Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 10/17/2002 8:07:21 AM EDT
Originally posted by Another Patriot in FLA:

[QB]Posted on Wed, Oct. 09, 2002
SWAT team invades elderly widow's home
By Stu Bykofsky
Daily News Columnist

IT'S 10 a.m. on a quiet Sunday morning in Oxford Circle. The coffee's making, the birds are chirping.

An elderly widow is in her bathroom, toweling off after a shower.

A four-member Philadelphia Police Department SWAT team arrives - clutching a search warrant for guns and drugs - and pounds on her Sylvester Street door.

A neighbor hollers to the cops they've got the wrong house. They tell her to shut up and go back inside.

With the pounding unanswered - the 4-foot-8, 85-year-old grandmother doesn't know the sound is coming from her own door - the SWAT team pulls out a battering ram to break down the front door.

It doesn't yield because, for safety's sake, the widow's son had it reinforced some years back.

Undeterred, the SWAT team places an explosive charge on the door just as the widow, Sandy Cohen, is walking down the stairs from the second floor to the living room.

"They blew off her front door with an explosive device and entered in full gear with lasers pointed toward her chest," said her son, Steve Cohen, who lives on the West Coast but rushed home to Philly after the incident.

Sandy Cohen raised her arms defensively and told the armed cops they were in the wrong house, according to her son.

"That's what everyone says," one officer scoffed, according to the 55-year-old Cohen, a journalist who was general manager of WCAU-TV from 1983 to 1990.

His mother, who has heart problems, was standing in the middle of the smoke-filled room, coughing.

After a quick inspection, the cops lowered their weapons and lifted their visors.

"It looks like we got the wrong house," Cohen quotes one of them as saying.

"The SWAT team acted appropriately, once they realized what they did," said Cohen. "We are not anti-cop here."

But a horrible - and almost tragic - mistake was made and Cohen wants some answers. To get them, he hired attorney Gilbert Scutti, who sent letters to city solicitor Nelson Diaz and Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson on Oct. 1.

Scutti termed the actions of the police "indefensible; it creates a grotesquerie of police work... it is only through the greatest good fortune that the price she paid was not the ultimate one: the same abject ineptitude that drove this cast of incompetents to make violent entry into her home could have resulted in her being fatally wounded."

Scutti intends to file a civil rights and personal injury lawsuit in federal court in 30 days, he said in the letter, to "plumb the depths of the incompetence of all responsible parties." The letter told both Johnson and Diaz that Scutti was available to discuss the incident prior to filing suit.

As of yesterday, Scutti had not been contacted either by police or the city solicitor.

Johnson was out of town yesterday but had Karen Simmons, his senior legal counsel, speak to me.

"The Police Department is currently looking into the matter to see what happened," she said.

Milton Velez, a special assistant to Diaz, told me he was researching the case and "we are trying to address the situation."

While seemingly livid in his letter, Scutti can't be characterized as anti-cop. From 1972 to 1978, he was the chief of the criminal division of the U.S. attorney's office in Philadelphia.

For my part, I would like to hear about the procedures that resulted in the raid on Sandy Cohen's house. The cops had a warrant based on information from an informer, who was either mistaken or lying.

One question that hangs in the air is whether the cops performed any surveillance or investigation before bursting into a widow's home, guns drawn, scaring her nearly half to death.

Something is wrong here in addition to the address on the search warrant.

[URL=http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/4243257.htm]http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/4243257.htm[/URL]

*********
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:12:42 AM EDT
[#1]
Very disturbing. I also question the pre-raid intelligence. If they took even five minutes to verify that they had the right placeI would be impressed. This one has JBT written all over it.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:26:16 AM EDT
[#2]
HOW DARE A PEE-ON SERF TRY TO TELL THE JBT'S THEY HAVE THE WRONG HOUSE !!!!  THEY ARE LUCKY THEY WERE NOT KICKED TO THE CURB FOR BEING MOUTHY !!
What a fucking joke. Why can't these ninja wannabe's get their info verified BEFORE they go breaking down someones door ?!?!?!
This poor woman is lucky she was'nt shot in the face and her house burned to the ground.  I hope they sue the shit out of them.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:27:38 AM EDT
[#3]
Isn't this where the LEO supporters step up and claim [i]"we don't know the whole story.  This women was probably involved in something.  They don't just raid the wrong people"[/i].  Or something like that.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:31:52 AM EDT
[#4]
Would't their mothers be proud!

