User Panel
Posted: 1/4/2003 6:42:24 PM EDT
My understanding is that the Search feature is now only available to paying members of AR15.com. While I can appreciate that this feature can affect the server resources and I/O parameters and is therefore more "expensive," I can understand why AR15.com would rather make this a "pay to play" feature.
HOWEVER, don't you think this is a bit self-destructive? My reasoning is that there is a ton of information on this site that is being logged and saved in archives. BUT, if most of the newcomers and others who browse this site don't see a topic related to their questions...they are going to ask THE SAME questions that get asked every week. There have been tons of topics on that phenomenon too! You know what I'm talking about, questions like: *Is Rock River Arms a good brand? *Can I buy a collapsible stock for my new AR? *What about Tasco scopes? *Is the Remington 700 VSS the same as the 700 PSS? *Is $15 a good price for new 30-round mags? *Building my first AR, which brand? *What is difference between 5.56mm and .223? Therefore, I would think that if anything...the MY TOPICS features would be a "pay to play" feature before the SEARCH feature. If the same questions that have been answered 20 times in the last 3 months are not easily accessible via SEARCH for newcomers and old alike, then more space and bandwidth will be eaten up by dejavu inquiries. If money is the main issue, I would think that the popularity of this site would and could justify an increase in advertising costs for banner space, etc. Especially since many vendors chime in and/or sell their wares through the discussion boards. I am not complaining, but just pointing something out. This is coming from a long-time non-paying member. I know...I guess I should just scrape up some cash and quietly send it in. [i]Edited topic... Wanted to make this the discussion thread for the topic at hand. -- GB[/i] |
|
Did you know this topic was posted yesterday? You should have used th-
oh, wait, never mind [BD] |
|
Well a lot of memberships have been purchased recently because of the loss of the search feature for non paying members. It would be completely unfair to them to reinstate it since it was the reason they laid out their money to begin with.
Now I can understand why a first time visitor might not want to plunk down $20 to get that ability... but for those who have been here for awhile, if you want to search than [b] pay the less than 6 cents a day to be a team member. [/b] |
|
I really wouldn't care if they gave the search back for free. I paid so I could have
this fly picture by my name. [}:D] |
|
Aug is right, a complete and thorough FAQ would alleviate the need for many multiple posts and a search feature to answer basic questions.
I [b] WOULD [/b] mind if search is given back for free. That's all I have to say about that. |
|
OK, I'm going to make this as simple as I can and I don't really know Juan or anyone else 'cept through a couple of very concise IM's.
[red]Here's the headline in several months:[/red] [i]AR15.com going the way of the Firing Line, the dodo bird, and a full auto M16 for $2000....[/i] Due to no member support, the site is now being dismantled, large bills piling up with no end in sight, and a failing credit rating Juan Avila needs to close up shop and sell off all the hardware used to support the operation of the site. This will still leave him in debt and is a rather unfortunate outcome to what started out as a "good idea". [b]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[/b] Or we can boil it down the common bitch ass way: "Oh, so now you have to pay to use the search function?"[?] How weak....[rolleyes] [b]Think of it as a donation/gift/investment in/to Juan Avila your humble and hard working webmaster. Or continue to think of it your way and become the butt of many jokes to come -- whether voiced here or offline.[/b] [blue][size=4][b]Oh, one more thing -- as an added benefit of your philanthrophy you get the search function back! [;)][/blue][/size=4][/b] Thanks, Ed |
|
We got those repeated threads even WITH the search feature. We would get them with a FAQ, no matter how complete it was - though I do think a well organized FAQ is a good idea.
My Topics is also a good idea - at least if a member starts a thread he can find it again easily. |
|
Quoted: I [b] WOULD [/b] mind if search is given back for free. That's all I have to say about that. View Quote If only. |
|
I understand the deal and AM greatful!
If it is getting that bad, why not make this a pay only site? 30-60 days free "try out" then pay or canceled. $20 is not that big a deal. Most folks pay more than that for a 30 day porn site membership. |
|
[img]http://photos.ar15.com/WS_Content/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=3659[/img]
Pay up or shut up![:D] |
|
Look, they came up with a very reasonable alternative to those members who did't want or need to pay for email service or photo gallerys. I decided it was time to fish or cut bait.
|
|
we all know the noobs never used the search anyway. Thus the reposting of all those topics. I am sure GB would have loved to have kept everything free. The fact is this site costs money to run. he never required anyone to pay. he is offering more functionality for helping the site.
