User Panel
Posted: 6/20/2017 8:54:22 PM EDT
According to various news sources; Republican Representative Brian Babin of Texas' 36th District has introduced a bill to give members of Congress reciprocity to carry a firearm in the Nation's Capital City.
The bill allows Congress and only Congress to be able to carry in Washington DC. Normal everyday Americans need not apply. Furthermore, the Chief of the Capitol Police will issue a permit to Congress and tax payer fund shall be assigned to fund for their personal training. So just to clarify here. We have a member of Congress submitting a bill that would grant them a special exemption and carve out and on top of that get tax payer funded self defense training. Rep. Babin stated that he was sent to Congress by the voters because they wanted their country back. I wasn't aware that submitting bills that only benefited the political elite was being the voice of the people. Rep. Babin stated to TheHill.com: "The tragic events of last week make it clearer than ever that we need to take steps to enable members of Congress to protect themselves," Babin said in a statement. "With the increase in security threats to members of Congress and our staffs, this is an important and necessary step that we must take." Members of Congress would be able carry firearms in most places under the bill, even areas where guns are typically prohibited. That would include federal parks and buildings, the National Mall, lawmakers’ offices, schools and military bases. So now we have three Republican members of Congress from three pro gun States publicly supporting for a Congressional Carve Out. Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia, and now Rep. Brian Babin of Texas. All three are Republicans of course. Here's an idea. Instead of submitting bills that grant special exemptions for the few. How about actually doing what you campaign to do and push for real national reciprocity for all Americans. As a member of the law enforcement community I am covered under the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act. When it was passed, many stated that it would eventually lead to full reciprocity carry rights for all Americans. It has been thirteen years since the passage of LEOSA. That along with all the other special exemptions and carve outs cops get with magazine bans and gun bans. We know that carve outs for the government elites and their agents don't ever help the average American. This is wrong. Rep. Babin is wrong. I personally do not support this and I want National Reciprocity for ALL AMERICANS. Not just the political elite. |
|
Our government officials are the cream of America. The best we have to offer.
|
|
No. Hell, NO!
Pass national reciprocity. Everyone can carry. They are covered, we are covered. It's the only reasonable solution. |
|
|
|
Well if they pass that it might make passage for everyone else more probable.
Camel's nose maybe. |
|
It's not the target of an assassination that needs to be armed, it's the bystanders. Most likely the target won't see it coming.
*But both need to be armed. |
|
Maybe I should run for congress. I think I can pull off being a slimey politician long enough to get into office and then bam turn into a vulgar vindictive ass who calls out every democrat I can see... might get kicked out the club but dayum Thad be. Fun
|
|
I fucking love it when Congress passes special laws or exemptions for themselves!
|
|
|
|
On the Bright side, this may just be the foot in the door for us all to get "carry" in DC.
|
|
Our lawmakers really need a reality check. They should be concerned for their safety, like the rest of us. How fuck do we teach these people that they are just citizens, like the rest of us?
|
|
|
|
|
This is my congressman. He ran unopposed last year. I like him, but I disagree with this bullshit. CC for all, not some.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Well if they pass that it might make passage for everyone else more probable. Camel's nose maybe. View Quote Congress will do no such thing. Exemption to ObamaCare.... we're still fucked. Exemption to Insider Trading.... Martha Stewart goes to jail. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Maybe I should run for congress. I think I can pull off being a slimey politician long enough to get into office and then bam turn into a vulgar vindictive ass who calls out every democrat I can see... might get kicked out the club but dayum Thad be. Fun View Quote |
|
|
Previously introduced was this bill:
H.R.2909 - To require reciprocity between the District of Columbia and other States and jurisdictions with respect to the ability of individuals to carry certain concealed firearms, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (Introduced 06/15/2017) Committees: House - Oversight and Government Reform Latest Action: 06/15/2017 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform View Quote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How about no. Make it for everyone and I'll give it a hard yes.
|
|
|
Quoted:
+1 Also, "equal protection under the law." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Well if they pass that it might make passage for everyone else more probable. Camel's nose maybe. Also, "equal protection under the law." LE exemptions to AWBs, Mag Bans, etc ring a bell? |
|
|
Quoted:
Previously introduced was this bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2909?r=21 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Previously introduced was this bill: H.R.2909 - To require reciprocity between the District of Columbia and other States and jurisdictions with respect to the ability of individuals to carry certain concealed firearms, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (Introduced 06/15/2017) Committees: House - Oversight and Government Reform Latest Action: 06/15/2017 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Never had a chance. |
|
If this legislation was to become law, and a client with standing came to you, and of so inclined you agreed to bring forth an action, could you make a case? Is it possible to argue precedent? Could that create some degree of probability, however slight?
|
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes So other than sandbagging Texas because of a storm I see you are doing to same to our rights. Your bill to give Congress a special carve out to carry in Washington DC is wrong. National Reciprocity for all AMERICANS!As a Police Officer, I do not approve. For 13 years LEOSA has granted cops a carve out to carry nation wide and now your bill creates another carve out for a select few.I'm running for the NRA to push for more rights for ALL AMERICANS. Not just a select few.Lou4NRA.org |
|
This, the White House might have changed, but the faggots on Capitol Hill haven't. I'm still very anti Federal Government, too many liberal appointees and Republicrats.
|
|
|
Quoted:
What, a bill that actually affects the plebs in a positive way? Never had a chance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Previously introduced was this bill: H.R.2909 - To require reciprocity between the District of Columbia and other States and jurisdictions with respect to the ability of individuals to carry certain concealed firearms, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] (Introduced 06/15/2017) Committees: House - Oversight and Government Reform Latest Action: 06/15/2017 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Never had a chance. |
|
Certainly has been the opinion of state and federal Florida lawmakers, hasn't it.
|
|
Quoted:
So other than sandbagging Texas because of a storm I see you are doing to same to our rights. Your bill to give Congress a special carve out to carry in Washington DC is wrong. National Reciprocity for all AMERICANS!As a Police Officer, I do not approve. For 13 years LEOSA has granted cops a carve out to carry nation wide and now your bill creates another carve out for a select few.I'm running for the NRA to push for more rights for ALL AMERICANS. Not just a select few.Lou4NRA.org |
|
Quoted:
If this legislation was to become law, and a client with standing came to you, and of so inclined you agreed to bring forth an action, could you make a case? Is it possible to argue precedent? Could that create some degree of probability, however slight? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well if they pass that it might make passage for everyone else more probable. ^n The Courts are cool with having a ruling class. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.