User Panel
Posted: 10/23/2016 9:59:25 AM EDT
|
|
That is as reasonable as requiring her protective details weapons to be deactivated until the first bullet hits her.
|
|
Off topic but: I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions?
They NEVER have an answer. On topic: WITHOUT QUESTION Hillary is for the TOTAL PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS OWNERSHIP. That IS her end goal. |
|
Quoted:
If she gets in there, it's going to be hard to survive. View Quote I keep warning people here that if she wins and picks up a majority Congress either now (probably unlikely) or in 2020 (who knows), this is a "game changer" for the gun rights battle, and I don't mean that in a good way. We will likely be on the defensive from that point until they succeed with their end game. Whether you like and/or intend to vote for Trump or not, everyone, PLEASE get out and vote so we can at least hang on in Congress! |
|
Quoted:
I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. View Quote That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. |
|
Quoted:
...................... That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. View Quote Yup............very sad AND DISGUSTING. |
|
|
Quoted: Off topic but: I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. On topic: WITHOUT QUESTION Hillary is for the TOTAL PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS OWNERSHIP. That IS her end goal. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Yup............very sad AND DISGUSTING. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
...................... That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. Yup............very sad AND DISGUSTING. Amen. I weep for what this country is turning into. |
|
Quoted: But the nevertrumpers don't seem to comprehend that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If she gets in there, it's going to be hard to survive. But the nevertrumpers don't seem to comprehend that. What I don't get is the dummies who want to hand congress to the Dems. Congress will be the only thing between the clintons and destroying the gun industry |
|
Liberals are crazy. They don't want you taking guns out of the home and they want them disabled at home. They are Crazy.
|
|
Quoted:
............. "The militia means the national guard and isn't an individual right" View Quote And I say.........."which of course doesn't answer my question". "For example Michigan's constitution says all persons shall have the right to own firearms for protection of themselves and the state". |
|
Quoted:
She's in. It's over What I don't get is the dummies who want to hand congress to the Dems. Congress will be the only thing between the clintons and destroying the gun industry View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If she gets in there, it's going to be hard to survive. But the nevertrumpers don't seem to comprehend that. What I don't get is the dummies who want to hand congress to the Dems. Congress will be the only thing between the clintons and destroying the gun industry I keep sounding that warning bell on here too (though I was recently ridiculed for it). Hope people are paying attention. |
|
I think it is reasonable to assume she should be in prison.
If for no other reason than FOR THE CHILDREN!!! |
|
That should apply to her at her home. No operational weapons
allowed at any of her homes. |
|
Reasonable is a one sided argument for liberals like compromise is always on the side of gun owners
|
|
|
Yeah, reasonable gun control, like you can own guns...just sign them out from safekeeping at the local police station, go do your range thing and your hunting thing, then have them back before gun curfew!
|
|
Quoted:
"The militia means the national guard and isn't an individual right" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Off topic but: I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. On topic: WITHOUT QUESTION Hillary is for the TOTAL PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS OWNERSHIP. That IS her end goal. The nasty guard didn't exist in 1789, tell them to try again |
|
Quoted: "The militia means the national guard and isn't an individual right" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Off topic but: I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. On topic: WITHOUT QUESTION Hillary is for the TOTAL PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS OWNERSHIP. That IS her end goal. Wow |
|
Quoted:
That should apply to her at her home. No operational weapons allowed at any of her homes. View Quote No. "Corrupt Oligarchy" means "special rights" are only for your OVERLORDS, not YOU. This is Neo Feudalism that we are creating here, got it? Return to your labors, peasant, and do not question your lords and masters again! |
|
Quoted:
What a nasty woman https://assets.nraila.org/remote.axd?https://d3uwh8jpzww49g.cloudfront.net/sharedmedia/1509256/hrc.jpg?preset=article https://www.nraila.org/articles/20161021/hillary-clinton-reasonable-to-require-guns-to-be-unusable-at-home View Quote The picture catches her in the middle of her typical trick at speaking engagement. If you watch her in front of crowds, at some point she will point at the crowd, open her mouth in a crazy smile/laugh, and wave. I was taught to do that in front of crowds even if I was pointing at no one in particular. It gives the impression the speaker has a personal connection to the crowd. When Hillery does it, it seems robotic and rehearsed. ETA: Clarification that I wasn't talked to do it like a crazy person, like Hillary was taught. |
|
It is "reasonable" to call her a liar.