I fully understand not wanting to pay. Heck it goes against everything the net is based on. But you have to decide if you want to help support a place you spend a lot of time on. I mean i piss away far more than 20.00 a year on crap i don't need. considering how slow the sight is at peak times i don't think it's much to ask for. To be honest i am surprised it has lasted this long for free. Most similar sites that are not commercially funded die within a year. mike |
|
Quoted: I still think a FAQ would be a good idea. View Quote There are ones for ammo and magazines. Helps a little anyway..... Scott |
|
I agree with tailgate about the search function being for paid members only causing more threads on this site.
|
|
Maybe an idea that can be explored down the road is allowing a certain number of posts with full site functionality before you are forced to pay... of course I'm guessing that number would be far below 3,000 or even 1,200 for that matter.
|
|
Quoted: I am not complaining, but just pointing something out. This is coming from a long-time non-paying member. I know...I guess I should just scrape up some cash and quietly send it in. View Quote If you'll notice, I DID SAY that I AM NOT complaining and understand I should just pay. However, the responses to my post belittle and even insult (as in ilikelegs "SHUT THE F#@* UP post). This is one of the reasons I have been reluctant to pay, as I have noticed the moderators being quite liberal in how some people treat other people on this board. If flaming and belittling people make you feel better, then do it elsewhere. But it is attitudes and sentiments like this that give the media and populace the prejudice against gunowners as being uneducated, adolescent, redneck, coon-ass jerks who are impulsive and have no self-control. I've been a contributing member here for quite some time, and do not try to flame or insult anyone. I also try to READ their post before responding. The last thing I want to see is this site go down due to funding. Then again, if the popularity is so high, there is a HUGE argument for increasing the advertising fees and structures. It's what Marketing is all about. People pay proportionate to the exposure. It was only a suggestion, but I guess I have to keep those to myself since I am not a paying member. |
|
Quoted: I really wouldn't care if they gave the search back for free. I paid so I could have this fly picture by my name. [}:D] View Quote and a [b]FLY[/b] picture it is!! [:D] |
|
Quoted: Then again, if the popularity is so high, there is a HUGE argument for increasing the advertising fees and structures. View Quote That is what I don't get. If this site is so popular and has so many regular visitors then why doesn't advertizing pay for it ? |
|
Tailgate the answer is not to increase the advertising rates. That argument might fly with broadcast television in whicj Neilson ratings and market share determine what can be charged. For the broadcasters, the airwaves are free. Yes they need to pay other overhead, but use of the airwaves costs them nothing.
GB on the other hand has to pay for his bandwidth, servers, maintenance, software... In theory we could put that whole burden on the advertisers, but I'm guessing you'd lose quite a few of them. For example, I got the gunshop I work with to advertise here. They are supporting the site to the tune of $1,200 a year plus donations to the site such as commissions per gun sold through the site, raffle give aways for Bike4Tykes, etc. Just how much money do you think a lot of the advertisers here have to blow? By and large they are small operations. Think of it like TV. You get the major netowrks for free. If you want cable you pay for that. You want premium channels you pay even more. Nothing in life is free, somebody has to pay. If you are not willing to pay than you need to accept the fact that there might be a few services withheld, but for the most part the site functions for you just as it functions for me. The difference is I've paid for some extra services. There needed to be a compromise, and this one is fair. You can still use the site as much as you want, no limit on posts, no limit on how much time you can spend here... Anyway, if you really step back and look at it I think you'll see its really an equitable answer to a very real problem... balancing services and funds available. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I really wouldn't care if they gave the search back for free. I paid so I could have this fly picture by my name. [}:D] View Quote and a [b]FLY[/b] picture it is!! [:D] View Quote [}:D] Cyric, Greater Power of Pandemonium! |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I am not complaining, but just pointing something out. This is coming from a long-time non-paying member. I know...I guess I should just scrape up some cash and quietly send it in. View Quote If you'll notice, I DID SAY that I AM NOT complaining and understand I should just pay. However, the responses to my post belittle and even insult (as in ilikelegs "SHUT THE F#@* UP post). This is one of the reasons I have been reluctant to pay, as I have noticed the moderators being quite liberal in how some people treat other people on this board. If flaming and belittling people make you feel better, then do it elsewhere. But it is attitudes and sentiments like this that give the media and populace the prejudice against gunowners as being uneducated, adolescent, redneck, coon-ass jerks who are impulsive and have no self-control. I've been a contributing member here for quite some time, and do not try to flame or insult anyone. I also try to READ their post before responding. The last thing I want to see is this site go down due to funding. Then again, if the popularity is so high, there is a HUGE argument for increasing the advertising fees and structures. It's what Marketing is all about. People pay proportionate to the exposure. It was only a suggestion, but I guess I have to keep those to myself since I am not a paying member. View Quote ilikelegs isn't happy unless he is photoshopping these days. He did include a smiley on his post... We all know a thick skin is sometimes required around here [:)] I didn't think I was belittling or insulting. I voiced similar concerns before this came about, though my concerns were geared more toward attracting new members - paying or not. I think all members here are important to the continuing growth of this site. The 30 day search function for new members is a good idea. I don't know how we could keep people from simply registering a new user name though so it might be imposssible to implement. |
|
Quoted: There needed to be a compromise, and this one is fair. View Quote I would agree. I choked at $60, I couldn't afford that expence right now, but $20, that is very fair for basic service. |
|
Could someone tell me if Rock River Arms makes a good barrel?