Death to tyrants!
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:34:56 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Isn't this where the LEO supporters step up and claim [i]"we don't know the whole story.  This women was probably involved in something.  They don't just raid the wrong people"[/i].  Or something like that.
View Quote


Well, that along with the standard holier than thou responses and labeling people as COP BASHERS !!!
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:44:07 AM EDT
[#6]
What are you all complaining about? The police knocked.

What's important is that all officers involved got home safe for their families that night.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:47:32 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Would't their mothers be proud!

Death to tyrants!
View Quote


I'd settle for being able to hold them criminally and civilly accountable in the courts. If we were able to sue them [b]personally[/b] for their actions, we would see a behavior change pronto. Unfortunatly, the taxpayer pays both ways for these idiots. We pay for their wages/equipment, then pay when they fvck up THEIR job! What a deal....[rolleyes]
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:53:34 AM EDT
[#8]
Ya know,
all this kind of shit tells me is these ninja wannabees are shooting from the hip....................if your doing your job right and doing it professionally.........you  have this little step called.........RECON!

friggin amatuers
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:55:49 AM EDT
[#9]
Where are all the boys defending this anyway?

Link Posted: 10/17/2002 8:59:11 AM EDT
[#10]
PHILADELPHIA??? AGAIN??? WHERE THE HELL DO THEY GET THEIR COPS??? THE PSYCHO WARD??? TRAINING CENTERS FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED???
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 9:02:17 AM EDT
[#11]
So, I know everybody else is dying to know...

how much crack did they find in her coochie?
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:08:50 AM EDT
[#12]
just be glad she didnt go down stairs with a gun or she would be dead now.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:16:53 AM EDT
[#13]
Here we go again. When will you cop bashers get it through your thick skulls that [b]WE ARE AT WAR!!!!!!!!!!!![/b] In order to be effective in anti-terrorism operations, like the IDF and Mossad, there has to be an acceptible level of collateral damage. It is a very small price to pay in defending our great democracy.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:17:27 AM EDT
[#14]
Do you have a url for this article? tia
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:22:56 AM EDT
[#15]
whaddya get when you breed the keystone cops with heinrich himler???
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:25:00 AM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Do you have a url for this article? tia
View Quote


Did ya actually [i]read[/i] the article?  [;)]

Hint - it's at the bottom - [url]www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/4243257.htm[/url]
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:27:35 AM EDT
[#17]
So tell me this-- what would have happened if she had a gun on her hand, or shot at the "intruders"???

This crap happens WAY TOO OFTEN.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:31:15 AM EDT
[#18]
that f*ckin b1tch had it commin'. barricded door?  yeah she was in the shower flushing all that meth down the drain. AND had the coffee pot brewing unattended. what did she expect a key to the city. f*cking birds were probably look-outs.
yeah, she was coughing all right, from the hit she took off that crack pipe.
 
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:43:03 AM EDT
[#19]
feel sorry for the swat dudes! could you imagine the horror of comin the door to see an 85 year old lady that just got out of the shower?!

EEWWWWWWW!

[whacko]
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:46:13 AM EDT
[#20]
LMFAO, Cohiba!  

Looks like granny is [Jefferson's Theme][i]movin' on up---to the east side, to a deluxe apartment in the sky. [/i][/Jefferson's Theme]

Sue the ass off those bastards, and teach them to read.  If they are as culpable as they sound, those morons should lose their jobs and be required to pay restitution out of their own hides.  How unfortunate that they will likely be able to hide behind the shield of
police immunity.  

Sad, but for some reason I am not surprised by this crap and nonsense.  

That being said, people in every profession mess up- doctors remove the wrong leg, dentists can drill on the wrong tooth.  When a cop screws up, things get serious.
   
