User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:54:27 AM EDT
Something is downright fucky. It says it was updated this morning.
http://wisconsinvote.org/election-results 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:55:41 AM EDT
[#1]
Milwaukee county?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:56:20 AM EDT
[#2]
Is this early voting so far?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:57:36 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is this early voting so far?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:57:49 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:58:09 AM EDT
[#5]
Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:58:17 AM EDT
[#6]
Early voting or just a page that they accidently set to show on the website?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 11:59:29 AM EDT
[#7]
But I thought McMullin was going to save us
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:01:20 PM EDT
[#8]
Whoa, this may be accurate. Feingold is about 6% ahead. Which is to be expected. There is a huge crossover vote where people are voting for a Democrat Senator, but NOT Hilary. This is seriously big news and a very positive thing.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:02:26 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%. Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:03:46 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, these are the final results.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far?
Sounds legit so I am going with final. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:04:42 PM EDT
[#11]
LOL Russia.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:06:43 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Whoa, this may be accurate. Feingold is about 6% ahead. Which is to be expected. There is a huge crossover vote where people are voting for a Democrat Senator, but NOT Hilary. This is seriously big news and a very positive thing. Impossible, the people who were wrong repeatedly during the primary assure us the election is over (they have been saying this since August). And this is WITHOUT the final okeefe tapes and wikileaks dropping. Perhaps this race is, at the least, much closer than some would really have us believe? Maybe we should all get out and vote 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:07:06 PM EDT
[#13]
It's over democrats. No need to vote now, just stay in your graves.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:07:06 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%. Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. I understand that completely. But I would expect more votes for Jill Stein. I would also not expect 20%. 10% would be huge. This is good news either way. When Hillary is getting beat soundly in a place where the Democratic Senator is winning, it means a lot of people who would normally be voting for a Democrat aren't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:07:19 PM EDT
[#15]
Screengrab of the statewide result. That is over 1.8 million votes already cast. I want to believe...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:07:24 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? I can't remember the exact details, but something similar to this happened during the Primaries. Before any voting took place, a website showed results. As it turned out, when people began to question it, the IT people were just setting up the formulas, etc to get the website up to speed... basically a test run with random numbers, to make sure everything was working. Maybe that's the case??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:07:51 PM EDT
[#17]
 Most recent local polls have the bitch up 7-8%  |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:08:31 PM EDT
[#18]
Feingold the loser re-invented himself as RUSS
No mention of his last name on his campaign signs.. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:09:39 PM EDT
[#19]
Welp this settles it, I guess I don't need to vote
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:10:03 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I can't remember the exact details, but something similar to this happened during the Primaries. Before any voting took place, a website showed results. As it turned out, when people began to question it, the IT people were just setting up the formulas, etc to get the website up to speed... basically a test run with random numbers, to make sure everything was working. Maybe that's the case??? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? I can't remember the exact details, but something similar to this happened during the Primaries. Before any voting took place, a website showed results. As it turned out, when people began to question it, the IT people were just setting up the formulas, etc to get the website up to speed... basically a test run with random numbers, to make sure everything was working. Maybe that's the case??? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:10:21 PM EDT
[#21]
Maybe they forgot to specify "test results."
ND has numbers loaded also, but the page specifically says test results. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:13:42 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I can't remember the exact details, but something similar to this happened during the Primaries. Before any voting took place, a website showed results. As it turned out, when people began to question it, the IT people were just setting up the formulas, etc to get the website up to speed... basically a test run with random numbers, to make sure everything was working. Maybe that's the case??? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? I can't remember the exact details, but something similar to this happened during the Primaries. Before any voting took place, a website showed results. As it turned out, when people began to question it, the IT people were just setting up the formulas, etc to get the website up to speed... basically a test run with random numbers, to make sure everything was working. Maybe that's the case??? Could be. These results would be a huge shock. I also wonder what the expected breakdown of early voting totals are compared to election day. This could also be due to many working people now filling out ballots early to avoid the hassle, while the FSA has all the time in the world to vote on election day. It could actually be bad for Trump if this is the case, since he is well under 50% and they are his votes going to Johnson, also why the Jill Stein numbers would be lower than expected if people were ditching Hillary for a 3rd party. I would still expect a lot of Bernie voters to go to Stein before Johnson. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:14:13 PM EDT
[#23]
http://www.channel3000.com/news/politics/Voted-early-but-changed-your-mind-You-can-get-a-do-over/42204364
Leftist media reminding early voters they can fuck with their votes. I wonder what happens if you try to "adjust" your vote to be for the same democrat a couple times. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:15:14 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? Started last Monday. My FB feed is full of people saying they have voted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:15:49 PM EDT
[#25]
Does that include or exclude the dead and illegals voting for Clinton?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:16:04 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? I can't remember the exact details, but something similar to this happened during the Primaries. Before any voting took place, a website showed results. As it turned out, when people began to question it, the IT people were just setting up the formulas, etc to get the website up to speed... basically a test run with random numbers, to make sure everything was working. Maybe that's the case??? http://www.codelord.net/images/posts_images/test_my_code.png Do you work where I work!? Lol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:17:01 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? Notional nonsense test numbers inadvertently released to internet by team preparing website for actual election? Or, alternate universe / time travel / braces. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:18:16 PM EDT
