Savitskaya came forward by the convinced opponent of the mass, general armament of all citizens.It reasonably assumes that by the affair of the protection of life, health, rights of citizens must be occupied the state, pravookhranitel'nye organs/controls.In the manner that this was with the Soviet regime, when citizens felt themselves out of danger and when on the hands of citizens there was no weapon whatever.True, I will note from itself, then it did exist?state.Now people, which are located with the authority, worry only about themselves, about their safety, about their pocket.


Yes even the idea of general armament, according to The the savitskoy, they press, lobbiruyut first of all those, who produce and deal in weapon, those, who await good profits from this dangerous undertaking.


Its enemies fought for the free carrying of combat weapon.They gave examples from their own test, they referred for foreign statistics, promising safety to all citizens.But they clearly deceived by cunning, speaking about the universal armament.Yes even is not calculated this entire undertaking for the simple people, which most of all suffer from the criminality, they perish first.Indeed pistol will cost dollars two hundred.In our pensioners, teachers and doctors, in millions of unemployed, to see, fully excess money in order to lay out two hundred dollars for?pushku?,which they cannot use in the case of need.Where by them against fattened and pumped?bratkov?,by which man to kill, that fly to slam.


To?prelestyam?,by introduced into our life?demokraticheskim?by bespredelom, some hurry to add even krovushki.It is small to us unemployment, homeless, addiction and alcoholism, it is small prostitution and AIDS, not preceded with The chovetskoy authority, now another weapon must be to all sold as chewing.To see, not enough today people they kill, it is necessary this to widely place on the flow.


So what examples and arguments did bring amateurs to postrelyat' into the living people?


One of them described that once he expelled from the entrance of his chosen addicts, who at first did not react to its observations.But it was worthwhile for it to carry out gun from the apartment, as addicts here tyuey retirovalis'.By the way, participant in the dispute described about this reported that house in it are stored several units of weapon.


Other supporter of mass armament, who sat on the platform for the public and who was represented almost by series engineer, described about how once to it, that was returning from the guests, the robbers, armed by knife, attempted to attack on the street.The very same reached pistol and packed those attacked the snow, having preliminarily forced them to go down trousers to the elbows.


It is interesting, on whom are calculated similar stories;to the naive people?Me these stories even more greatly convinced of the rightness Of savitskoy.


Let us begin from the episode of the dispersal/acceleration of addicts.


It is remembered, still years fifteen back overwhelming majority of us considered narcotics some savagery.In the time of the destruction of the country the addicts became the ordinariness, with which it is possible to encounter/collide in any entrance, and now, you look, and by no means toy pistols will become standard.


However, what?ubeditel'nosti?the given example, then i have the question:and if the stupified by a good dose potions addicts did not obey frail to the form muzhichku with the gun or with the pistol?It would begin to shoot?And it would kill?


But attorney more lately inquired in it:for which, citizen, man they did kill?For the fact that it?addict?But our present super-liberal Russian laws do not forbid to people to hunt, to mutilate, to kill themselves.But there were no other actions from the side of addicts.And villages (if it was not purchased) our hero for long years for the murder.


4 not randomly it mentioned about the possibility to be purchased.In the studio?and this did today become standard?openly sounded words about the right through rotted through system of pravookhranitel'nykh organs/controls, about their korrumpirovannosti.Therefore no one believes in defense of citizens from the side of state.Therefore are audible calls to the free carrying and the application of the weapon whereas such wild for the previous times (not for the beauty of its suit I will buy and bear).How correctly did note specialist -speqnazoveq, convinced enemy of the general armament of citizens?by any weapon, and by those more combat cannot be frightened.If pistol reached, then shoot.True, its opponents, who so/such zealously fight for the daily carrying of?pushek?,it occurs, very badly they examine a question, counting, for example, that the pistol of Makarov, that PM itself, by which are armed the army officers and militia, are not combat weapon!And such?spetsialisty?they undertake to judge subject of the debate.

However, concerning the second example, given?inzhenerom?,that here in more or less reasonable person appears the mass of questions.


