User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 8:53:08 AM EDT
[#1]
Pedophilia isn't hereditary.
My father is a pedophile, thankfully (for me) he was "allowed to breed", 43 years later here I am happily married with two kids, and I'm not a pedophile or a felon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 8:54:11 AM EDT
[#2]
If they were properly punished for their crimes you wouldn't have to worry about them breeding, they would either be in jail or dead.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 8:56:58 AM EDT
[#3]
Because they don't kill them anymore.
But it aint them breeding you need to worry about, it is them turning their kids into copies of them with abuse, or going out and raping or hurting one of your own because we don't do with them what we need too. but we have to keep them alive so some lawyers can have jobs, and so some corrections officers can have jobs, and so some governors cousins construction companies don't go under, and so service conglomerates can service conglomerate. So what if they get out and kill and rape? Think of all those jobs they justify. All those good kids who go to college and make the world safer one space at a time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:01:14 AM EDT
[#4]
Many terrible laws had good intentions. Once you legislate who can and can't perform the most basic natural act of creating life, it can never be undone, and will be turned against you in a second.
I will never support the state deciding who can and can't procreate. No matter what the noble disguise. I do however support erasing these monsters as they have forfeited their right to life when they make the decision to destroy someone else's |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:02:05 AM EDT
[#5]
If we are going to play eugenics I'd rather we focus on barring people with serious hereditary conditions from breeding.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:03:33 AM EDT
[#6]
Holy Totalitarian ideologies Batman!
This isn't a caliphate, our options of criminal penalties are deprive someone of their life, or their freedom on a temporary basis. Shit our system already creates second class citizens out of criminals, making them subhuman is a slippery slope, and to trust the government with that power is ludicrous. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:05:53 AM EDT
[#7]
...no
Once someone has paid for a crime and is a free citizen again you have no right to impose a lifelong punishment on them |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:06:55 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Yep, I said it. Violent felons or anyone that committed crimes against minors should be forbidden to have children. We aren't in the post-era of an apocalypse, we aren't endanger of becoming extinct due to low birth rates. (Japanese people are debatable) My wife and I have friends that foster children that are so fucked up I have no idea how they do it. They had to hide everyones toothbrush from a 7yr old girl because... well, I'm sure you can figure that shit out. Anyway, just a Saturday morning rant, probably a 2/10 one because not enough fucks or fuck you's. And yes I do know this will never happen, right now people are defending grown men that want to show their penis in a girls locker room/rest room. If someone proposes the bold statement above it would turn all the SJWs into rabid werewolves. Also, show me where this has happens?...no one is defending this, it is illegal and if someone was doing it they would go to jail |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:07:33 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If they were properly punished for their crimes you wouldn't have to worry about them breeding, they would either be in jail or dead. Except our justice system is not set up to punish anymore. Our justice system is set up to "rehabilitate" offenders instead. What our justice system really does is something else all together. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:09:33 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Holy Totalitarian ideologies Batman! This isn't a caliphate, our options of criminal penalties are deprive someone of their life, or their freedom on a temporary basis. Shit our system already creates second class citizens out of criminals, making them subhuman is a slippery slope, and to trust the government with that power is ludicrous. They are made subhuman when they lose the rights of a freeman. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:10:43 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Except our justice system is not set up to punish anymore. Our justice system is set up to "rehabilitate" offenders instead. What our justice system really does is something else all together. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If they were properly punished for their crimes you wouldn't have to worry about them breeding, they would either be in jail or dead. Except our justice system is not set up to punish anymore. Our justice system is set up to "rehabilitate" offenders instead. What our justice system really does is something else all together. So your answer is to give more power to an ineffective government agency? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:11:04 AM EDT
[#12]
The voting majority has no appetite for state imposed sterilization, provisioned by the courts.
Next question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:14:57 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So your answer is to give more power to an ineffective government agency? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If they were properly punished for their crimes you wouldn't have to worry about them breeding, they would either be in jail or dead. Except our justice system is not set up to punish anymore. Our justice system is set up to "rehabilitate" offenders instead. What our justice system really does is something else all together. So your answer is to give more power to an ineffective government agency? My answer is the same answer that is was in college. Go back to a punishment instead of rehabilitation. None of the extra shit they get now. Think how Sheriff Arpaio runs his jail is how I would run every prison. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:22:34 AM EDT
[#14]
I support the death penalty, but there is a problem with extreme penalties.
