Ok Ponyboy,
Roadblocks and ramming are almost universally considered deadly force. If we say he set up a roadblock or it was ramming it doesn't matter in the sense that they would both be deadly force.
Back in the day, I got into a pursuit going after a guy for 94/45. It lasted 3.4 miles, in 98 seconds. That is an avg. speed of 120+ mph.
It ended when he tried to get on a side street. He spun, repeatdly, leaving 500+ feet of marks. When I got sight of him again, his vehicle lights were off and he was off the left side of the road, stopped, facing the way he had just come from.
I drove until I was 50-75' from him, took the center of the road angling my car's lights at him, and stopped. I didn't open my car door, I was concerned that if he tried fleeing again he would take off my car door and arm.
Well he started coming at me, slowly, he went about 40' before stopping. At that point I used the PA and had him put his hands up. I held him there until more help showed up and arreseted him.
You know what happened, I got written up for unauthorized deadly force. Since he didn't have room to drive around my vehicle, it was a roadblock. I said it couldn't be a roadblock, he was stopped. It can't be deadly force, even if he had accelerated and hit my car the speeds would be too low. I asked if it would have been better to allow him to re-start the pursuit by getting by me? I was told not to initiate a roadblock without persmission.
Does that clear up why I have questions about whether or not someone should just pull out of traffic in front of a pursuit? And I know what the general feeling is on this board about pursuits, you'all don't care for 'em.
Pardon me for trying to debate an incident.