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:48:54 AM EDT
[#21]
This is Philadelphia, home of the "2 lbs of C4 + 5 gallons of gasoline = 60 homes burned down"
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 10:57:52 AM EDT
[#22]
To call this incident pathetic would be a gross understatement.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:01:21 AM EDT
[#23]
Except for the bad recon and the wrong address, they acted correctly. I do believe that this negligence warrants some lost jobs and a second pension for the elderly woman.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:15:40 AM EDT
[#24]
i wonder if granny ever peeled her wet tires when a leaving a carwash?
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:24:38 AM EDT
[#25]
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:30:24 AM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
Originally posted by Another Patriot in FLA:

For my part, I would like to hear about the procedures that resulted in the raid on Sandy Cohen's house. The cops had a warrant based on information from an informer, who was either mistaken or lying.

One question that hangs in the air is whether the cops performed any surveillance or investigation before bursting into a widow's home, guns drawn, scaring her nearly half to death.

Something is wrong here in addition to the address on the search warrant.

View Quote


"Wrong house" imply's they went to the wrong address. These last three paragraphs make it clear they went to the house they were sent to, the one listed on the warrant.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:35:06 AM EDT
[#27]
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:36:51 AM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:

"Wrong house" imply's they went to the wrong address. These last three paragraphs make it clear they went to the house they were sent to, the one listed on the warrant.
View Quote



So what are you trying to say, that they were "just following orders"??
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:37:43 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Do you have a url for this article? tia
View Quote


Did ya actually [i]read[/i] the article?  [;)]

Hint - it's at the bottom - [url]www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/4243257.htm[/url]
View Quote


Oh yeah...thanks...Rust Never Sleeps..but sometimes it isnt paying attention...hehe
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 11:44:32 AM EDT
[#30]
[Cartman] Are you questioning my ATHORITEE!!! I will come to your house, kick in your door, and KILL you. You better shut up fat ass!!![/Cartman]

Another reason no knock raids should not be done. Luckily this one didn't end in death like the one BenDover posted about not too long ago.

I'd wager if we compared notes. We'd expose more no-knock related deaths than accidental firearm deaths.

I like LEO's (you have to say that to avoid an anti-leo bias) but I fear this militatarization mind set.

It's one thing to be equipped to do a job, but another thing to be ready to use violent and deadly force against average citizens.

I'm glad the neigboor wasn't shot in order to protect the suprise of the no-knock. Imagine if the neighbor had used a cell phone to call the old lady to tell her to come to her door and open up as cops were about to bust it down. Would he have been killed as an accomplis who was going to blow to operation? If the old lady had opened the door with a cell phone in hand, wouuld she have been killed by an officer pumped up on adrenelin scared shitless and ready to shoot it out with bad guys?

The bad thing about all this is no one will be punished except for the tax payers. Who will be the ones paying the bill to defend these POS's and their fines after wards.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 1:56:21 PM EDT
[#31]
ok then,

What would happen if the persons house(which was the wrong house) shot at these SWAT members at night not knowing it was Law Enforcement? Ofcourse they would prolly not be alive to tell their side. But would they be in the wrong? If they lived could they be prosecuted for murder?
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 2:04:02 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
ok then,

What would happen if the persons house(which was the wrong house) shot at these SWAT members at night not knowing it was Law Enforcement? Ofcourse they would prolly not be alive to tell their side. But would they be in the wrong? If they lived could they be prosecuted for murder?
View Quote



They would be dead, but if they lived they would be treated like a cop killer even though it was the cops that fucked up.  
You have a right to defend your home and family against home invasion........EXCEPT if its the cops doing the home invasion.
Pretty nice double standard huh.
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 2:08:07 PM EDT
[#33]
Boy I sure hope those Swat guys had belt fed weapons to protect them from granny. That son of hers should go to jail for reinforcing that door, a policeman could have been hurt while trying to break in the door. And some of you wonder why people think cops have too much power, or don't deserve unquestioned respect. [whacko]
Link Posted: 10/17/2002 2:10:57 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
i wonder if granny ever peeled her wet tires when a leaving a carwash?
View Quote




ROTFLMFAO!!!

