User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 1:42:40 PM EDT
[#1]
Yep, I'd hit that!
I'd like to hit her hubby too, but in a different way.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 1:43:23 PM EDT
[#2]
I'd roger her vigorously.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 1:50:22 PM EDT
[#3]
Who said not hot?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 1:59:14 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted: Who said not hot? At least one guy in this thread: [url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=145989[/url] And others on other threads about her have expressed such dillusional thoughts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:03:08 PM EDT
[#5]
[img]http://thewolfweb.com/photos/InsaneMan/fullsize/0098.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:11:19 PM EDT
[#6]
Uh, yeah. I'd bang that skinny ass all the time asking "who's your daddy now?".
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:17:44 PM EDT
[#7]
[img]http://www.anncoulter.org/images/webimages/gun.jpg[/img]
Her? [;)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:20:13 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted: Uh, yeah. I'd bang that skinny ass all the time asking "who's your daddy now?". And she would be calling out some other guy's name in response.[:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:21:13 PM EDT
[#9]
Who is she? Anyone have some pics?
SorryOciffer |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:25:55 PM EDT
[#10]
Yeah, I'd smack it.(if I weren't married)
AB |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:27:59 PM EDT
[#11]
Uh, LarryG, once she understood the full depth of my involvement, there could only be one thing for her to say, "your my daddy, rainman".[;)]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 2:32:32 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted: Who is she? Anyone have some pics? SorryOciffer Internet search or search on this site......... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 3:00:52 PM EDT
[#13]
Hit it?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 3:58:22 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted: Hit it? nother term to have sex with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 4:05:01 PM EDT
[#15]
I've woke up with worse.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 4:05:33 PM EDT
[#16]
I'd tap that - definitely.
I'd make her teeth whiter too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 4:34:15 PM EDT
[#17]
she is more that worthy of a hit, heck i'd go for the long haul, yup, marriage
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 4:34:44 PM EDT
[#18]
Put me down for a double tap..[:)] [img]http://www.earlham.edu/~publicaf/photos/events-01/AnnCoulter.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 4:51:29 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted: At least one guy in this thread: [url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=145989[/url] I'm that "one guy" In the other thread people were talking about "licking her sweaty armpits" and other rather strange desires. Apparently my standards are higher than most here when it comes to assigning the word "hot" to someone. Physically, I think she looks very worn. Seeing her without makeup on would probably be a frightening experience. Maybe it's because I'm a college student and she's so much older than I am, not to mention the fact that I see so many more attractive women everyday. I don't read Ann's columns because of her appearance. Most of what she writes is excellent--and that is enough. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 5:30:40 PM EDT
[#20]
Quoted: Quoted: At least one guy in this thread: [url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=145989[/url] I'm that "one guy" In the other thread people were talking about "licking her sweaty armpits" and other rather strange desires. Apparently my standards are higher than most here when it comes to assigning the word "hot" to someone. Physically, I think she looks very worn. Seeing her without makeup on would probably be a frightening experience. Maybe it's because I'm a college student and she's so much older than I am, not to mention the fact that I see so many more attractive women everyday. I don't read Ann's columns because of her appearance. Most of what she writes is excellent--and that is enough. zonan, you have no taste. furthermore, you wouldn't recognize a hot woman if she stuck a glowing poker up your tight ass. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 5:35:05 PM EDT
[#21]
Laura Ingraham is more my type, but just to make you guys happy...
[img]http://thewolfweb.com/photos/Rhox/fullsize/3631.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 5:43:27 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted: zonan, you have no taste. furthermore, you wouldn't recognize a hot woman if she stuck a glowing poker up your tight ass. Oh, here come the flames. Gee, I sure am sorry that I have higher standards than you as to what I consider "hot" Since half the women on my college campus are [i]physically[/i] more attractive than ann coulter, many of whom I consider to be "hot", I guess that means that I do recognize a hot woman even without a "glowing poker" being inserted into my rectum. If you find ann coulter hot, then you must have never gone to college. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 5:57:28 PM EDT
[#23]
[img]www.dimensional.com/~mwluse/bush.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 8:57:58 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted: Quoted: At least one guy in this thread: [url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=145989[/url] I'm that "one guy" In the other thread people were talking about "licking her sweaty armpits" and other rather strange desires. Apparently my standards are higher than most here when it comes to assigning the word "hot" to someone. Physically, I think she looks very worn. Seeing her without makeup on would probably be a frightening experience. Maybe it's because I'm a college student and she's so much older than I am, not to mention the fact that I see so many more attractive women everyday. I don't read Ann's columns because of her appearance. Most of what she writes is excellent--and that is enough. And that is part of her appeal and part of what makes her hot. Most of those babes on campus are probably liberal bitches who would take our guns or bimbos or both. Knock it off with the 'higher standards' BS, as if you are better than other people. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 9:47:16 PM EDT
[#25]
