User Panel
Posted: 4/26/2013 12:04:25 PM EDT
Decent rifle, or avoid? I do like the light weight.
|
|
The general consensus has been to avoid them. Too brittle of a material to hold up to the repeated stresses of firing, if I recall correctly...
|
|
Avoid.
I have no personal experience but I have heard a lot about them and what I've heard was not good. |
|
Well, I'm pretty sure the rapper Plies has one.
Heard one of his songs recently (wasn't good) and heard him say, ".223.......Carbon 1-5" |
|
Quoted:
Decent rifle, or avoid? I do like the light weight. Crap rifle. |
|
I was selling those 10-12 years ago at 'shows here in the NorthWest.
Our "Rule-Of-Thumb" was that we got back 4 of every 10 we sold (Before and after the buyout). Neat idea but...terrible execution When your BBL separates from the upper receiver.....it's a BAD thing! |
|
I had one and it worked flawlessly. It was great for plinking, don't have experience with a lot of heavy use. Accuracy was decent. Lots of people will give negative opinions. I don't think they qualify for tier one operators... |
|
Quoted:
I was selling those 10-12 years ago at 'shows here in the NorthWest. Our "Rule-Of-Thumb" was that we got back 4 of every 10 we sold (Before and after the buyout). Neat idea but...terrible execution When your BBL separates from the upper receiver.....it's a BAD thing! I think you'd have to vet current production owners to get a real idea, unless the rifle has not changed at all since its introduction. Composite material development has come a long way in 10 years... not to mention any design fixes that may have been applied. Having said that, seems logical to avoid old ones. And I also think they should be a lot cheaper to justify the risk. Lightness should only be a cost premium if it comes with no other trade off. |
|
Owned one back in '03, I remember stripping the plastic threads on one once... buttstock maybe?
It was confiscated and I never got it back. Can't say I miss it. |
|
Quoted:
I have 5k rounds through mine with no problems. i have one of them, with about the same round count through it + several k .22lr. Ive only had one issue and it was with some wolf ammo (case rim tore off). I also rarely clean this gun, and have dropped it several times. I dont use it much any more since i have other AR i like to shoot more, but ive neer had any major issues with mine. |
|
I had a type 97 from the original manufacturer of the Carbon 15 before BM bought it. Professional ordnance I think it was. Worked great. No problems.
|
|
Quoted: You may be right man. MY experience with them IS rather dated.Quoted: I was selling those 10-12 years ago at 'shows here in the NorthWest. Our "Rule-Of-Thumb" was that we got back 4 of every 10 we sold (Before and after the buyout). Neat idea but...terrible execution When your BBL separates from the upper receiver.....it's a BAD thing! I think you'd have to vet current production owners to get a real idea, unless the rifle has not changed at all since its introduction. Composite material development has come a long way in 10 years... not to mention any design fixes that may have been applied. Having said that, seems logical to avoid old ones. And I also think they should be a lot cheaper to justify the risk. Lightness should only be a cost premium if it comes with no other trade off. I just remember being tired of our customers coming back to us with broken shit and wanting a rebate or trade |
|
The real questions... What is the asking price and what are your plans for it?
$7-800 range and you only plan to plink plink with it on occasion that's one thing. If they want something in the $1k range, skip it and pick up a Walmart Colt or DPMS for the same price. |
|
|
|
|
|
Only one I ever saw in the wild was in two pieces. A guy in my club had just bought it and about the fourth round he fired it blew up. I looked over and he was standing there with the upper in one hand and the lower in the other, minus several chunks of both receivers and a pants load by the look on his face. I went over and checked on him and he was OK, just shook up. He was firing factory ammo. I think they replaced it for him, but I don't think he kept it. I never really wanted one after that.
|
|
I had one. I put about 3000 rounds through it without problem. I read about the lower's breaking, so I sold it for a $300 profit Dec of 2008.
|
|
Quoted:
I have 5k rounds through mine with no problems. I put at least 4k of xm193 and a few hundred rounds of xm855 through mine before I swapped the upper to a PSA 1:7 twist. Never had a problem with the poly upper,but I got spooked when I saw the pic of the one that did its Glock impression. |
|
I sold one for $1300 or so during the sandy hook panic. I think that was about double what it cost in 2009.