Be right back - gotta clean up my monitor....
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 1:30:36 AM EDT
[#35]
All that hard work reinforcing the door just to have jbt's blow it up.  I bet they were wearing masks too.
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 2:10:47 AM EDT
[#36]
she had it coming... I "heard" she was running a bingo number's racket! [whacko]





I betcha it was a "new" swat team that wanted to practice it's newly learned entry techniques, can't blame 'em for trying someplace safe! [rolleyes]
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 5:21:16 AM EDT
[#37]
A few years ago a Denver SWAT team raided a house. Yup, wrong address. The home owner just happened to be inside cleaning a pistol. He popped, and killed the first cop through the door. For whatever unfathomable reason the rest of the invaders didn't light him up. He was simply arrested for murder.

Colorado has what the press love to call "the Make-my-day law." You CAN shoot home invaders.

When the trial came around the judge looked at the facts, wrong address on the search warrent, home owner in the right. Case dismissed.

Score one for the good guys. And yes, my condolences go out to the officer's family. But there is NO excuse for raiding the wrong house. And one officer paid the ultimate price, for once.
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 5:39:44 AM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:

"Wrong house" imply's they went to the wrong address. These last three paragraphs make it clear they went to the house they were sent to, the one listed on the warrant.
View Quote


Yeah, that still means there was a collosal screw up.

I don't think that the SWAT cops that are given a warrant to execute, through the chain of commnand, signed by a Judge, etc. etc. Should have to launch their own investigation into whether or not the warrant is up to their standards.

However the detective, officer, etc that gathered the info, completed a report, applied for a warrant ect. SHOULD BE PRESENT WHEN THE WARRANT IS SERVED.

Now if they go to the wrong house........Wouldn't the investigating officer be able to stop a "wrong address" warrant from being served.

I haven't read the article. I would say that the investigating officer should be in signifigant trouble.

I wonder if he didn't have a snitch........saw a reinforced door............ and made up some of his info.
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 5:48:28 AM EDT
[#39]
What would you guys recommend is the best way to "reinforce" my doors??? hehe (seriously)

Nothing illegal about it....
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 5:52:27 AM EDT
[#40]

I'd settle for being able to hold them criminally and civilly accountable in the courts.
View Quote


Bowers vs. DeVito & many others.
Cops can't be held liable for their actions. The city can but the Cops can't. I believe the woman legally would have to file against her homeowners insurance for repair costs though the PD or city may pick up the tab to save face.
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 6:29:10 AM EDT
[#41]
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 6:41:23 AM EDT
[#42]
Yeah, I think my dept has something like 20,000 warrants on file.

Most of the time arrest warrants are served, kinda like telemarketers, cold knock. Knock, knock,..... Hello, hello is Joe here? Just a sec......Hello Joe.... I know....

Search warrants, like this sounds like, are generally "time sensitive" meaning the warrant has a "use by" date on it, usually a week from issuance. Generally they are issued in active investigations. So the investigator should have recent contact, surveillance, and evidence gathering done.

There really is no excuse to get a search warrant listing the wrong address.

I think tho' the set time requirement would be very cumbersome, and very easy to counteract by BG's.  
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 10:34:05 AM EDT
[#43]
Quoted:
What would you guys recommend is the best way to "reinforce" my doors??? hehe (seriously)

Nothing illegal about it....
View Quote


IT IS ILLEGAL in some states to reinforce the entry points of your home as to impede entry by police or firefighters.

If you still want to be a criminal, there are instructions in "Patriots: Surviving The Coming Collapse".
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 11:15:33 AM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
Quoted:
What would you guys recommend is the best way to "reinforce" my doors??? hehe (seriously)

Nothing illegal about it....
View Quote


IT IS ILLEGAL in some states to reinforce the entry points of your home as to impede entry by police or firefighters.

If you still want to be a criminal, there are instructions in "Patriots: Surviving The Coming Collapse".
View Quote


Ever hear of Windows?
Link Posted: 10/18/2002 6:51:18 PM EDT
[#45]
if she had had a heart attack from the scare would they have been charged with felony murder?
afterall, it was the wrong house, so technially they were breaking and entering
Link Posted: 10/20/2002 9:25:47 AM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
if she had had a heart attack from the scare would they have been charged with felony murder?
afterall, it was the wrong house, so technially they were breaking and entering
View Quote


Yeah, a conspiracy, and they were armed, used an explosive device, etc.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top