Yeah its more of a Ford chevy argument when it comes down to it.
My shop in the Corps had about 130+ machines and WD and Maxtors seemed to be the worst, but that was 3+ years ago, I'm sure the quality changes with each design.
Glad cooling came up, my last home machine sounded like a 747 taking off with scsi drives, a pull fan in the front, push fan back, and video card fan, and a small fan between the drives...and a HUGE 3 fan heatsink and fan on the slot 1 celeron 300 that was overclocked to 450...When I got a 500 mhz PIII cheap from a friend, it ran the same, my gaming experience was just about the same. Negligible differnce.
Asfor 5400 vs 7200, my neighbor spends a shitload of money on a regular basis on his machines, and has tried both drives in the same machine, and noticed no difference in his loading, including his gaming experience. I felt kinda guilty cuz I'm the one that told him about the 7200s being faster.
The 2k server I was talking about was a file server/ VPN server/norton server/dns/print server/etc... Tha network is about 20 clients give or take depending on the contracts we're on at any given time...plus several regular VPN clients...Not high stress being that hardly anyone uses file server...The IBM drives in it has been perfect, as well as the 7 IBM drives in my raid array on my linux pop3 mailserver...
But back to the subject, I would spring for one of those drive fans either that mounts on the bottom the drive or the one that mounts in front. I gots em on my scsi drives at the house. To be honest I'm kinda disappointed in the u160 drives, both 10K rpms... For the money I would've gone with the 133 ata 5400 or 7200. Good thing the u160 card was given to me by a friend.
But cool the whole damn case, and make sure there is a processor fan on that thing while you're at it...I've seen several gateways that just have a fan blowing from the rear of the case kinda over the heatsink...
ramble mode off.....[:d]