|
|
Tailgate,
I'm not going to belittle you with this post since it would be pretty hypocritical of me to do so. Technically, I'm not a paying member either, since a very generous Team Member was kind enough to sponsor my membership. The way I understand it, certain features were taking up a large percentage of the site resources, and the decision was made to reserve those features for those who chose to become paying members (at least for the present time). I think the FAQs suggested in this thread are a good idea. Maybe folks with some extra space on their webservers could even donate that space to host a few FAQs for this site. That should help take some of the load off of the site. I agree that fighting among ourselves is counterproductive. I suppose it's time for us to try to solve some of our own problems rather than creating more of them. Any ideas, Tailgate? (And yes, I'm being serious, not facetious) |
|
Here's my take:
1) Pay-for-search came up before. 2) Shortly thereafter, Goatboy brought free search back... 3) Now, the free search is gone again... Personally, I think that free search is a must-have in some areas. The Equipment Exchange, for one... It's the only feasable way to sift through ads. I can think of a few times during the last 'search outage' where I might have bought from an EE seller instead of (AIM Surplus, GunBroker, EBay, etc...) if I could have found one... Ditto for the tech forums... It might make more sense to remove search in (and through) CERTAIN FORUMS (General Discussion, etc) where it is less critical, or dumb it down a bit (i.e. no search by poster, just 'in title', 'in topic', or 'in responses')... Since alot of what goes on in GD is entertaining but of little reference use, search there is less important than areas that are more of a 'living tech manual'... From experience with this site and a few others, people will value the tech info, and it's what will bring them here (weather it's 'Why is my AR jamming' (here) or 'Why is my car loosing power' (thirdgen.org), etc), these are the things that bring people in... |
|
Quoted: Could someone tell me if Rock River Arms makes a good barrel? View Quote Rock River Arms, Inc. Tel: 309-792-5780 Fax: 309-792-5781 They should know, but they may be biased... [:D] |
|
There is an old addage which comes to mind... I think it applies here.
In life you get what you pay for... With this site, for those that aren't Team members, you are getting far [b] MORE [/b] than you pay for! If you have a free moment between making a few thousand free posts maybe you could take a minute or two and write to Juan and tell him what a great site this is and how much you appreciate being able to hang out here and post for free and enjoy people's company. I know it would mean a lot to him! |
|
Quoted: Here's my take: 1) Pay-for-search came up before. 2) Shortly thereafter, Goatboy brought free search back... 3) Now, the free search is gone again... Personally, I think that free search is a must-have in some areas. The Equipment Exchange, for one... It's the only feasable way to sift through ads. I can think of a few times during the last 'search outage' where I might have bought from an EE seller instead of (AIM Surplus, GunBroker, EBay, etc...) if I could have found one... Ditto for the tech forums... It might make more sense to remove search in (and through) CERTAIN FORUMS (General Discussion, etc) where it is less critical, or dumb it down a bit (i.e. no search by poster, just 'in title', 'in topic', or 'in responses')... Since alot of what goes on in GD is entertaining but of little reference use, search there is less important than areas that are more of a 'living tech manual'... From experience with this site and a few others, people will value the tech info, and it's what will bring them here (weather it's 'Why is my AR jamming' (here) or 'Why is my car loosing power' (thirdgen.org), etc), these are the things that bring people in... View Quote You are correct. Search will be reinstated in the Equipment Exchange. The thing is, Goatboy writes the code for every inch of this site so changes take time. Reinstating it for the troubleshooting forum may be a good idea too, but that is his call. |
|
Oh, boy, I cant wait for the pop up ads to start playing on the site.