Simply because trusting the state with extreme power is rarely a good idea. District Attorney's, Judges, and Cops are human and often make mistakes, and in some cases they conspire to mislead juries. With the rise of DNA Testing we have seen the overturning of thousands of cases and sentences. Every few months I read stories of police or court corruption scandals. Our criminal justice system was originally designed to "fail safe" and find guilty men innocent if there was any shred of doubt, but over the years we have had politicians who were so "tough on crime" that they attempted to short circuit our societal safety switches, and when they couldn't do that they found ways to legally and illegally rail road motherfuckers into prison cell and electric chairs. While it is morally right to execute a murderer, it is much more morally wrong to deprive an innocent man of his rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:22:39 AM EDT
[#15]
Cause they vote Democrat
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:27:42 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I support the death penalty, but there is a problem with extreme penalties. Simply because trusting the state with extreme power is rarely a good idea. District Attorney's, Judges, and Cops are human and often make mistakes, and in some cases they conspire to mislead juries. With the rise of DNA Testing we have seen the overturning of thousands of cases and sentences. Every few months I read stories of police or court corruption scandals. Our criminal justice system was originally designed to "fail safe" and find guilty men innocent if there was any shred of doubt, but over the years we have had politicians who were so "tough on crime" that they attempted to short circuit our societal safety switches, and when they couldn't do that they found ways to legally and illegally rail road motherfuckers into prison cell and electric chairs. While it is morally right to execute a murderer, it is much more morally wrong to deprive an innocent man of his rights. I agree. I wish I was able to articulate it as nicely as you did. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:34:37 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I support the death penalty, but there is a problem with extreme penalties. Simply because trusting the state with extreme power is rarely a good idea. District Attorney's, Judges, and Cops are human and often make mistakes, and in some cases they conspire to mislead juries. With the rise of DNA Testing we have seen the overturning of thousands of cases and sentences. Every few months I read stories of police or court corruption scandals. Our criminal justice system was originally designed to "fail safe" and find guilty men innocent if there was any shred of doubt, but over the years we have had politicians who were so "tough on crime" that they attempted to short circuit our societal safety switches, and when they couldn't do that they found ways to legally and illegally rail road motherfuckers into prison cell and electric chairs. While it is morally right to execute a murderer, it is much more morally wrong to deprive an innocent man of his rights. fix the system, and the issue is minimized. Lots of good people die because we turn bad people loose. Either way we are sentencing people to death. Either way we are all culpable, though supporters of this modern chaos are quick to deny all responsibility for their actions in the current state of things. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:36:02 AM EDT
[#18]
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying".
Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:44:06 AM EDT
[#19]
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:46:02 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If we are going to play eugenics I'd rather we focus on barring people with serious hereditary conditions from breeding. No thank you Throughout history there have been scores of disabled and genetically hindered people that have contributed to the world. I'll pass |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:46:30 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying". Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. who are you to say what someone may do once they pay their debt to society |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:47:00 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
Violent felons or anyone that committed crimes against minors should be forbidden to have children. Let me guess, you probably consider yourself a libertarian too 
The stupidity I read on this site never ceases to amaze me 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:48:43 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:52:03 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
who are you to say what someone may do once they pay their debt to society Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying". Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. who are you to say what someone may do once they pay their debt to society Pay their debt to society? So we are defending those who destroy and hurt innocent people? If we really had any justice in this country we would use this more often and this wouldn't even be a topic of discussion. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:52:10 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying". Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. Do you even listen to yourself? So these same people who ignored the laws regarding murder, assault or rape are suddenly going to follow the law regarding reproduction? And if they choose to not comply, then what? Put them back in jail? What exactly is that supposed to accomplish?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:53:13 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:54:48 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? I wasn't saying she shouldn't be able to breed. She is free to do as she pleases but she shouldn't get money from me. I guess given the subject of this thread I should have been more specific. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:55:26 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". L O fucking L |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:56:29 AM EDT
[#29]
Forbidden you say comrade?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:56:48 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". You do know that posession of a 30rd magazine in NY is considered a "violent felony" don't you? Should violators of that law lose their right to breed under your guidelines? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:57:31 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do you even listen to yourself? So these same people who ignored the laws regarding murder, assault or rape are suddenly going to follow the law regarding reproduction? And if they choose to not comply, then what? Put them back in jail? What exactly is that supposed to accomplish?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying". Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. Do you even listen to yourself? So these same people who ignored the laws regarding murder, assault or rape are suddenly going to follow the law regarding reproduction? And if they choose to not comply, then what? Put them back in jail? What exactly is that supposed to accomplish?