Well, for example:if in the robbers with itself was not knife, but on the legal bases the purchased pistol?If they are not registered in PND, ND did not sit, then they would have the complete right to acquire and to bear weapon along the streets.


What would be then?Returning from the guests (really in the guests only tea of saws?)man with the pistol, and against it another person with the same combat pistol, that prepared to the crime.How would end this encounter?


But now I will be subdivided with my two examples.


By before last winter 4 in Sunday on the capital Chertanovskoy street it awaited its familiar.They a little were late.4, as some other rare passer-by, he became the witness of road incident.Before the light signal stopped?Moskvich?.Next to it stopped?Niva?.Young, high, strong/firm fellow jumped out from it.He approached?Moskvichu?,it opened/discovered door and began with cams/fists to beat the driver sat at the control.That first from the rapidity was lost, it passed impacts/shocks, but then in its hands it appeared, as I could examine from a distance, the carved leg first from the chair, then whether from the table, which it began sufficiently deftly to brush off from its enemy.Soon this struggle ceased, especially as light signal has already been switched and by went other machines.Young person, who satisfied his fury, rolled on?Nive?.But the driver of?Moskvicha?,toward the end of the battle that known how to be selected from the cab, wiped the blood, a little it resembled near the machine, being gradually calmed, and then also it left from the place of incident.


Judging by everything, to the moment/torque of fight someone of the drivers something completed on the road:the whether?podrezal?,the whether still something.4 then it thought:and if in someone of them or in both immediately did prove to be with itself firearm?It is confident, it would go in the course.And it is still unknown:only whether to fighters would be reached bullets.


Now I want to retell the history, heard many years ago from my former plant of associate.


In the beginning of the eightieth it was directed into Afghanistan to conduct predtorgovoye maintenance/servicing and repairing our hours, which were being supplied this country.Situation was there known what, and soon to it?na any case?they gave out pistol.At that time to it one of the Afghan specialists worked with it explained that to the moment/torque of obtaining the weapon it was uninteresting to the same modzhakhedam or to someone still.But the here now obtained by it pistol became for them very attractive thing.


4 this did recall, when it did represent that prove to be in killed in their entrances scientists (their murder they did produce although some resonance?on the murders of other citizens and they do not report) even and combat weapon, then they would be of even larger interest for the killers.But their weapon did not save.Or to us the supporters of the armament of population propose to purchase pistol, to learn to shoot it and every time, going in our own entrance, to obtain pistol, to place him on the combat platoon and, as if kopy from the American hits, to turn by them in different directions.However, well, delirium complete!Indeed this will not safeguard any armed person from podonka, which goes from behind with the trimming of water pipe or the piece of the steel framework, to say nothing of baseball bit.Today nemereno was bred?beysbolistov?.There and the assistant to deputy from LDPR, as they report, together with its chief/sponsor of mutuzil of such of that beaten of militiamen.Must be, they returned from the aging/training.


When I hear examples from allegedly the positive foreign experiment/experience of the general armament of population, then I think about the hypocrisy of those giving such examples.Indeed not edict to us their experiment/experience.Although I see nothing positive in the regular shooting by the same American schoolboys of my comrades.


The supporters of the freedom of possession, carrying and use of a weapon clearly were tangled themselves (or is made form, that they were tangled) and they attempt to tangle the population of the country in cause and effect of the discussed problem.Cart in front of the horse was placed.Not population must be armed, but criminals disarmed.And to make this to

If it normal. If we have the real state, if there was the political will to put an end to criminality, then, in the first place, state would not bring the country to present criminal bespredela.But, in the second place, when we have state, then during the postwar revelry of the criminality (not on present scales) marshal Zhukov in Odessa after several days it rigidly directed lawful order.And weapon then they did not give out to citizens, but they selected/took it in those, whom had it.And directed order combat officers, who passed the most severe/cruelest war and conquered in it, but not those, whom openly they charge with the mass corruption.And not those, who on the pluralism with the party building deal with the protection of law.