Yes, that is pretty much what i am asking.. Mainly because after i started this post, i was quickly schooled about the term "Sovereign Citizen" which i had no idea about them, or the movement and i had never heard of the term before yesterday- So i backed out of my"A4V" thread pretty quickly to say the least- as that is not where i want to stick my head or waste my time.
But it did bring to mind my question, as to how they were different than the States that have been trying to limit federal power, or have already declared "Sovereignty" as i originally wrote, all of which is based around the word Sovereignty... Your answer is pretty much what i was looking for.
What states have sucessfully done this...if any?
Sorry about my writing, sometimes it is a bit hard to understand as i am still dealing with cognitive and brain injury issues from a severe auto accident, and i sometimes even confuse myself-lol
Gotta keep it light when your down n' out-
Quote History Originally Posted By 25Chuck:
I'm not really sure what your question is, are you asking how the Sovereign Citizens movement is different from State governments trying to limit the power of the Federal government?
You need to understand that Sovereign Citizens basically refuse to follow any Gov't action that they don't agree with. This includes local and state government not just the feds.
SC's also have innumerable weird customs and beliefs that are passed around by word of mouth and based on diluted understanding/intentional misrepresentation of federal law and the Constitution.
For examples see-
The gold fringed "admiralty" flag
Crazy interpretations of squatters rights
Homemade license plates
Sheriff being the only "real" law enforcement (until they disagree with the Sheriff)
Signing "without prejudice" along with or in place of their name on legal documents
View Quote