I heard it mentioned on Fox news.  Can't find verification.  

O.k., I missed this one.
[url]http://www.jobrelatedstuff.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=144273&w=activePop[/url]

o.k., here's the story:
[url]http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20020915/1034202.asp[/url]

and here's Rush L.:

Al-Qaeda Terrorists Urge: Vote Democrat!

September 16, 2002


You've of course heard of the capture of the Buffalo Five, the Al-Qaeda cell up there at the mouth of the Erie Canal. Well, guess what we've learned about them, ladies and gentlemen? They're all registered Democrats. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Plus, they're all for gun control – except for themselves.  

The Democrats are livid that this information has been included in a story or two. They ask, "What's the relevance?" It's a convenient memory lapse, isn't it, from the Oklahoma City bombing? At that time, the president himself, Bill Clinton, looked at the mounting dead and sought to use them to tar his political opponents.

Clinton tried to tie Timothy McVeigh to certain media figures of prominence in this country. But now that these terrorists are caught with very real membership in the Democratic Party, we're told that fact should be censored. If these guys were Republicans, you know darned well it would lead every news story. Instead, it's barely reported - and the Democrats are still freaking out.

By the way, of these five terrorists, how many were Asians? How many were decrepit, old, mothball-scented seasoned citizens like Helen Thomas? None. Yet these are the kinds of people that get screened at the airports, because we can't screen those who are 99.9% of the hijackers because that would be "profiling." Does this not prove the absolute idiocy of this whole screening business?