Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh - and you can't use a .50 against people per the geneva convention... but you can shoot at the LBE, dog tags, canteen, belt buckle, ball point pen in the pocket, etc... You can use then .50 on equipment.
View Quote
Gack: You're wrong. Please don't spread "facts" you obviously are not qualified to talk about.
View Quote
That's probably what his DS told him. My DS told the company the same thing.
View Quote
I don't doubt that. My drill sergeant told us the same thing - and also the story about the depressed trainee who tried to kill himself by wrapping the buffer cord around his neck and throwing the buffer out the window (of course, as the story goes, the buffer cord was longer than the drop and the - still live and well - kid had to pay for a new buffer). He told us several ther gems as well.
I still wouldn't go around spreading those stories unless I'd seen an actual news article or similar hard evidence from the time.
When dealing with Law of Warfare training, this is particularly ridiculous because:
A) The complete contents of restrictions is open source information, and
B) During LOW training we in the military go OUT OF OUR WAY to keep mentioning this BS every class and make sure it is disspelled.
I guess the .50 cal story isn't as bad as the one that claims you can't shoot a paratrooper until he has hit the ground. That load of BS can get someone killed!
Simply put:
Regarding .50 cal machineguns: Their [i]doctrinal[/i] role is anti-materiel. There are simply much more suitable weapons for engaging dismounted troops. Any true stories involving orders against such use were more to do with conservation of ammo and efficient use of available weapons systems than international law.
Regarding paratroopers: It is against internationally accepted rules of engagement to target noncombatants. These include chaplains and parachutists fleeing a doomed plane. Until these folks pull a weapon, they are not considered a threat. An armed combatant jumping from an aircraft for the sole reason of engaging in combat does not receive the benefit of this policy. Also, the aircraft need not have a single weapon of its own, yet if you are piloting such an aircraft, you can expect the opposing force to aim that aforementioned .50 cal machine gun right at you - and be fully justified as engaging in self defense!
Adam