User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 1:53:34 AM EDT
[#1]
Frosh is obviously a lying ignorant cunt.
Txl |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 2:00:58 AM EDT
[#2]
I get so tired of seeing these drag on forever.
SCOTUS needs to step up & rule that it is a guaranteed right that cannot be infringed in any way just like it is written. Make it settled law that any bans on firearms, ammo, magazines, or permit restrictions are unconstitutional so that the courts time & billions of taxpayer dollars are no longer wasted on this nonsense. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 2:25:39 AM EDT
[#3]
"I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' Reminds me of Charles Schumer, 13 years before the DC v. Heller decision: "Like flat earth fanatics, Second Amendment fanatics just don't get it. Facts are facts. The earth is not flat. And Constitutional law is Constitutional law. The Second Amendment is not absolute. It does not guarantee the mythical individual right to bear arms we will hear argued for today. The gun lobby and its friends in Congress can line up professors of history and law from here to NRA headquarters and back. They can all swear what they think the Second Amendment means, and how many angels can dance on a pinhead. But the settled law is flatly against them." |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 2:39:37 AM EDT
[#4]
Lol
The framers could have never imagined the Internet either, yet here we are... Actually, I'm sure they had a pretty good idea that firearms technology was evolving. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 2:40:53 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Reminds me of Charles Schumer, 13 years before the DC v. Heller decision: Quote HistoryQuoted: "I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' Reminds me of Charles Schumer, 13 years before the DC v. Heller decision: "Like flat earth fanatics, Second Amendment fanatics just don't get it. Facts are facts. The earth is not flat. And Constitutional law is Constitutional law. The Second Amendment is not absolute. It does not guarantee the mythical individual right to bear arms we will hear argued for today. The gun lobby and its friends in Congress can line up professors of history and law from here to NRA headquarters and back. They can all swear what they think the Second Amendment means, and how many angels can dance on a pinhead. But the settled law is flatly against them." that actually makes me a little sick to my stomach reading that...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 7:37:48 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I get so tired of seeing these drag on forever. SCOTUS needs to step up & rule that it is a guaranteed right that cannot be infringed in any way just like it is written. Make it settled law that any bans on firearms, ammo, magazines, or permit restrictions are unconstitutional so that the courts time & billions of taxpayer dollars are no longer wasted on this nonsense. The sad reality is that SCOTUS has shown no willingness to take on the 2A issue again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 7:44:37 AM EDT
[#7]
In MD good luck. You'd have better luck teaching them to drive.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 7:45:16 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I get so tired of seeing these drag on forever. SCOTUS needs to step up & rule that it is a guaranteed right that cannot be infringed in any way just like it is written. Make it settled law that any bans on firearms, ammo, magazines, or permit restrictions are unconstitutional so that the courts time & billions of taxpayer dollars are no longer wasted on this nonsense. I bet that alone could resuscitate our economy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 7:47:13 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The sad reality is that SCOTUS has shown no willingness to take on the 2A issue again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I get so tired of seeing these drag on forever. SCOTUS needs to step up & rule that it is a guaranteed right that cannot be infringed in any way just like it is written. Make it settled law that any bans on firearms, ammo, magazines, or permit restrictions are unconstitutional so that the courts time & billions of taxpayer dollars are no longer wasted on this nonsense. The sad reality is that SCOTUS has shown no willingness to take on the 2A issue again. Help Us, Justice Roberts, You’re Our Only Hope.... Really? Careful what you wish for. 