[#28]
/pol/ says it was some kind of accidental release of early voting/absentee ballots.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:18:42 PM EDT
[#29]
wouldn't that be a kick in the ass if FHRC lost because of a third party ticket,
the same way FWJC won in '92 |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:20:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Russians already rigging it for Trump
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:20:52 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Whoa, this may be accurate. Feingold is about 6% ahead. Which is to be expected. There is a huge crossover vote where people are voting for a Democrat Senator, but NOT Hilary. This is seriously big news and a very positive thing. Hold on there captain democrats controlling the senate is fatal. I hope this is not the case. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:21:19 PM EDT
[#32]
http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/10/21/early-voting-numbers-tallied/92513380/
223,000 have been returned statewide as of yesterday. Based on this being Milwaukee CO. only and the total is over the 223k, this has to be testing. Damn. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:24:37 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hold on there captain democrats controlling the senate is fatal. I hope this is not the case. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Whoa, this may be accurate. Feingold is about 6% ahead. Which is to be expected. There is a huge crossover vote where people are voting for a Democrat Senator, but NOT Hilary. This is seriously big news and a very positive thing. Hold on there captain democrats controlling the senate is fatal. I hope this is not the case. Feingold is expected to win that seat back for the Democrats. This would not be a shock at all, rather expected. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:31:00 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Started last Monday. My FB feed is full of people saying they have voted. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is this early voting so far? From my google search, early voting starts Monday. It is very weird. Any locals have more insight? Started last Monday. My FB feed is full of people saying they have voted. Good to know. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:33:06 PM EDT
[#35]
When the fuck did places start releasing early vote totals? That should not be happening! If this is even real?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:33:39 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Feingold is expected to win that seat back for the Democrats. This would not be a shock at all, rather expected. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Whoa, this may be accurate. Feingold is about 6% ahead. Which is to be expected. There is a huge crossover vote where people are voting for a Democrat Senator, but NOT Hilary. This is seriously big news and a very positive thing. Hold on there captain democrats controlling the senate is fatal. I hope this is not the case. Feingold is expected to win that seat back for the Democrats. This would not be a shock at all, rather expected. This. For some reason, people here love Feingold... And by people, I mean lots of people who will also pull the Trump lever. Don't ask me why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:34:15 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%. Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. You know, maybe so. If I had been a rabid Bernie-bro and found out she stole the primary, THEN see how veritas project, etc exposes further cheating, there is NO WAY I could vote for illary. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:35:15 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
wouldn't that be a kick in the ass if FHRC lost because of a third party ticket, the same way FWJC won in '92 i don't think Perot beat anyone. i would love it if Jonson came in 2nd it might actually make a libertarian party that's viable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:37:20 PM EDT
[#39]
Those shots are fake/beta testing. Look at the other names of write ins. Bernie can get more than the bottom few ckmbined.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:40:39 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Those shots are fake/beta testing. Look at the other names of write ins. Bernie can get more than the bottom few ckmbined. For president, none of those are write ins. I checked a WI ballot before I posted. It is the Reform, Constitution, and Worker's World Party. ETA: Beta testing is possible but why do it on a production, public facing, website? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:44:52 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For president, none of those are write ins. I checked a WI ballot before I posted. It is the Reform, Constitution, and Worker's World Party. ETA: Beta testing is possible but why do it on a production, public facing, website? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Those shots are fake/beta testing. Look at the other names of write ins. Bernie can get more than the bottom few ckmbined. For president, none of those are write ins. I checked a WI ballot before I posted. It is the Reform, Constitution, and Worker's World Party. ETA: Beta testing is possible but why do it on a production, public facing, website? I've only seen places release how many people have early voted, not actual votes. Something is wonky. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:46:17 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%. Maybe not in WI, but he's polling around 20% in some states |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 12:50:36 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
wouldn't that be a kick in the ass if FHRC lost because of a third party ticket, the same way FWJC won in '92 The irony of it would not be lost on me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:01:53 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%. Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:04:03 PM EDT
[#45]
I want to believe...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:07:56 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
i don't think Perot beat anyone. i would love it if Jonson came in 2nd it might actually make a libertarian party that's viable. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
wouldn't that be a kick in the ass if FHRC lost because of a third party ticket, the same way FWJC won in '92 i don't think Perot beat anyone. i would love it if Jonson came in 2nd it might actually make a libertarian party that's viable. We need all the karma we can get. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:11:48 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Something is funky, no way Johnson is at 20%. I would also feel better if Trump was at 48 or so. He is still well under 50%. Why not? There are a lot of pissed off Bernie voters out there. They could easily say fuck it and vote for Johnson. https://i.imgflip.com/1csqqh.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:12:43 PM EDT
[#48]
Interesting. Early voting does start until Monday for me.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:13:39 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The irony of it would not be lost on me. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: wouldn't that be a kick in the ass if FHRC lost because of a third party ticket, the same way FWJC won in '92 The irony of it would not be lost on me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 1:16:44 PM EDT
[#50]
I call testing, or outright BS.
Douglas, Ashland, and Iron counties all going for Trump? NO. WAY. IN. HELL. Iron Co, maybe. Ashland and Douglas? Yeah right. ETA. And Dane Co? LOL |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