Just throwing out ideas. If you were to see the kids I've seen you would probably lean more toward my side of things. I do see your point though, people wouldn't follow it, kind of like criminals and gun free zone signs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:58:07 AM EDT
[#32]
The same reason we shouldn't let gun owners breed...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:58:52 AM EDT
[#33]
I shudder to think of the world some here would create, given the chance.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:59:01 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You do know that posession of a 30rd magazine in NY is considered a "violent felony" don't you? Should violators of that law lose their right to breed under your guidelines? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". You do know that posession of a 30rd magazine in NY is considered a "violent felony" don't you? Should violators of that law lose their right to breed under your guidelines? Now you are just being obtuse. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 9:59:45 AM EDT
[#35]
Owning a hicap mag in NY is classified as a violent felony. eta beat.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:04:26 AM EDT
[#36]
If they can't be trusted completely in society with the same rights and privileges as everyone else, they belong in jail.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:04:35 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying". Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. Pass a law? To prevent habitual offenders from doing something? Regardless of the morality or constitutionality of this law, what on earth makes you think any badguy would abide by it? Let's pass a law forbidding crime, while we're at it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:08:02 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Now you are just being obtuse. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". You do know that posession of a 30rd magazine in NY is considered a "violent felony" don't you? Should violators of that law lose their right to breed under your guidelines? Now you are just being obtuse. How is he being obtuse? You propose another law than would only addresses feels. We already have enough idiotic laws. No need for more. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:08:16 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pay their debt to society? So we are defending those who destroy and hurt innocent people? If we really had any justice in this country we would use this more often and this wouldn't even be a topic of discussion. http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/pirates/images/6/6a/AWEHangmansNoose.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20121003130159 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
LOL i was not advocating for court ordered "tube tying". Just a law prohibiting violent criminals (felonies) and sexual offenders against minors from having children. who are you to say what someone may do once they pay their debt to society Pay their debt to society? So we are defending those who destroy and hurt innocent people? If we really had any justice in this country we would use this more often and this wouldn't even be a topic of discussion. http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/pirates/images/6/6a/AWEHangmansNoose.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20121003130159 I am defending them once they are out of prison/off parole all rights should be restored. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:09:19 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just throwing out ideas. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just throwing out ideas. You are going to have to wake up and realize that more laws isn't the solution. What we have is a problem with society and it can't be fixed or even mitigated with law Quoted:
If you were to see the kids I've seen you would probably lean more toward my side of things. I've seen plenty of fucked up, dangerous kids and most of them weren't the off spring of violent felons. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:13:34 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You are going to have to wake up and realize that more laws isn't the solution. What we have is a problem with society and it can't be fixed or even mitigated with law I've seen plenty of fucked up, dangerous kids and most of them weren't the off spring of violent felons. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just throwing out ideas. You are going to have to wake up and realize that more laws isn't the solution. What we have is a problem with society and it can't be fixed or even mitigated with law Quoted:
If you were to see the kids I've seen you would probably lean more toward my side of things. I've seen plenty of fucked up, dangerous kids and most of them weren't the off spring of violent felons. Wholeheartedly agree. My mistake was bringing up a "law" in the first place. Just wanted to start a discussion if the rights to bear children should apply to our most fucked up of people. I fucked my own thread up, oh wells. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:16:06 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wholeheartedly agree. My mistake was bringing up a "law" in the first place. Just wanted to start a discussion if the rights to bear children should apply to our most fucked up of people. I fucked my own thread up, oh wells. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just throwing out ideas. You are going to have to wake up and realize that more laws isn't the solution. What we have is a problem with society and it can't be fixed or even mitigated with law Quoted:
If you were to see the kids I've seen you would probably lean more toward my side of things. I've seen plenty of fucked up, dangerous kids and most of them weren't the off spring of violent felons. Wholeheartedly agree. My mistake was bringing up a "law" in the first place. Just wanted to start a discussion if the rights to bear children should apply to our most fucked up of people. I fucked my own thread up, oh wells. Our most fucked up people are gun nuts. They should be banned from breeding. And speaking, because that's how their bloodthirsty ethos is spread. Only when this is done can we stop the cycle of violence and hate and have a just and peaceful world. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:19:12 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Now you are just being obtuse. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why is Shaqueesha, who hasn't worked a day in her life, rewarded with more welfare for bringing a child into this world she cannot care for? Perfect example of why emotion should be left out of the argument . I agree 100% I get very mad at shaqueesha. But what about when it's your turn? Or your child's turn? When the bodies in power decide that shaqueesha can breed, but John smith can't? It would be a cut and dry law based on prior/current convictions. No judge could abuse it, nor any government panels of "people playing God". You do know that posession of a 30rd magazine in NY is considered a "violent felony" don't you? Should violators of that law lose their right to breed under your guidelines? Now you are just being obtuse. LOL YOU are the one that suggested that "violent felons" should by law not be allowed to breed. YOU are the one that said make it cut and dry based on prior/CURRENT covictions YOU are the one that wants to make it so judges have no leeway in the matter So just because I found a huge flaw with your asinine suggestion does not mean I'm being obtuse |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:24:03 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
fix the system, and the issue is minimized. Lots of good people die because we turn bad people loose. Either way we are sentencing people to death. Either way we are all culpable, though supporters of this modern chaos are quick to deny all responsibility for their actions in the current state of things. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I support the death penalty, but there is a problem with extreme penalties. Simply because trusting the state with extreme power is rarely a good idea. District Attorney's, Judges, and Cops are human and often make mistakes, and in some cases they conspire to mislead juries. With the rise of DNA Testing we have seen the overturning of thousands of cases and sentences. Every few months I read stories of police or court corruption scandals. Our criminal justice system was originally designed to "fail safe" and find guilty men innocent if there was any shred of doubt, but over the years we have had politicians who were so "tough on crime" that they attempted to short circuit our societal safety switches, and when they couldn't do that they found ways to legally and illegally rail road motherfuckers into prison cell and electric chairs. While it is morally right to execute a murderer, it is much more morally wrong to deprive an innocent man of his rights. fix the system, and the issue is minimized. Lots of good people die because we turn bad people loose. Either way we are sentencing people to death. Either way we are all culpable, though supporters of this modern chaos are quick to deny all responsibility for their actions in the current state of things. And what do you mean by "fix the system"? William Blackstone, and John Adams would disagree All presumptive evidence of felony should be admitted cautiously; for the law holds it better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent party suffer |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:26:15 AM EDT
[#45]
a thousand thoughts running through my head. what would she do with the truth brushes?
stick it into the toilet, wipe her ass with it, sharpen it into a shiv and stab them in their sleep? put draino on it? what? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:31:29 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
a thousand thoughts running through my head. what would she do with the truth brushes? stick it into the toilet, wipe her ass with it, sharpen it into a shiv and stab them in their sleep? put draino on it? what? Toothbrushes are "phallic" Her and her twin sister were taken away when the mother beat the fuck out of the father with a baseball bat when she caught him molesting them. But.... not for the reason you think. They would both molest them together, but when he did it by himself she went apeshit. The girls would not confess that they had been molested and the exam they were given proved inconclusive. The mother would not testify against her husband, and neither confessed. Never knew CPS could take children away if one spouse beats the shit out of another. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:31:33 AM EDT
[#47]
This thread will implode soon
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:33:12 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryIt already did. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:33:40 AM EDT
[#49]
We are swinging the other way OP, half of your subject matter is now allowed to vote in VA.
Give them room |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2016 10:43:16 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Toothbrushes are "phallic" Her and her twin sister were taken away when the mother beat the fuck out of the father with a baseball bat when she caught him molesting them. But.... not for the reason you think. They would both molest them together, but when he did it by himself she went apeshit. The girls would not confess that they had been molested and the exam they were given proved inconclusive. The mother would not testify against her husband, and neither confessed. Never knew CPS could take children away if one spouse beats the shit out of another. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
a thousand thoughts running through my head. what would she do with the truth brushes? stick it into the toilet, wipe her ass with it, sharpen it into a shiv and stab them in their sleep? put draino on it? what? Toothbrushes are "phallic" Her and her twin sister were taken away when the mother beat the fuck out of the father with a baseball bat when she caught him molesting them. But.... not for the reason you think. They would both molest them together, but when he did it by himself she went apeshit. The girls would not confess that they had been molested and the exam they were given proved inconclusive. The mother would not testify against her husband, and neither confessed. Never knew CPS could take children away if one spouse beats the shit out of another. in a million guesses I wouldn't guess someone would suggest toothbrushes are phallic. what happened to the children is horrible but that rationality is really fucking stupid. it s going to be a really miserable life for those children if they are afraid of anything with a length greater than it s width. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