Money, Money, Money....[banghead] I have an idea. If the money is what it is all about, lets see the costs of running the site, versus what income is recieved from the advertisers and membership dues etc. I would be interested in seeing that, as would many other people on this site. [BS2] |
|
lets see the costs of running the site, versus what income is recieved from the advertisers and membership dues etc Yes post this information I was here when the teammember idea was first brought up Id also like to see the # of current teammembers because I remember the numbers being trown around when this was developed. Im not bitching about the Idea just courious about the sites progress towards being self supportive |
|
Quoted: Oh, boy, I cant wait for the pop up ads to start playing on the site. Money, Money, Money....[banghead] I have an idea. If the money is what it is all about, lets see the costs of running the site, versus what income is recieved from the advertisers and membership dues etc. I would be interested in seeing that, as would many other people on this site. [BS2] View Quote Maybe the owners of this [b]private[/b] site will see fit to release this [b]private[/b] information. Of course, it would be helpful, and a good example for [b]you[/b] to release [b]your[/b] private financial info also, so that we can assess [b]your[/b] financial decisions as well. |
|
The financial info associated with this site isn't anyone’s business. Do you think a free membership or a minimum investment of 6 cents a day for a bronze level membership makes you a stockholder or something?
GB and his family have made a large investment in time and money in this site and they deserve a return on their investment. Anything he can do to turn a profit on this site should be done. When did capitalism become a dirty word? |
|
I know nothing on how much it cost to run this site, but I'm pretty sure there are probably at least 3-4 T1's for bandwidth.
You can probably get 4 T1's for about $2,000 a month. Then there is the cost of all the servers, harddrives, memory etc. The hardware would need upgrading ocassionally. Plus the replacement of dead hardware. The programing of the software etc. But wait, doesn't Goatboy do it himself? Thats $0.00 right? Yup, I charge 0 an hour for my time too. [rolleyes] This is just a guess, but I'd say anywhere from 3,000 to 5,000 a month. And I'm probably way off. |
|
try www.thefiringline.com
the search function is still available there. Now, that is my first choice if I wanted to do some homework. |
|
ASA and Hesse are going to sell more rifles as a result of the lost search feature. Hmmm....is there some kind of conspiracy?
|
|
Quoted: There is an old addage which comes to mind... I think it applies here. In life you get what you pay for... With this site, for those that aren't Team members, you are getting far [b] MORE [/b] than you pay for![red] If you have a free moment between making a few thousand free posts [/red] maybe you could take a minute or two and write to Juan and tell him what a great site this is and how much you appreciate being able to hang out here and post for free and enjoy people's company. I know it would mean a lot to him! View Quote |
|
what good would the financials do? GB has a full time job developing and running this place. plus trying to make a living for his family. I doubt the board will make enough to pay all the expenses plus a 60k+ per year salary for him.
I'd like to see things free as well. But i also hope juan makes a fortune off this place. |
|
first, i wasn't even aware there was a "membership" avaliable. i really enjoy this site and a $20.00 "donation" would be "my pleasure" as a token of appreciation.