Quoted:
In MD good luck. You'd have better luck teaching them to drive. LOL.... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:03:32 AM EDT
[#10]
Mean while in the great state of MD I can still buy a stripped lower, ...........cray
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:28:35 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Mean while in the great state of MD I can still buy a stripped lower, ...........cray What can you do with it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:32:05 AM EDT
[#12]
I think that as a general rule any law of any kind that has such a specific and arbitrary list is probably a steaming pile of shit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:38:08 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I get so tired of seeing these drag on forever. SCOTUS needs to step up & rule that it is a guaranteed right that cannot be infringed in any way just like it is written. Make it settled law that any bans on firearms, ammo, magazines, or permit restrictions are unconstitutional so that the courts time & billions of taxpayer dollars are no longer wasted on this nonsense. Please remember that Roberts is compromised....... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:38:44 AM EDT
[#14]
This is the weasel dick douche nozzle that we are dealing with.. blocked pro guns bills from being heard, tyrannically pushed SB281 through, voted against mandatory minimum sentences for sex offenders (Jessica's Law). Now the new MD AG.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:41:08 AM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
from: http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Appeals-Court-to-Hear-Arguments-on-Maryland-Gun-Control-Law-289185621.html A federal appeals court has set oral arguments over the constitutionality of a Maryland law banning 45 assault weapons and gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia scheduled arguments in the matter for March 24. In court papers filed Friday, gun-rights advocates say the law violates the Second Amendment and that a federal judge in Baltimore erred when she upheld the law last summer. Brian Frosh, Maryland's newly sworn-in attorney general and chief sponsor of the law while a state senator, said Monday that the law passes constitutional muster to protect public safety. "I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' The law bans 45 assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Maryland lawmakers approved the sweeping legislation in 2013 in response to the December 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The shooting left 20 children and six educators dead, and became a rallying point for gun-control efforts. (more at above link) Where again in the Constitution does it say anything about public safety? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:45:26 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Frosh is obviously a lying ignorant cunt. Txl |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 8:54:19 AM EDT
[#17]
I encourage everyone who lives in MD to leave, and try not to do business with firms located there. Cut off the statists' source of "revenue," taxes.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:12:08 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What can you do with it? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Mean while in the great state of MD I can still buy a stripped lower, ...........cray What can you do with it? AR pistol or HBAR. AR standard profile barrel = baby killer HBAR = not baby killer 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:27:56 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: AR pistol or HBAR. AR standard profile barrel = baby killer HBAR = not baby killer Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Mean while in the great state of MD I can still buy a stripped lower, ...........cray What can you do with it? AR pistol or HBAR. AR standard profile barrel = baby killer HBAR = not baby killer It's fo the chillren!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:29:59 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Frosh is obviously a lying ignorant cunt. Txl |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:33:45 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I encourage everyone who lives in MD to leave, and try not to do business with firms located there. Cut off the statists' source of "revenue," taxes. Well, the source of the liberal power base income is the federal gov. Chop off PG and Montgomery county and MD likely goes solid R |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:35:03 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I get so tired of seeing these drag on forever. SCOTUS needs to step up & rule that it is a guaranteed right that cannot be infringed in any way just like it is written. Make it settled law that any bans on firearms, ammo, magazines, or permit restrictions are unconstitutional so that the courts time & billions of taxpayer dollars are no longer wasted on this nonsense. They haven't had the opportunity to hear such a case yet. It will happen though. Give it time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:37:09 AM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
"I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' Then take them away from EVERY SINGLE government agent in Maryland, too. Surely they don't need them, either. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:38:02 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where again in the Constitution does it say anything about public safety? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
from: http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Appeals-Court-to-Hear-Arguments-on-Maryland-Gun-Control-Law-289185621.html A federal appeals court has set oral arguments over the constitutionality of a Maryland law banning 45 assault weapons and gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia scheduled arguments in the matter for March 24. In court papers filed Friday, gun-rights advocates say the law violates the Second Amendment and that a federal judge in Baltimore erred when she upheld the law last summer. Brian Frosh, Maryland's newly sworn-in attorney general and chief sponsor of the law while a state senator, said Monday that the law passes constitutional muster to protect public safety. "I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' The law bans 45 assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Maryland lawmakers approved the sweeping legislation in 2013 in response to the December 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The shooting left 20 children and six educators dead, and became a rallying point for gun-control efforts. (more at above link) Where again in the Constitution does it say anything about public safety? Well both intermediate and strict scrutiny review include a review of a state's reasons for infringing a right -- public safety being one such reason or "need" or motivating factor. The constitution doesn't mention it but neither does it mention judicial review. They are both part of our common law as it has evolved over centuries of jurisprudence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:38:56 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, the source of the liberal power base income is the federal gov. Chop off PG and Montgomery county and MD likely goes solid R Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I encourage everyone who lives in MD to leave, and try not to do business with firms located there. Cut off the statists' source of "revenue," taxes. Well, the source of the liberal power base income is the federal gov. Chop off PG and Montgomery county and MD likely goes solid R We need to create a new state called "Hellhole", where we combine those two counties in MD with Fairfax, Arlington, and Alexandria in VA. It would solve so many problems. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:55:09 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: AR pistol or HBAR. AR standard profile barrel = baby killer HBAR = not baby killer Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Mean while in the great state of MD I can still buy a stripped lower, ...........cray What can you do with it? AR pistol or HBAR. AR standard profile barrel = baby killer HBAR = not baby killer  |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 9:58:06 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I encourage everyone who lives in MD to leave, and try not to do business with firms located there. Cut off the statists' source of "revenue," taxes. I did, 3 years ago and will never look back!! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:01:13 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well both intermediate and strict scrutiny review include a review of a state's reasons for infringing a right -- public safety being one such reason or "need" or motivating factor. The constitution doesn't mention it but neither does it mention judicial review. They are both part of our common law as it has evolved over centuries of jurisprudence. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: SNIP Where again in the Constitution does it say anything about public safety? Well both intermediate and strict scrutiny review include a review of a state's reasons for infringing a right -- public safety being one such reason or "need" or motivating factor. The constitution doesn't mention it but neither does it mention judicial review. They are both part of our common law as it has evolved over centuries of jurisprudence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:05:48 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
from: http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Appeals-Court-to-Hear-Arguments-on-Maryland-Gun-Control-Law-289185621.html A federal appeals court has set oral arguments over the constitutionality of a Maryland law banning 45 assault weapons and gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia scheduled arguments in the matter for March 24. In court papers filed Friday, gun-rights advocates say the law violates the Second Amendment and that a federal judge in Baltimore erred when she upheld the law last summer. Brian Frosh, Maryland's newly sworn-in attorney general and chief sponsor of the law while a state senator, said Monday that the law passes constitutional muster to protect public safety. "I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' The law bans 45 assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Maryland lawmakers approved the sweeping legislation in 2013 in response to the December 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The shooting left 20 children and six educators dead, and became a rallying point for gun-control efforts. (more at above link) I swear, whenever a politician from EITHER side of the aisle says "common sense", I immediately discount whatever they are saying and hear "My opinion counts more than yours so I'm going to violate the law in order to force my agenda down your throat." Do they teach politicians to say that when they go to politician training? It's like the first rule they learn. "If you want to spout bullshit, just call it common sense, whether it is or not." Retards. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:07:48 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think that as a general rule any law of any kind that has such a specific and arbitrary list is probably a steaming pile of shit. Agreed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:14:05 AM EDT
[#31]
Too bad the 4th has such a bad record in terms of gun rights. Out of 15 judges that sit on the court 9 of them were appointed by democrat presidents including a chief justice appointed by clinton, and seven of them were appointed by Obama.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:18:17 AM EDT
[#32]
Unfortunately, the Fourth Circuit has been all progged up to the point that it rivals the Nutty Ninth. If you were able to reassemble the Fourth of forty years ago, this would be a tap-in win. Now, it's a waste of time, except as a necessary step to get a chance to file a writ.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:21:02 AM EDT
[#33]
I and most of my friends, 50 years ago, would have lost a bet if someone insisted this country would become so fucked up in the future.
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:25:44 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Frosh is obviously a lying ignorant cunt. Txl Having testified before Frosh when he was the Judiciary chairman that unilaterally killed any attempt at shall-issue in MD, FPNI. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:32:09 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I and most of my friends, 50 years ago, would have lost a bet if someone insisted this country would become so fucked up in the future. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 11:32:42 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Reminds me of Charles Schumer, 13 years before the DC v. Heller decision: Quote HistoryQuoted: "I think this is a common-sense test,'' Frosh told The Daily Record. "The Second Amendment does not protect assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines. It's certainly not what the framers of the Constitution intended when they drafted the Second Amendment.'' Reminds me of Charles Schumer, 13 years before the DC v. Heller decision: "Like flat earth fanatics, Second Amendment fanatics just don't get it. Facts are facts. The earth is not flat. And Constitutional law is Constitutional law. The Second Amendment is not absolute. It does not guarantee the mythical individual right to bear arms we will hear argued for today. The gun lobby and its friends in Congress can line up professors of history and law from here to NRA headquarters and back. They can all swear what they think the Second Amendment means, and how many angels can dance on a pinhead. But the settled law is flatly against them." |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 11:42:46 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Frosh is obviously a lying ignorant cunt. Txl Indeed. FBF |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
