Quoted:
Quoted:
why doesn't the military make a "silencer" a standard attachment on rifles?
View Quote
Because it reduces ballistic performance and require subsonic ammo (see above) to work as intended. It's also an expense, and isn't needed in most situations. Usually they're not trying to keep a low profile about the fact that they're shooting at someone/something, and they certainly don't care about woodland creatures.
View Quote
Well, the normal detachtable suppressor [b]WILL NOT[/b] reduce terminal ballistics of a round, an integrally suppressed weapon like the MP5SD or the Sterling Mk5 will though have lower terminal ballistics since the barrel is ported to reduce the velocity.
Theyre not trying to keep a low profile..
Ever heard of the word stealth, take look of the photos of western special operations units in the past 5 years for example, the use of suppressors has grown and grown. Military forces are beginning to realize the benefits of suppressors, as suppressor technology has also advanced.
One drawback of even modern suppressors is the added fouling, but the added benefits are great:
- no muzzle flash/ nor blast blowing sand etc..
- Good dB reduction
- Confuses the enemy of the exact location
- Nowadays they are light/compact