Since half the women on my college campus are [i]physically[/i] more attractive than ann coulter, many of whom I consider to be "hot", I guess that means that I do recognize a hot woman even without a "glowing poker" being inserted into my rectum. If you find ann coulter hot, then you must have never gone to college. Whoa there cowboy! Back the truck up! Both you and I know you'd hit it. I'd hit it, you'd hit it too. Those college girls are nothing special, just open your eyes. If you think I went to a college without any hot girls... [URL]http://www.playboy.com/playmates/personal/jodiannpaterson/scrapbook.html[/URL] Yep... she's a beaver. But most of them are just your everyday girl next door - only a lot of them in one place, no doubt there are some good specimens there. Come on dude, I'd hit it.... you can admit it too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 9:53:31 PM EDT
[#26]
... who's the fag?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 11:08:00 PM EDT
[#27]
Quoted: And that is part of her appeal and part of what makes her hot. Then nevermind. When we were throwing the word "hot" around, for some reason I assumed you all meant [i]physical[/i] beauty. If you want someone intelligent to talk to, then by all means.... Most of those babes on campus are probably liberal bitches who would take our guns or bimbos or both. I agree. They are simply physically more attractive. That is all. Knock it off with the 'higher standards' Apparently I do have higher standards, as I don't want to "hit" everyone that happens to be an intelligent female under the age of 60. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 11:11:16 PM EDT
[#28]
MMMMMM 60. Is that the beer talking?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 11:19:44 PM EDT
[#29]
Quoted: ... Apparently I do have higher standards, as I don't want to "hit" everyone that happens to be an intelligent female under the age of 60. .... Ahhh, the graces of being "Middle Aged", 'tis a good thing! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2002 11:31:54 PM EDT
[#30]
[size=5]And She Cooks Too!![/size=5]
[img]http://images.ucomics.com/comics/jd/2002/jd020928.gif[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2002 2:39:48 AM EDT
[#31]
I feel obligated to stand up for Zonan here (nobody else seems to willing to step up) -
While politically she is definitely "hot," physically she is - IMHO - : 1) too skinny 2) and there is something "off" about her ears Don't get me wrong - I am not the shallow type to judge people on such superficial things, but I didn't start the thread either. Perhaps my young age is talking also. As I am only 27, she also looks "old" to me. Adam |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2002 6:33:37 AM EDT
[#32]
Quoted: I feel obligated to stand up for Zonan here (nobody else seems to willing to step up) - While politically she is definitely "hot," physically she is - IMHO - : 1) too skinny 2) and there is something "off" about her ears Don't get me wrong - I am not the shallow type to judge people on such superficial things, but I didn't start the thread either. Perhaps my young age is talking also. As I am only 27, she also looks "old" to me. Adam Oh dear, you and zonan have a life of torment ahead. You're doomed to taking rulers and calipers on dates to measure the symmetry of her face, scales to check her weight, and probably you'll take her back to your place to float her in the bathtub to compute her percent body fat. In the end no one will measure up. [rolleyes] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2002 6:59:02 AM EDT
[#33]
She's Ok, but nothing more. I suspect she is incredibly annoying to be around.
Laura Ingraham is much better... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2002 7:11:00 AM EDT
[#34]
Quoted: [url]http://www.anncoulter.org/images/webimages/gun.jpg[/url] Her? [;)] I am 27 as well, For her, age is the last thing I'd be thinking about...... [:P][img]http://www.s10forum.com/forum/images/smilies/eek2.gif[/img] [img]http://www.AzChatfield.net/Comebacks/HitIt_GW_NoMistake.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2002 7:41:37 AM EDT
[#35]
Sorry, had to vote Not Hit It. Not that Ann isn't hot, but I'm currently married to the reigning conservative hottie, thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2002 10:02:52 AM EDT
[#36]
Thanks [b]Adam_White[/b].
For those of you that don't get it: [b]This is hot:[/b] [img]www.allstarcelebrity.com/Models/Caprice_Bourret/images/caprice_bourret10.jpg[/img] [b]This is hot:[/b] [img]http://www.natalieportman.com/images/magazines/0899dolly2.jpg[/img] [b]This is hot:[/b] [img]www.absolutely.net/zetajones/cz56.jpg[/img] THIS IS NOT: [img]http://www.anncoulter.org/images/webimages/062402mic.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 6:52:12 AM EDT
[#37]
Quoted: Thanks [b]Adam_White[/b]. For those of you that don't get it: [b]This is hot:[/b] [url]www.allstarcelebrity.com/Models/Caprice_Bourret/images/caprice_bourret10.jpg[/url] [b]This is hot:[/b] [url]http://www.natalieportman.com/images/magazines/0899dolly2.jpg[/url] [b]This is hot:[/b] [url]www.absolutely.net/zetajones/cz56.jpg[/url] THIS IS NOT: [url]http://www.anncoulter.org/images/webimages/062402mic.jpg[/url] If you compare strictly physical features, you're right, but if you consider than Ann Coulter probably has more brains in her left ovary than all three of these babes have in their collective skulls, you'll understand that the pillow talk would probably be just as arousing as the "act" itself. I'd do all four for fun. I'd MARRY Ann, and do her for the rest of my life! (And probably have all sorts of fun, too!) All I know is, her hubby's a lucky guy! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 7:35:19 AM EDT
[#38]
Quoted: If you compare strictly physical features, you're right, but if you consider than Ann Coulter probably has more brains in her left ovary than all three of these babes have in their collective skulls, you'll understand that the pillow talk would probably be just as arousing as the "act" itself. True....however, the question placed before this esteemed committee is whether or not one would 'hit' Mrs. Coulter, the subject in question. Which equates to what would be termed a 'no-strings-attached boff'. Now, if I were to be involved in such an event, I must apologize but when 'pulling up to dat bumper and smacking da monkey', I'm not overtly concerned whether or not said parter is a card carrying member of MENSA. Also, high intellectual quotient doesn't always equal 'sultry sex kitten'....so quality 'pillow talk' is not an inherint trait..... I find I must side with the minority here, considering the specifics of the question. There are many others higher on my list of 'hit it'. Now, were the question posed utilizing the concept of 'mutual relationship', or similar terminology, that would be a definite yes! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 7:55:10 AM EDT
[#39]
OK, I just re-read the original post to verify and, sure enough, there was no rating disclaimer there. Simple question. Yes or no. Not "well, I know alot better looking women...". Simply put, is she attractive enough to "hit" or not.