second, advertising is way down on the internet. since the dot.com bust many sites have gone under whose support depended upon advertising. without membership support expect more features to go away... |
|
Quoted: I agree that fighting among ourselves is counterproductive. I suppose it's time for us to try to solve some of our own problems rather than creating more of them. Any ideas, Tailgate? (And yes, I'm being serious, not facetious) View Quote Yes, I DO have some ideas. Wanna hear them? First, I would think that it is way-past-due to cut down on the number of Forums. The General Board is more than enough for a big site...but we ALSO have AR15 Board (which General seems to cover most of the time so it seems redundant), AK, Handguns, etc. In some ways, these should be spun-off as separate sites to people who would be willing to maintain them separately (i.e. maybe some of the Moderators who spend a lot of time on AK or Handguns would want to run those as separate sites on separate servers, etc.). Cutting down on some of the Forums in the Boards would help too. RELOADING is probably covered by many, many other web sites on the 'net because many of the questions there are not even related to the AR. Secondly, I would think the IM MAIL is more resource intensive than SEARCH. Why should IM MAIL be free? Why should we have it at all? People can (and probably already have) set up a free Hotmail or similar email account and have a link to their name. Send emails instead of IM MAIL messages. Still need Instant Messaging capabilities? Then make people use the free services like AOL IM or Yahoo IM or others!!! Third: Don't you think all of the crazy pictures posted eat up resource and bandwidth? OF COURSE THEY DO! And then people hit "Quote" when they reply which sends the pic again. There should be only certain forums and certain conditions in which a picture should be posted. Fourth: Advertising Dollars. I understand that smaller shops can only afford so much. But, if this site is so huge, many other companies would be interested in advertising here...companies that AREN'T associated with firearms. Car manufacturers, Electronics companies, AOL, Earthlink, MSN, News Channels/Websites, etc. Fifth: If the Exchange Forum is so popular or resource intensive (I don't know if it is), then there are two things that could be done. First is to charge businesses a monthly fee for certain numbers of posts...you know there are a lot of guys that sell a lot of stuff every month. It's a free advertisement for them. Secondly, just start charging a small fee or percentage for sell items. Come on, with eBay, AuctionArms, Gunbroker.com, and others...people can buy and sell gun stuff no problem. IN SUMMATION... Again, $20 is a great deal, no doubt. I am just concerned that this web site has been trying to be all things to all people and has lost the intense focus that is required to stay profitable and successful. A lot of forums, boards, and features are way cool (good job Goatboy!), but aren't necessarily required to keep members/attendance numbers up. Why not get back to all things AR15 related, and leave the other topics/boards/etc. to other web sites? My humble opinion... |
|
I do not think it is wise to increase the fee for commercial advertisers. If it is to costly to advertise here, they will spend their money else-where. I know, each time I buy from a vender that has an add on this site, I note it on the order, so they know that their advertising dollars were bringing in business.
I feel the free membership gives the first time user a taste of the site. There should be a pop-up at so many posts (say every tenth post a free member makes), that explains the costs and benefits that each member package level provides. This will remind the free member that for a modest fee, the site will be more useful to them. When I use the spell-check, it doesn't work.........just says "LOADING". It might be just my machine??? I am going to get flamed for this, but I feel the premium membership level should be worth $10 per month ($120). OSA |
|
Tailgate,
I wasn't going to post to this. But your last post kind of made me mad. So,here goes, I've never seen any man whine as much as you have about this whole thing. I mean who cares as long as everyone that comes here has a great time. I wouldn't even be here or a Mod in the Womenz Forum if it weren't for a few friends and my hubby who has been a member here for a while. $20.00's isn't much to ask for. I mean you'd pay more on a Porn Site and look at what all you get. Friendships,Valuable Information for whatever type of gun you shoot. I mean come on now. I think that this thread is a waste of time and a new better topic be started. Like,How Can We Help Goatboy Keep The Site Up. You must not like this place as much as some. Or you'd be really supportive on whatever decisions Goatboy makes. Pay the $20.00's and get off of your soapbox. And another thing,when I send an IM Message through AR15.com,my computer doesn't get hacked into like it has with AOL IM,Yahoo IM and all those others. And some poeple here don't like to give out their Email Addy's. And it's a much better way to contact someone if you need a quick answer. Rather than waiting a day or 2 for one. Okay,I said my peace! Mona p.s. a womanz point of view! |
|
BEST IDEAS YET!!!
OK, probably the #1 issue of bandwidth and resource consumption on this website is the General Discussion Forum, am I right? Here's what we can do to significantly reduce those issues: a) Since most of the threads are current events or just plain silliness (nothing wrong with that), then if a thread has no activity for 3 days...take it off. Why should there be 76 pages of threads? Probably GD is the only one that needs this done to it. b) DO NOT ARCHIVE GENERAL DISCUSSION. Again, most of it is current events or silly topics, so there is no need to archive it and/or have the SEARCH function scroll through it. Any truly important topics can be archived manually, right? c) Don't let SEARCH scroll through GD. Why? Because if you keep it to only current topics, people should be able to scroll through the pages and find what they need (heck, use your Browser's "Search" feature). d) Kill a GD thread at 4 pages. If people really are interested in that topic, let them start a continuation topic so that the old stuff can be taken off and go the way of the DoDo bird ala point "b". Second idea has to do with the disdain for pop-up advertising. I hate it too...that is what's brilliant! Allow advertisers to pay for pop-up advertising. BUT, if you are a member, you are not subjected to pop-ups (this way, free surfers have to deal with it, payers don't). Third idea has to do with cutting back the number of Boards and Forums. Create links to other web sites that can fulfill these questions...but make them pay a nominal fee for it! And, if they want a banner or to be put at the top of a links list, charge them a bit higher fee! I had some others, but need to eat and go to church. Hope these get the brain cells stimulated. |
|
Didn't know there was a basic $20 membership now , i don't look as much as i used to because i have limited access at work.
