Quoted:
My experiences with ATI have been terrible. I'll never buy another ATI product no matter what the reviews say.
I'm also not into cutting edge gaming that requires the latest and greatest card ever made, either.
Besides, the OP is specifying an i5-based system. There might be a good argument to be made for a top end video card if he were
getting an i7 based system, but not with an i5. Too limited to start with.
And, not enough RAM. I view 8 GB as a starting point. I have 24 GB in my work machine. And I don't even play games on it.
CJ
Both sides have had problems. Nvidia has been the worse of the two for the last couple years as far as single card drivers go...
A i5 3.4ghz probably means the i5-3750k, hopefully, which is basically a slightly lower speed bin of their fastest quadcore on the market...
The majority of games, at any recent monitors native resolution, are going to be way more dependent on the GPU than the CPU, aka a GPU bottleneck.
There is also no reason for 24GB on a gaming machine but I do agree that 8GB should be the baseline on any current system.
Quoted:
NVIDIA IMO. If you plan on getting Borderlands 2 the Physx is worth it. And don't let the haters get to you, it's more than just pretty flags to shoot at.
You mean the water is slightly more interactive with PhysX? Oh YAY!
PhysX is a marketing gimmick and nothing more until they actually start integrating it into gameplay.