Quoted:
Quoted:
Please explain to us what problems the 9mm & .45 solve and why.
Then tell us how the .40 cannot solve those same problems yet CAN solve one that DOESN'T exist.
Please.
Thank you.
I never came close to insinuating that .40 wouldn't kill someone.
It's quite simple and I'm sure you know the answer.
It doesn't do anything 9mm can't with modern loads, and its not .45 .
It's an answer to a problem that never existed.
It was developed for Leo's who carried .38spcl and couldn't qualify with a .45. All before modern 9mm rounds were available.
And I was just joking around. Shit, I had a .40 sig for a long time.
That's a problem that did exist, and why I posed the question.
No offense meant or taken.
Wasn't meant to be personal.
I believe the .40 has a place, does some things better than the other two and maybe a couple not as well...only not sure of that last one there.
I like the idea of the 9mm in a very compact pistol.
I like the idea of a .45 SUPER in a big pistol.
I like the idea of a 10mm in either size.
I like the .40 in what I've got or might get again.
As for the OP's question, yes, I believe a GLOCK 23 is a good all-around choice.