigger, Ease/Speed of Magazine Changes, Sighting System Interface (e.g., ability to acquire and maintain sight picture), and Usability of Controls (e.g., safety)," the solicitation states.

"Additionally, a small, limited user evaluation may be conducted with qualified soldiers," it states.

Milley told lawmakers in late May that the Army does not believe that every soldier needs a 7.62mm rifle. These weapons would be reserved for the Army's most rapid-deployable infantry units.

"We would probably want to field them with a better-grade weapon that can penetrate this body armor," Milley said.

The Government will be evaluating the performance of the various bid samples against each other using the below-listed attributes. The Government will be using a weighted point scoring system to perform its evaluation of the ICSR bid samples. The attributes are ranked in order of importance, for further details see Attachment 0003 (Bid Sample Testing Attribute Ranking Explanation). The evaluation will consist of live fire testing of the attributes listed below. These attributes are ranked in descending order of importance. The evaluation results will then be tallied to determine the overall rating.


1. Dispersion (300m - function, 600m - simulation)
2. Compatible w/ FWS-I and laser
3. Weapon length (folder or collapsed)/ Weight (empty/bare) / Velocity (300m and 600m calculated)
4. Semi-Automatic and Fully Automatic function testing (bursts and full auto)
5. Noise (at shooter's ear) / Flash suppression
6. Ambidextrous Controls (in darkness or adverse conditions) / Rail interface
7. 20-30 round magazine to support a 210 round combat load
8. Folding sights

NOTE 1: Attributes 2, 6, 7, and 8 above will be evaluated on a zero/full point basis. An Offeror whose bid sample receives zero (0) points for one (1) or more of these attributes will not be automatically eliminated from the competition; however, receiving a zero (0) score for one (1) or more of these attributes will adversely impact an Offeror's overall score.


NOTE 2: The proposed candidate will be eliminated from the competition with no further evaluation if at any time the weapon becomes inoperable during testing.


NOTE 3: In order to evaluate the bid sample, the Offeror must include the cleaning, lubrication and preservative (CLP) that is currently on the weapon. The Offeror must be aware that during the evaluations, the weapon will be cleaned with standard, military CLP.

Quoted:
Pure folly. Dudes are gonna love carrying 7.62 mags everywhere

Quoted:
Obvious answer 

http://www.eurooptic.com/Images/Products/Thumb/Desert-Tech-MDR-FDE-Rifle.jpg

Quoted:
I think it will get dropped and the M4 will continue.

Quoted:
Obvious answer 

http://www.eurooptic.com/Images/Products/Thumb/Desert-Tech-MDR-FDE-Rifle.jpg

Quoted:
Just pick the SCAR 17 so I can get cheap mags

Quoted:
210 round combat load?

They already have enough knee and back issues...

Quoted:


SCAR-H Anyone?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/United_States_Navy_SEALs_121.jpg/300px-United_States_Navy_SEALs_121.jpg

Quoted:


COTS only, that gun is far from commercially available, and they want submissions by Sept. 6th.

@Sylvan
@RustedAce
@GS5414
@JohnBurns

Quoted:
But not portablegorilla?

Quoted:
If they want to keep the same loadout with 7.62 they'd better get on caseless ammunition post haste.

Quoted:
Beats teaching troops how to shoot or actually employing weapons squads.

Quoted:
I don't think the 5.56 will be replaced for general issue.

If it is, they need to go to a 6.5 with 25 round mags. The case should be longer and wider than a .223, but shorter and narrower than a .308 (see what I did there?). The ballistics wouls be somewhere between a grendel and a creedmore. Using the DPMS g2 theory you could end up with a rifle that is the same size or lighter than an m4, with just the magwell being bigger.

And please don't have an ar charging handle.

Quoted:


Supposedly they have polymer 7.62 working so you can carry 210 rounds for 1.66 times the weight vs 2 times the weight.

Quoted:
210 round combat load?

They already have enough knee and back issues...

Quoted:


I think the whole point in "interim" is to move them to a 6mm-class round. So, while I agree 7.62 is a step back, I get where they are going.

Problem being...these interim solutions in the military often become permanent because no one follows through with a plan!

Quoted:
I'm glad we're able to use what we want:  5.56 for the doorkickers; 7.62 for the shooters.

And I'll probably be done by the time the thing ever gets fielded...if it ever gets fielded.

Quoted:
I'm glad we're able to use what we want:  5.56 for the doorkickers; 7.62 for the shooters.

And I'll probably be done by the time the thing ever gets fielded...if it ever gets fielded.

Quoted:
210 round combat load?

They already have enough knee and back issues...

Quoted:

Or it could XM8.

Quoted:
Going black means going empty?

V

Quoted:

And?

According to Milley, it wouldn't be an Army wide adaptation.

Quoted:


Look for this RFP and competition to do exactly what the XM17/XM18 did.
RFP 2015.
Winner selected 1/2017
Units getting the gun 11/2017.

This will happen very fast, and it will be pushed out to units just as fast.

Quoted:


20/30 round mags with a combat load of 210 rounds in 7.62. What's not to love!

Quoted:
Beats teaching troops how to shoot or actually employing weapons squads.

Quoted:

That isn't what he said.