Really crappy trigger pull and not too accurate. It was light though. |
|
It's an entry level rifle. I had one. Worked great and then I upgraded.
|
|
It is made from carbon fiber. The same material that is used in Batman's suit of armor. It also allows him to fly through the air like a bat. It has a tonsil strength, well I don't know the number, but it is 7 times greater than ford aluminum lowers.
It is Tier A Numba One like the Duke of New York. |
|
I have one in 9mm and have had zero problems after a few thousand rounds. It sits in the safe most of the time...
|
|
They have a proprietary barrel nut, IIRC. I remember a guy brought one into the shop and he wanted a quad rail added. Seems like my boss had to order a certain Daniel rail that would work with the barrel nut.
Don't remember exactly what the issue was but it was not Plug-N-Play like other brands. jonblack |
|
That rifle is why I started a build.. It felt like my nephews toy AR and made me nervous.
|
|
I think the newer ones are supposed to be ok. Don't really appeal to me though.
|
|
Quoted:
They have a proprietary barrel nut, IIRC. I remember a guy brought one into the shop and he wanted a quad rail added. Seems like my boss had to order a certain Daniel rail that would work with the barrel nut. Don't remember exactly what the issue was but it was not Plug-N-Play like other brands. jonblack According to this Thread "The carbon reciever threads are thicker so the carbon barrel nut wont fit on a standard reciever, its too big." IDK tho because i installed a knights armament M5 ras on mine with no issues. |
|
I have owned one for a few years now. It is my dedicated Slide Fire stock range toy. I only bought it because a buddy needed some quick cash a few years ago so I figured what the hell and gave him $400 for it. It does not like steel case ammo at all. Failure to extract just about every other round. It eats up any brass I run through it.
I am definitely over the 4,000 round count with the slidefire stock on it. Not one thing has broke on it yet. For the cost of a new one these days , about $750 - $900 depending on who is selling it , I would pass. You can get a tougher built DPMS , Stag , S&W etc. with aluminum receivers. If you are getting a hell of a deal on it , $600 or less then I say go for it. In all honesty though it is the last AR15 I would recommend to anyone because of the polymer receivers. Maybe if the upper was aluminum I would like them at today's prices a little more. If it is going to be your one and only AR ,then it is a definite no. |
|
Pound for pound the most devastating firearm in bushmasters fabled line up.
|
|
I saw one at sportsman's last week, it was $699. They only had two AR's, that one and a LMC 308 for $3000. |
|
I shot one last weekend that was converted to 3 round burst. It ran like a top.
I can't tell you how old it was, etc, but I have a few credible witnesses that will vouch for me. Many of them shot it, too. |
|
I have one of the Carbon .22LR guns it's fun but I wouldn't buy one in .556 (I bought a Vulcan for that before I found ARFCOM)
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
They have a proprietary barrel nut, IIRC. I remember a guy brought one into the shop and he wanted a quad rail added. Seems like my boss had to order a certain Daniel rail that would work with the barrel nut. Don't remember exactly what the issue was but it was not Plug-N-Play like other brands. jonblack According to this Thread "The carbon reciever threads are thicker so the carbon barrel nut wont fit on a standard reciever, its too big." IDK tho because i installed a knights armament M5 ras on mine with no issues. Probably the Omega, which attaches over the standard delta ring/barrel nut setup. |
|
So the uppers suck--I get that. What about the lowers? Seems like it may be an OK way to shed an ounce or two if they mate up to a normal upper.
|
|
Did a Gunsite Carbine Course a couple years back. A guy had a Carbon 15. We fired a LOT of rounds over a week or so. His weapon ran flawless. It was really, really light... I'd like one.
Most folks with FIRST HAND experience like em. YMMV.
|
|
I liked the range rental 9mm at the range I RSO'd.
Thing was pretty fucking slick, and light as HELL. Gave the HK USC a run for it's money for sure. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.