User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:21:44 AM EDT
[#1]
Pretty much sums it up.
Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:28:21 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:28:21 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? That's not why we revolted at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:28:21 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:29:13 AM EDT
[#5]
. double tap.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:29:30 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's not why we revolted at all. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? That's not why we revolted at all. Stop bringing facts into it |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:30:25 AM EDT
[#7]
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:30:55 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:31:28 AM EDT
[#9]
I get why the brits care about it.
However, I have no idea why so many other people in other countries not only care about it, but seemed to be obsessed with it. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:31:42 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:31:55 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have? Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:33:12 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Please don't misunderstand. Just because I do not give a shit about the British royal family, does not mean I wouldn't be willing to be a part of an international incident should the princess want to have an extramarital affair.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? Well you and the cupcake kid are both commenting on it
Not giving a shit is one thing (many people feel the same) but starting a tread to say you don't give a shit is just
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:33:24 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Washington was named George too, a very British name Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:34:22 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have? Yeah, they are pretty much the Targaryens only without the good looks and dragons. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:34:48 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have? Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country That's one thing I won't knock the royal guys about. They do step up. To be fair, my father is a Scot, and so my only dislike of the British royal family is that damned Prince of Wales who stole the ancient title of my ancestors - Lord of the Isles. And, being the son of a Scot, I was born to right a wrong, you know?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:35:24 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. George Washington was a British "subject" 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:35:53 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Washington was named George too, a very British name Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:36:26 AM EDT
[#18]
I would rather hear about the royal baby than all of the tripe reported on the first family
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:36:44 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have a very British name and a very British genome. What does that have to do with giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name
You started the thread tough guy |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:36:44 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Washington was named George too, a very British name Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name Revisionist lies!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:37:14 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
George Washington was a British "subject" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. George Washington was a British "subject" Yes, he was. You can tell by the fact he was embarrassed by his fucked up teeth 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:37:37 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have a very British name and a very British genome. What does that have to do with giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain?
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name
You sure are posting a lot about something you don't give a shit about. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:38:19 AM EDT
[#23]
Harry seems cool, gets shitfaced in Vegas then deploys and kills Taliban dudes with a freaking Apache.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:39:35 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
George Washington was a British "subject" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Washington was named George too, a very British name LOL! Not really. Well, not exclusively British, at least. George Washington was a British "subject" That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British for independence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:41:26 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Harry seems cool, gets shitfaced in Vegas then deploys and kills Taliban dudes with a freaking Apache. Yeah, we all do that over here 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:42:07 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
As inbred as those Euro Royal Families have been over the centuries, my only curiosity about the birth is, how many toes does the kid have? Probably enough toes to fill an Army boot in 20 years and serve his country For the family that gave us WWI! |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:44:57 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:51:31 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George 
People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:53:51 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela The new Prince has been named George |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:54:51 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:57:08 AM EDT
[#31]
I like the British royals. They are FAR more dignified and respectable than our own "royals".
Having said all of that... I'm tired of hearing about them and the baby. Just friggin let them live their lives already! |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:57:51 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George
People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Ummm, I'll let you in on a little secret.......I'm Irish, our war of Independence ended in 1922 |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:58:24 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Good for you. Except you gave enough of a shit to post up a thread to whine about it and then reply to your own thread. How many Royal Baby threads have been started by us British members, again?? Zero, Nada, Squat, Bugger-all. Methinks you protest too much. Just saying. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:59:11 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? I said that decades ago when the media broadcasted the wedding of Diana to Chuckles. Any decent American should not give a sh*t about what the royals do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 9:59:46 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I get why the brits care about it. However, I have no idea why so many other people in other countries not only care about it, but seemed to be obsessed with it.
