User Panel
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:20:48 AM EDT
|
|
Pretty much sums it up.
Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? |
|
Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. View Quote Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? |
|
|
|
|
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have?
|
|
Quoted:
Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name |
|
I get why the brits care about it.
However, I have no idea why so many other people in other countries not only care about it, but seemed to be obsessed with it. |
|
Quoted: Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it |
|
|
Quoted:
Please don't misunderstand. Just because I do not give a shit about the British royal family, does not mean I wouldn't be willing to be a part of an international incident should the princess want to have an extramarital affair. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it Not giving a shit is one thing (many people feel the same) but starting a tread to say you don't give a shit is just |
|
Quoted:
Washington was named George too, a very British name View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. |
|
|
Quoted:
Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have? Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country That's one thing I won't knock the royal guys about. They do step up. To be fair, my father is a Scot, and so my only dislike of the British royal family is that damned Prince of Wales who stole the ancient title of my ancestors - Lord of the Isles. And, being the son of a Scot, I was born to right a wrong, you know? |
|
Quoted:
LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. George Washington was a British "subject" |
|
Quoted: Washington was named George too, a very British name View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name |
|
I would rather hear about the royal baby than all of the tripe reported on the first family
|
|
Quoted:
I have a very British name and a very British genome. What does that have to do with giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name You started the thread tough guy |
|
Quoted: Washington was named George too, a very British name View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name Revisionist lies! |
|
Quoted:
George Washington was a British "subject" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. George Washington was a British "subject" Yes, he was. You can tell by the fact he was embarrassed by his fucked up teeth |
|
Quoted:
I have a very British name and a very British genome. What does that have to do with giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name You sure are posting a lot about something you don't give a shit about. |
|
Harry seems cool, gets shitfaced in Vegas then deploys and kills Taliban dudes with a freaking Apache.
|
|
Quoted:
George Washington was a British "subject" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. George Washington was a British "subject" That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British for independence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. |
|
|
Quoted:
Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have? Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country For the family that gave us WWI! |
|
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. View Quote George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George |
|
Quoted:
George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... |
|
Quoted: George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George |
|
Quoted:
George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. |
|
I like the British royals. They are FAR more dignified and respectable than our own "royals".
Having said all of that... I'm tired of hearing about them and the baby. Just friggin let them live their lives already! |
|
Quoted:
People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Ummm, I'll let you in on a little secret.......I'm Irish, our war of Independence ended in 1922 |
|
Quoted:
Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Good for you. Except you gave enough of a shit to post up a thread to whine about it and then reply to your own thread. How many Royal Baby threads have been started by us British members, again?? Zero, Nada, Squat, Bugger-all. Methinks you protest too much. Just saying. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? That's not why we revolted at all. I doubt he thinks that's the actual reason. Probably more of a tongue in cheek thing. |
|
Quoted:
He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway |
|
Quoted:
I like the British royals. They are FAR more dignified and respectable than our own "royals". Having said all of that... I'm tired of hearing about them and the baby. Just friggin let them live their lives already! View Quote People like a good news story, would you rather read more doom & gloom? |
|
Quoted:
He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. History is for fags right? |
|
Quoted:
Ummm, I'll let you in n a little secret.......I'm Irish, our was of Independence ended in 1922 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Ummm, I'll let you in n a little secret.......I'm Irish, our was of Independence ended in 1922 So there's no anti British feelings amongst the Irish anymore? |
|
Quoted:
Good for you. Except you gave enough of a shit to post up a thread to whine about it and then reply to your own thread. How many Royal Baby threads have been started by us British members, again?? Zero, Nada, Squat, Bugger-all. Methinks you protest too much. Just saying. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Good for you. Except you gave enough of a shit to post up a thread to whine about it and then reply to your own thread. How many Royal Baby threads have been started by us British members, again?? Zero, Nada, Squat, Bugger-all. Methinks you protest too much. Just saying. He's a Yankee Doodle Dandy Limey |
|
|
Quoted:
So there's no anti British feelings amongst the Irish anymore? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Ummm, I'll let you in n a little secret.......I'm Irish, our was of Independence ended in 1922 So there's no anti British feelings amongst the Irish anymore? Not really, the fucking Jocks hate the English more than the Irish ever did |
|
Quoted:
People like a good news story, would you rather read more doom & gloom? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I like the British royals. They are FAR more dignified and respectable than our own "royals". Having said all of that... I'm tired of hearing about them and the baby. Just friggin let them live their lives already! People like a good news story, would you rather read more doom & gloom? What's such a great "news story" about this? A baby was born. Who may or may not get to be a figurehead one day if he can outlive the line in front of him. Hey... I think you're tea's getting cold... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? That's not why we revolted at all. Well, alright, there was the whole dental thing as well.... |
|
Quoted:
You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway Really? Do you think if the US had not intertvened in the European conflict, your country would still be around? I'm not being a smart ass, i'm just really curious. That being said, i'll take your royal family news anyday, over the crap that governs my country. |
|
Hey mate's, I forgot to mention, congrats on the new Royal Heir, God Save The Queen and all that.
|
|
Well I'll give it to you boys across the pond, y'all had some awesome grenadiers and Dragoons.
|
|
Quoted:
You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway How soon you forget all the food we sent before 1942, that kept you from starving to death under the U-boat blockade. Does the word SPAM ring any bells? ok, so maybe we kinda owe you guys for the spam thing, but still... |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.