SUPREMES: STATES CAN'T FORCE VOTERS TO PROVE CITIZENSHIP

General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SUPREMES: STATES CAN'T FORCE VOTERS TO PROVE CITIZENSHIP

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:17:15 PM EDT

SUPREMES: STATES CAN'T FORCE VOTERS TO PROVE CITIZENSHIP
"...and then they gave away their sovereignty."

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:17:36 PM EDT

[#1]

first

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:17:54 PM EDT

[#2]

cant see shit

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:19:05 PM EDT

[#3]

Error establishing a database connection

View Quote

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:19:09 PM EDT

[#4]

AHHHHHHHHHHH... Real Monsters.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:20:06 PM EDT

[#5]

Hillary's got this all wrapped up now.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:20:46 PM EDT

[#6]

What the fuck?!?

In on 1.

ETA: Original linky no worky.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:21:07 PM EDT

[#7]

Onion.....

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:21:12 PM EDT

[#8]

I love living a free, Constitutional Republic that is ruled by the whims of 5 people in black robes.

God Bless America

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:22:15 PM EDT

[#9]

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:22:58 PM EDT

[#10]

BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS

The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”

eta:

Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:23:08 PM EDT

[#11]

Quote History

Quoted:
cant see shit

View Quote

Sounds like an ADA complaint

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:23:47 PM EDT

[#12]

Dupe:

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1763391_Supreme_Court___Final_nail_in_America_s_coffin_.html

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:24:05 PM EDT

[#13]

What case?

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:24:18 PM EDT

[#14]

Simple solution. The states run their state and local elections in accordance with state law and on state property, but when it comes to electing federal officials hand the keys over to the feds and let them hold their elections on federal property. That will solve the solution pretty quickly unless I'm missing something here.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:29:55 PM EDT

[#15]

Quote History

Quoted:

BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS

The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”

eta:

Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.

View Quote

How often are elections of any consequence held where a federal office isn't on the ballot? They can deny illegal aliens the right to vote on bond proposals or local referendums but they can't require proof of citizenship when voting for Congress or the President?

Why am I not comforted by this?

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:33:57 PM EDT

[#16]

Quote History

Quoted:

Dupe:

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1763391_Supreme_Court___Final_nail_in_America_s_coffin_.html

View Quote

If the thread title is so poorly worded as this one, its not a dupe. You little dupe police need to show some intelligence.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:37:42 PM EDT

[#17]

Quote History

Quoted:
BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS

The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”

eta:
Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.

View Quote

Still means they don't have to provide proof before registering. Illegals can still vote for president with this decision.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:39:46 PM EDT

[#18]

Holy fuck...

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:41:24 PM EDT

[#19]

What it means is that state law can't be used to change the federal forms.

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:41:56 PM EDT

[#20]

Nevermind

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:46:40 PM EDT

[#21]

Posted: 6/29/2015 5:47:13 PM EDT

[#22]

Error establishing a database connection

View Quote

Posted: 6/29/2015 6:01:04 PM EDT

[#23]

Fucked we be....

Posted: 6/29/2015 6:02:22 PM EDT

[#24]

Quote History

Quoted:
BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS

The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”

eta:
Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.

View Quote

They are also waiting on a ruing from the 11th circuit before they see the case. There was no Circuit Split ruling so there was no reason to hear the case. Be paitent. It will go before SCOTUS, just not right now.