Damn straight. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 8:16:43 AM EDT
[#40]
Garheadjr,
Most people don't read the post they just start making comments.[:O] She is a heck of a lot better looking than what most guys "take home with them at 2 AM"![BD] Big(ToHitItOrNotToHitIt?ThatIsTheQuestion!)DOZER66 |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 9:43:42 AM EDT
[#41]
Quoted: She is a heck of a lot better looking than what most guys "take home with them at 2 AM"![BD] Big(ToHitItOrNotToHitIt?ThatIsTheQuestion!)DOZER66 Hit it! There is no question! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 10:11:02 AM EDT
[#42]
Zonan, I also am a college student, and I think your standards are ridiculously high. Is she the most beautiful woman in the world? I think we can safely say no. Are there many women more attractive than her on campus? Absolutely. But when you get right down to the heart of the matter, even though she is more than twice my age, I would still do her. Probably twice. [:P]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 10:30:17 AM EDT
[#43]
My personal opinion is that zonan has never hit anything, except maybe himself. [rolleyes]
Here is one lovely lady: [img]http://www.anncoulter.org/images/webimages/annreagan.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 11:21:33 AM EDT
[#44]
Let me just say that I'd...
[b]knock the bottom out of it[/b][+]:D] but I'd bring a tube of Neosporin for the scratch and bite marks I'd leave with![BD] |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2002 11:34:08 AM EDT
[#45]
I tell you guys the truth as my dear wife looks on.........yes I would.........[b]ouch![/b]
I mean I would not[BD] |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/1/2002 4:35:44 PM EDT
[#46]
When I was 18-22 and in college at U of A, there were PLENTY of better looking women there. Also, when I was that young, I would have agreed that she looked old to me.
Don't worry, that all clears up with age. The older you get, the better the older women look (not "old" women though). I my self, at age 41, thinks she's a hottie. Maybe when I'm 80, some 70 year old women will look good to me..... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/1/2002 5:11:46 PM EDT
[#47]
Repeatedly
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/1/2002 8:47:59 PM EDT
[#48]
I'm bringing my baseball glove to catch it coming out the other end!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/2/2002 8:50:51 AM EDT
[#49]
Quoted: Quoted: If you compare strictly physical features, you're right, but if you consider than Ann Coulter probably has more brains in her left ovary than all three of these babes have in their collective skulls, you'll understand that the pillow talk would probably be just as arousing as the "act" itself. True....however, the question placed before this esteemed committee is whether or not one would 'hit' Mrs. Coulter, the subject in question. Which equates to what would be termed a 'no-strings-attached boff'. Now, if I were to be involved in such an event, I must apologize but when 'pulling up to dat bumper and smacking da monkey', I'm not overtly concerned whether or not said parter is a card carrying member of MENSA. Also, high intellectual quotient doesn't always equal 'sultry sex kitten'....so quality 'pillow talk' is not an inherint trait..... I find I must side with the minority here, considering the specifics of the question. There are many others higher on my list of 'hit it'. Now, were the question posed utilizing the concept of 'mutual relationship', or similar terminology, that would be a definite yes! I started the thread, I get to set the specifics. Actually, I did not set any. It's up to you to determine if you would. If some consider political ideology and intelligence to be a factor, then it is part of THEIR specifics. If looks alone is someone's lone consideration, then that is THEIR specific. Personally, even for a one night stand, I prefer to consider the ideology and intelligence factor. The question placed before the committee was, indeed, would you hit it. No more, no less. Each person factors in his own specifications. The most 'sultry sex kittens' I have been with have always been the more intelligent ones. The political ideology has not always been a factor, but similar thinking has always been a plus. I would much rather carry on a pleasant discussion in the aftermath than an argument. My question did not necessarily equate to a 'no strings attached boff'. Again, that was for each person to factor in. Besides, a one nighter doesn't always wind up a one nighter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/2/2002 8:59:19 AM EDT
[#50]
Hit It! (in Repetition)
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