www.gunandknife.com was a great site and he closed up and locked the doors. no archives, no arguements, nothing. somebody tell me how to send my $20 in, don't want this site to close also. |
|
Quoted: When I use the spell-check, it doesn't work.........just says "LOADING". It might be just my machine??? OSA View Quote Nope, not just you. Using outlook spellcheck is faster anyway. |
|
Quoted: Didn't know there was a basic $20 membership now , i don't look as much as i used to because i have limited access at work. www.gunandknife.com was a great site and he closed up and locked the doors. no archives, no arguements, nothing. somebody tell me how to send my $20 in, don't want this site to close also. View Quote Go to the front page (click HOME), scroll down to ABOUT US, click MEMBERSHIP INFO |
|
Quoted: I do not think it is wise to increase the fee for commercial advertisers. If it is to costly to advertise here, they will spend their money else-where. I know, each time I buy from a vender that has an add on this site, I note it on the order, so they know that their advertising dollars were bringing in business. I feel the free membership gives the first time user a taste of the site. There should be a pop-up at so many posts (say every tenth post a free member makes), that explains the costs and benefits that each member package level provides. This will remind the free member that for a modest fee, the site will be more useful to them. When I use the spell-check, it doesn't work.........just says "LOADING". It might be just my machine??? I am going to get flamed for this, but I feel the premium membership level should be worth $10 per month ($120). OSA View Quote OSA, I won't flame you for that... However, while I would gladly pay another $20 if Goat asked, right now I'm focusing on buying bronze memberships for others to give people a vested interest in the site. I don't care how that extra $20 goes to Goat, but I will make sure he gets it. |
|
Like any commercial venture, if you feel your getting a fair exchange, buy the product. If not, vote with your wallet.
Very few free things last long or perform well. I'll get my search back when I send my cash or I'll live without. But it really is a pittance. No reason for me to pay until I get back to my box and reconfigure it. I have to go trough paroxysms to post (log on) at present. If anyone’s still having trouble logging on, Im betting its your firewall. Or maybe Putty but I doubt it. Anyone have anything to add re: the log on problem - Im interested. Until spring, Im searchless. Luck Alac |
|
Quoted: First, I would think that it is way-past-due to cut down on the number of Forums. The General Board is more than enough for a big site...but we ALSO have AR15 Board (which General seems to cover most of the time so it seems redundant), AK, Handguns, etc. In some ways, these should be spun-off as separate sites to people who would be willing to maintain them separately (i.e. maybe some of the Moderators who spend a lot of time on AK or Handguns would want to run those as separate sites on separate servers, etc.). Cutting down on some of the Forums in the Boards would help too. RELOADING is probably covered by many, many other web sites on the 'net because many of the questions there are not even related to the AR. View Quote Cutting the number of forums doesn't do jack squat for BW usage. (Guys, this isn't top secret information, people here with experience know how the net works and can offer quality solutions and ideas. These are one's I have considered as well.) What eats up BW is the amount of traffic and specifically the amount of information sent to users. Every page you read generates about 50k of transfers. Now multiply that over an average of 800 users many with multiple windows opening a page ever 5 seconds and the number grows significantly. The more BW we throw at the site (two years ago it ran on a SINGLE T1!!!) the more people become regulars and the higher our user count is. We went from averaging 250 to about 750 now. We've peaked at over 1800 users a number of times. It's easy to also ask for new sites to go up, but then those people would be responsible for upkeep, admin, and covering expenses. Not to mention software, hardware, etc. It's not bad when you start out and have a hundred or two on at once, that's relatively easy to manage. Try 1000 and see what happens. [;)] What helps us now is having the diversity. This also is going to play a big part in our future as sites continue to close. We're also able to seek advertising and support from not just AR businesses, but from others. (Expect to see more of that this year!) Secondly, I would think the IM MAIL is more resource intensive than SEARCH. Why should IM MAIL be free? Why should we have it at all? People can (and probably already have) set up a free Hotmail or similar email account and have a link to their name. Send emails instead of IM MAIL messages. Still need Instant Messaging capabilities? Then make people use the free services like AOL IM or Yahoo IM or others!!! View Quote Yeah this would cut back on some of the DB resource use, but that's why each user is limited in how many messages