User Panel
Posted: 8/6/2013 12:44:50 PM EDT
Here are the 46 senators that voted to give your rights to the U.N.
Baldwin (D-WI) Baucus (D-MT) Bennett (D-CO) Blumenthal (D-CT) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Coons (D-DE) Cowan (D-MA) Durbin (D-IL) Feinstein (D-CA) Franken (D-MN) Gillibrand (D-NY) Harkin (D-IA) Hirono (D-HI) Johnson (D-SD) Kaine (D-VA) King (I-ME) Klobuchar (D-MN) Landrieu (D-LA) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) McCaskill (D-MO) Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murphy (D-CT) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Schatz (D-HI) Schumer (D-NY) Shaheen (D-NH) Stabenow (D-MI) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Warner (D-VA) Warren (D-MA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR |
|
In other words all the Dems, what a shocker! My state needs get rid of ours!
|
|
Not a single Republican.
But arfcom libs say the two parties are the same! |
|
|
At least our resident flip-flopping waffle-dem here in AR got it right on this one...
|
|
|
Quoted:
So what does this treaty entail? View Quote Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the US Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
so.. wanting to control you in another way is... different? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Not a single Republican. But arfcom libs say the two parties are the same! Only the velocity is different, the direction is the same. BTW, the Patrick Henry Solution FTMFW. |
|
Doubted they'd reach 60, but they didn't even get a majority lol.
|
|
Quoted:
Here are the 46 senators that voted to give your rights to the U.N. Durbin (D-IL) View Quote Shocked I tell you, shocked. |
|
|
Quoted:
Only the velocity is different, the direction is the same. BTW, the Patrick Henry Solution FTMFW. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not a single Republican. But arfcom libs say the two parties are the same! Only the velocity is different, the direction is the same. BTW, the Patrick Henry Solution FTMFW. Even if the prior three boxes fail you, ARFCOMMERS will say you shouldn't have killed people. |
|
Quoted:
Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the US Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does this treaty entail? Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the US Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. You do reliize it takes 67 votes to ratify a treaty. This isnt NY, settle down |
|
Take note New Mexicans, Tom Udall is on that list and he is up for re-election next year.
|
|
If the UN wants to take our guns they should come over here and try.
With their rules of engagement they would get massacred. Actually, that sounds kinda fun |
|
Quoted:
Only the velocity is different, the direction is the same. BTW, the Patrick Henry Solution FTMFW. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not a single Republican. But arfcom libs say the two parties are the same! Only the velocity is different, the direction is the same. BTW, the Patrick Henry Solution FTMFW. Only democrats want to give our rights to a foreign entity. Nice try skippy. Keep stumping for the dems mobies. |
|
Senate treaty ratification requires 2/3 not a simple majority.
Still no excuse for 46 senators ignoring their oath of office. |
|
I see both MD douche bags went the wrong way. What a couple of idiots.
|
|
Claire McCaskill ...one proud Democratic Statist from Missouri
|
|
Quoted:
Only democrats want to give our rights to a foreign entity. Nice try skippy. Keep stumping for the dems mobies. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not a single Republican. But arfcom libs say the two parties are the same! Only the velocity is different, the direction is the same. BTW, the Patrick Henry Solution FTMFW. Only democrats want to give our rights to a foreign entity. Nice try skippy. Keep stumping for the dems mobies. At least we can more easily resist a foreign entity. Once the Feds take our rights, they are gone for good. |
|
|
Uh... those of you talking about shooting at blue helmets...
Who do you think enforces Federal law passed in compliance with international treaty obligation? |
|
Quoted:
Uh... those of you talking about shooting at blue helmets... Who do you think enforces Federal law passed in compliance with international treaty obligation? View Quote I'm not sure they understand how treaties work. I doubt most of the outraged people even know that the country which signs has to pass national legislation to give the treaty any teeth. |
|
Never understood Max Baucus of MT. He must have a hell of a security team.
|
|
So you're saying we have to vote all the democRats out of office
|
|
|
Didn't see NC on there... He must've been too busy playing golf.
|
|
Quoted:
Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the US Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So what does this treaty entail? Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the US Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. Not even close, they needed 2/3 vote of the senate. |
|
|
Quoted:
Not a single Republican. But arfcom libs say the two parties are the same! View Quote Congratulations, you're slightly less statist than the full blown socialists in the Democrat party on some issues. Now we'll just ignore the fact the Reps created the Patriot Act, DHS, and TSA. I don't think any libertarians actually believe that the Reps are the Same as the Dems. Libertarians tend to vote Republican almost elusively except in the rare circumstance that a libertarians is actually on a ballot. But I do believe they are not nearly different enough. There does seem to be a number of dim Republicans who can't distinguish between a Libertarian and a Liberal despite the fact that Liberals always advocate state solutions to all of societys ills while Libertarians see the state as the last worst solution in almost every instance. The biggest difference between the Dems and Reps, is that Republicans tend to be highly nationalist while still being all too statist, while Dems tend to be internationalist, apparently possessing too much statism for just one state! So yes, I prefer nationalist statism over internationalism. But I'd rather no statism at all. Now, if there is some prize for excessive usage of he word "state" you can PM me for my address. |
|
Those 'independents' are fucking liars.
Anyone care to guess the percentage of the time they vote with the democrats?
|
|
|
Quoted:
Those 'independents' are fucking liars. Anyone care to guess the percentage of the time they vote with the democrats? View Quote Sanders is only an "Independent" because "Socialist" isn't an option. In local elections in Burlington, he ran and won openly as a Socialist IIRC. As a Socialist, it makes sense that he would caucus with the Democrat Party. |
|
FTR, bill numbers and such help a LOT in threads like this one.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.