It is a source of befuddlement to us too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:01:01 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's not why we revolted at all. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? That's not why we revolted at all. I doubt he thinks that's the actual reason. Probably more of a tongue in cheek thing.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:01:01 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:01:45 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I like the British royals. They are FAR more dignified and respectable than our own "royals". Having said all of that... I'm tired of hearing about them and the baby. Just friggin let them live their lives already! People like a good news story, would you rather read more doom & gloom? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:01:55 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. History is for fags right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:02:44 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ummm, I'll let you in n a little secret.......I'm Irish, our was of Independence ended in 1922 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George
People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Ummm, I'll let you in n a little secret.......I'm Irish, our was of Independence ended in 1922 So there's no anti British feelings amongst the Irish anymore? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:02:48 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good for you. Except you gave enough of a shit to post up a thread to whine about it and then reply to your own thread. How many Royal Baby threads have been started by us British members, again?? Zero, Nada, Squat, Bugger-all. Methinks you protest too much. Just saying. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. My ancestors fought under Washington in the Continental Army. The fought a very tough, bloody war for the slim chance that they and their posterity would have the right to not give a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. I honor their dedication and their sacrifice, by not giving a shit about the royal family of Great Britain. Good for you. Except you gave enough of a shit to post up a thread to whine about it and then reply to your own thread. How many Royal Baby threads have been started by us British members, again?? Zero, Nada, Squat, Bugger-all. Methinks you protest too much. Just saying. He's a Yankee Doodle Dandy Limey |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:03:42 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Harry seems cool, gets shitfaced in Vegas then deploys and kills Taliban dudes with a freaking Apache. Yeah, he does seem like he knows how to have a good time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:03:48 AM EDT
[#43]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:04:32 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So there's no anti British feelings amongst the Irish anymore? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George
People say the war of independence happened a long time ago, get over it. Wonder what the Irish and the Scots think of all this... Ummm, I'll let you in n a little secret.......I'm Irish, our was of Independence ended in 1922 So there's no anti British feelings amongst the Irish anymore? Not really, the fucking Jocks hate the English more than the Irish ever did |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:04:33 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
People like a good news story, would you rather read more doom & gloom? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I like the British royals. They are FAR more dignified and respectable than our own "royals". Having said all of that... I'm tired of hearing about them and the baby. Just friggin let them live their lives already! People like a good news story, would you rather read more doom & gloom? What's such a great "news story" about this? A baby was born. Who may or may not get to be a figurehead one day if he can outlive the line in front of him.
Hey... I think you're tea's getting cold...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:06:43 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's not why we revolted at all. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Pretty much sums it up. Didn't we revolt against these people so we wouldn't have to care about them anymore? That's not why we revolted at all. Well, alright, there was the whole dental thing as well.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:07:36 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway Really? Do you think if the US had not intertvened in the European conflict, your country would still be around? I'm not being a smart ass, i'm just really curious. That being said, i'll take your royal family news anyday, over the crap that governs my country. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:09:04 AM EDT
[#48]
Hey mate's, I forgot to mention, congrats on the new Royal Heir, God Save The Queen and all that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:12:07 AM EDT
[#49]
Well I'll give it to you boys across the pond, y'all had some awesome grenadiers and Dragoons.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2013 10:13:48 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's not relevant to my comment. I am aware that George Washington led a "civil war" against the British foendence. That doesn't mean that his name is an exclusively British name. There are many cultures who use the name "George" (or a version of it) that have nothing to do with Britain. George Washington was a British subject, who rebelled and became a terrorist, a bit like Mandela
The new Prince has been named George He did not become a terrorist because he did not kill innocent people. Are you lot still mad about losing that war? You shouldn't be, we saved your ass in 2 world wars. You should be thanking us. Cool about the name, and British people do like to use the name George, but that doesn't make George an exclusively British name. You didn't save my ass. In 1917 you were 3 years late and in 1942 you were over 2 years late. By which time Britian had saved its own asses, all you did was help with the liberation of Europe, along with the British, Canadians, Free French, Italians, Russians, Indians and a load of African troops, as well as some Kiwi and Aussie troops. But thanks for the help anyway How soon you forget all the food we sent before 1942, that kept you from starving to death under the U-boat blockade.  Does the word SPAM ring any bells?
ok, so maybe we kinda owe you guys for the spam thing, but still...
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
