User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 4:51:03 PM EDT
[#1]
what i want to know is how they program them to respond to flaggers telling you to get in the other lane, or unpaved areas during construction
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 4:52:02 PM EDT
[#2]
For what purpose?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:01:38 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For what purpose? fishing trip |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:02:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Pit maneuver
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:02:37 PM EDT
[#5]
How can the car give consent to be searched?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:03:55 PM EDT
[#6]
I was talking with an engineer (who was riding around in an autonomous car) and he told me it will not respond to emergency vehicles and he has to manually take control.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:05:16 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
fishing trip That's actually a good point and will raise a bunch of 4A issues in the future. The government will probably want some level of statutory authority for driverless vehicles. Remote kill switches too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:12:52 PM EDT
[#8]
will the cars pull over or out of the way for emergency vehicles? what about random mini detours around potholes ? cuz that is going to be some interesting programing...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:15:31 PM EDT
[#9]
It's all fun and games until somebodies cute puppy gets run over by a driverless car and the video spreads like wildfire across the internet.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:31:15 PM EDT
[#10]
Who is responsible for a crash by a driverless car? The owner? The manufacturer? Both?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:39:03 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's actually a good point and will raise a bunch of 4A issues in the future. The government will probably want some level of statutory authority for driverless vehicles. Remote kill switches too. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
fishing trip That's actually a good point and will raise a bunch of 4A issues in the future. The government will probably want some level of statutory authority for driverless vehicles. Remote kill switches too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:40:51 PM EDT
[#12]
"Officer, my self driving car was driving. I didn't commit those traffic infractions."
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:43:24 PM EDT
[#13]
Yeah, who would give consent to search? The passenger? What if I say NO ?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:47:18 PM EDT
[#14]
Aloha, Mark |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:50:06 PM EDT
[#15]
Consent to search is probably covered by an operating agreement along the lines of "by entering this vehicle you consent to search by operating company and law enforcement" on a sign posted on the window.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 5:53:08 PM EDT
[#16]
Sounds like a good way to move a shit ton of drugs.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 6:04:09 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
Assuming the car is empty as in on its way to pick some one up. Moot point as someone must be behind the wheel. And why would a cop need to pull over an empty car? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 6:20:57 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Moot point as someone must be behind the wheel. And why would a cop need to pull over an empty car? Cause someone put a body in the trunk
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 6:26:50 PM EDT
[#19]
Better question to ask is, who does the nice police officer write the ticket out to? The owner? The software engineer who wrote the software? The company selling the car?
Shit like this is why I think self-driving cars are highly unlikely to ever "be a thing". There's too much ambiguity created by their use. If you're using an autonomous vehicle, and drunk off your ass, can you be cited for a DUI? This is one of those things where they'd better get the underlying legal architecture into place before actually going to production and widespread use, or we're gonna spend the next fifty fucking years in courts ironing these things out. Frankly, I think the whole thing is going to founder just on the issue of insurance liability alone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 6:34:31 PM EDT
[#20]
what's the point of a "driverless vehicle" that still has to have a person in it for that "just in case" scenario?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 6:48:44 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Moot point as someone must be behind the wheel. And why would a cop need to pull over an empty car? To raise an issue regarding the condition of the vehicle? Not going fast enough or too fast because the limit changed and the "driver" isn't aware and won't move right for faster traffic? Malfunctioning sensor made it drive away after a minor wreck that it didn't know happened? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 6:55:18 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Moot point as someone must be behind the wheel. And why would a cop need to pull over an empty car? They had video on the news yesterday of a driverless Uber car running a red light. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 7:02:03 PM EDT
[#23]
Load up your driverless vehicle with dope, explosives, illegal aliens, stolen property or whatever you need to transport from here to there. The cops would never have a reason to be suspicious of a driverless vehicle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 7:08:27 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Load up your driverless vehicle with dope, explosives, illegal aliens, stolen property or whatever you need to transport from here to there. The cops would never have a reason to be suspicious of a driverless vehicle. Put one of these CPR dummies like the one that was just "rescued" from a freezing car in NY in the driver seat and program the car to drive 10 MPH under the limit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 7:11:59 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Who is responsible for a crash by a driverless car? The owner? The manufacturer? Both? I would think the owner should be responsible unless it can be shown that the vehicle's programming did not conform to the industry standards that will inevitably be developed. In any case, the courts will ultimately hash it out. Just like they do now. I honestly don't see the liability issue as that big of an obstacle, seeing as lawsuits in connection with car accidents are already commonplace. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 7:15:12 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:That's actually a good point and will raise a bunch of 4A issues in the future. The government will probably want some level of statutory authority for driverless vehicles. Remote kill switches too. And within weeks hackers are going to break the security at some podunk sheriff's office and post the access codes on the dark web. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 7:16:50 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Better question to ask is, who does the nice police officer write the ticket out to? The owner? The software engineer who wrote the software? The company selling the car? Shit like this is why I think self-driving cars are highly unlikely to ever "be a thing". There's too much ambiguity created by their use. If you're using an autonomous vehicle, and drunk off your ass, can you be cited for a DUI? This is one of those things where they'd better get the underlying legal architecture into place before actually going to production and widespread use, or we're gonna spend the next fifty fucking years in courts ironing these things out. Frankly, I think the whole thing is going to founder just on the issue of insurance liability alone. I think the insurance companies will be the ones forcing adoption of driverless technology once it reaches a certain point of development. I don't think they care much about which party in an accident is held responsible if they can reduce the number of accidents and claims overall. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2016 7:19:43 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
LEO question. How do you pull over a driverless car? With a police drone! Duh! |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
.jpg)