they can have before their IM is full. (Reminds me I need to code a better meter!) I think this is one of those features which is essential for guys to communicate quickly. I'm all for removing this if it's desired! [=)] Third: Don't you think all of the crazy pictures posted eat up resource and bandwidth? OF COURSE THEY DO! And then people hit "Quote" when they reply which sends the pic again. There should be only certain forums and certain conditions in which a picture should be posted. View Quote Actually you're wrong here. Only pictures hosted by the site waste BW. The ones on other sites or services eat up THEIR BW. This is why places that offer photo sharing and free websites do not let you link pictures offsite. As for the "quote" issue, that was fixed long ago. Pictures that are quoted are turned into URLs. [=D] Fourth: Advertising Dollars. I understand that smaller shops can only afford so much. But, if this site is so huge, many other companies would be interested in advertising here...companies that AREN'T associated with firearms. Car manufacturers, Electronics companies, AOL, Earthlink, MSN, News Channels/Websites, etc. View Quote Working on that! [=)] The problem is, as someone mentioned, many companies are moving AWAY from online advertising right now as money is tight. Last year we lost a hefty chunk of it and felt the burden of the site. It's an up and down market where you never know what to expect. It's a lot easier to deal with when you're not a startup, business, or concerned with milking advertisers. Fifth: If the Exchange Forum is so popular or resource intensive (I don't know if it is), then there are two things that could be done. First is to charge businesses a monthly fee for certain numbers of posts...you know there are a lot of guys that sell a lot of stuff every month. It's a free advertisement for them. Secondly, just start charging a small fee or percentage for sell items. Come on, with eBay, AuctionArms, Gunbroker.com, and others...people can buy and sell gun stuff no problem. View Quote We already charge DEALER accounts for businesses/individuals who sell often. We're also working on replacing the forum with an engine and charging a small per/listing fee. IN SUMMATION... Again, $20 is a great deal, no doubt. I am just concerned that this web site has been trying to be all things to all people and has lost the intense focus that is required to stay profitable and successful. A lot of forums, boards, and features are way cool (good job Goatboy!), but aren't necessarily required to keep members/attendance numbers up. Why not get back to all things AR15 related, and leave the other topics/boards/etc. to other web sites? My humble opinion... View Quote I hope I helped answer the questions you posed about fixes and tweaks. If you noticed, last night I updated the site to allow all the images (and subsequent BW) to be moved elsewhere. I expect to have at least one or two members helping to host that and share the BW. I have been focused, for over a year, on cutting back on BW use and keeping resource use as tight as possible as well. The best thing I can do now is REBUILD the site in a newer technology which will accomplish the resource management better. That's just life... but finding the time isn't so easy! [=)] The final solution in keeping our costs down is either to make the site PAY ONLY, which I swore I would not do, or go back to limiting the number of users allowed at once which seems to just piss people off. |
|
Scattered responses:
I will revert back to the old autologin if that's what it takes to fix it. If you haven't already tried clearing out your cookies, please do that now. [=)] We're moving away from the current spellcheck service. I grow tired of monthly bills piling up. I talked with a company who has a product I will help code and be free to use. (Partnerships like that help keep costs down, just makes me more busy... [=(]) This should help with problems people are seeing with spellcheck. We've shared what the site runs on, how many lines locally, how many lines at the secondary location, software costs, etc. It hasn't been a secret. I don't mind the question, but do you mind if I ask you to post your salary, how often you spend time here, and what you do with your free time? Again, you shouldn't be offended, but it's not really my business to know every minor detail on how you live your life. In running this site I also try to help businesses that are starting out, guys who are small AND big. I try to handle the giant balancing act you guys take for granted. Every bit of this, development, admin, etc. takes a toll on my free time and personal life. No search sucks, I know this, I don't want you guys to miss it, but right now I have to do what needs to be done. If you think about it, $20/year is $1.67 a month. You can find that much on the street, in your car, of in beer bottle exchanges! (Get your carts ready! [;)]) Take a little ownership in something you enjoy and take some of the burden off my back. If not, that's fine too, but don't rip into me because of it. I'm doing the best I can FOR YOU. [=)] |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.