It is "reasonable" to call her crooked. It is "reasonable" to say that she should be in prison. It is "reasonable" to say that she is the Democrat nominee because her primary process was rigged (use of super delegates). It is "reasonable" to say that she abandoned the men killed in Benghazi. It is "reasonable" to say that she should never be POTUS. Note that her "reasonable" is flawed and invalid whereas my "reasonable" is truth. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Off topic but: I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. On topic: WITHOUT QUESTION Hillary is for the TOTAL PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS OWNERSHIP. That IS her end goal. Wow |
|
It's also reasonable to ask that her husband refrains from raping women.
|
|
Quoted:
But the nevertrumpers don't seem to comprehend that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If she gets in there, it's going to be hard to survive. But the nevertrumpers don't seem to comprehend that. This. At least with Trump by the end of his 4 yrs we will still have a chance at defending our country. |
|
Quoted:
She's in. It's over What I don't get is the dummies who want to hand congress to the Dems. Congress will be the only thing between the clintons and destroying the gun industry View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If she gets in there, it's going to be hard to survive. But the nevertrumpers don't seem to comprehend that. What I don't get is the dummies who want to hand congress to the Dems. Congress will be the only thing between the clintons and destroying the gun industry Problem is they won't. They'll whine about it and say there's nothing they can do to stop her. The Rs in Congress are worthless at this point. I'm not saying not to vote for them, but I have absolutely zero hope that they'll do anything effective. |
|
Quoted:
.................. That's the reasons you'll get from liberals View Quote True but we haven't even gotten into them explaining the attached language of "the right of the people...................". Then that is usually when they get mad at me and call me names. And it finishes with me laughing at them and calling them stupid. Well, it doesn't always end there because they oftentimes get more angry and call me more names. |
|
Quoted:
Off topic but: I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. On topic: WITHOUT QUESTION Hillary is for the TOTAL PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS OWNERSHIP. That IS her end goal. View Quote This guy gets it |
|
Quoted:
That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. City and urban dwellers have no perspective or experience that would make them believe anything else. They don't know their lives are miserable and think everyone should be happy in their circumstances. |
|
She stated a week ago that it was "Incomprehensible" that victims of gun violence could not sue the manufacturers of guns that were legally purchased and then stolen.
|
|
Quoted:
That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in exchange for free shit. Oh, Becky got beaten and raped the other day. But that kind of stuff doesn't happen to me. Why do I need to change the way I live because bad things happen to other people? |
|
|
Quoted:
That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in excor dhange for free shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have always asked libtards how in the fuck a state can have a well regulated militia if the Federal government can outlaw individuals from having any guns if the states decide that their supply of guns will come from the people in their constitutions? They NEVER have an answer. That's because they don't give a shit. For the majority of Americans today, the whole concept of "protecting" anything is completely alien to them. They would rather let the government run every aspect of their personal and private lives in excor dhange for free shit. . This is sadly the truth. Most of the sheeple don't have any understanding of what they are giving away, or have been bought off with welfare or other gibs me dat. |
|
If they take my guns away then on toddlers will have guns
Fuck her! |
|
|
It is quite clear that that Hillary's perception of that which is reasonable and acceptable is not even close to that of the average American. This assessment of her is consistently true regardless of the subject at hand. The woman lives in a different world, and has her own set of standards which appear to be completely devoid of morals and ethics.
|
|
|
So no government regulations re guarding murding your unborn child but government regulations re guarding protecting your living child .
She a sick twisted bitch. |
|
The Clinton Crime Family needs to be locked away for America's safety. |
|
Quoted:
It is quite clear that that Hillary's perception of that which is reasonable and acceptable is not even close to that of the average American. This assessment of her is consistently true regardless of the subject at hand. The woman lives in a different world, and has her own set of standards which appear to be completely devoid of morals and ethics. View Quote I agree completely..........that's why I refer to her as a Satanic bitch. |
|
But, but what about the toddlers !?
#Toddlerlivesmatter, #IfyouhateHRCyouhatechildren |
|
Then it would be only reasonable for the Secret Service to do the same.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.