Ever since Edward R Murrow sat on top of a building in London during the Blitz, reporters have seen their job as being close enough to get the explosions on the mic/camera or else they're not 'real' reporters. It's much more dramatic when something blows up nearby and you can tell the audience you were nearly killed (even if you weren't.)
The attacks on Gaza will happen in predictable places. People know where the Hamas installations are, at least within a few blocks. They can also tell when the Israelis are coming by simply watching the airport to see when the bombers take off and calling the news crews to say they're on their way.
Run down to the block where Abdul Kiljoosian said the IDF will attack and get some good footage.
Most of the Hamas attacks are pretty wimpy. They don't hit anything and they haven't got powerful arms.
Some retard will say that I'm suggesting the Israelis shouldn't act because of this; please STFU in advance.
It makes better television when the attack actually hits something. You need the Israelis for that. If Hamas could blow things up with any predictable display of death and destruction, they'd shoot video in Tel Aviv, too.