Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 1/11/2013 8:09:24 PM EDT
Is this true?


http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=375765

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to  E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
Link Posted: 1/11/2013 8:10:03 PM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 1/11/2013 8:12:09 PM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 1/11/2013 8:12:18 PM EDT
[#3]
Interdasting...
Link Posted: 1/11/2013 8:15:46 PM EDT
[#4]
I'm not a birthed but that birth cert the White House issued looked fake as hell. Like some kid photoshopped it.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 1/11/2013 8:15:56 PM EDT
[#5]
This is just them scheduling a vote on whether to hear the case or not. If 4 justices vote to hear the case then the SC has to hear it but most cases never make it past this level of review. It would be awesome to have the SC hear the case but even if they do there is no chance they would declare zero ineligible for office. They were too chicken shit to throw out zerocare because of the can of worms it would have opened up. Obama being ruled ineligible would be an even bigger mess they would have to take on so there is no way they'd grow a pair and throw him out. Zero could admit on live TV he is ineligible and wave a Kenyan birth certificate and the SC wouldn't do a thing.
Link Posted: 1/11/2013 8:16:54 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
This is just them scheduling a vote on whether to hear the case or not. If 4 justices vote to hear the case then the SC has to hear it but most cases never make it past this level of review.


Makes sense.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top