Posted: 8/10/2002 9:29:45 AM EDT
[#14]
Quoted: Ask Heinlein.
I was expecting so much more out his novel, Starship Troopers, given all the hoopla I had heard before I read it.
Heinlein's paradise makes you nothing more than a worker in a colony to have a voice in matters.
Way too totalitarian. View Quote I disagree. And having read just about everything Heinlein wrote, I'd say the culture in [i][u]The Moon is a Harsh Mistress[/i][/u] is probably closer to his idea of paradise than the one in [u][i]Starship Troopers[/i][/u]. I think, though, that you may have missed what I consider to be the critical passage in the entire novel (others do too, or it wouldn't be available on the web.) Read it [url=www.magma.ca/~yeti/troopers.html]here.[/url] The basic point: Man has [i]no moral instinct[/i]. He is not born with moral sense. You were not born with it, I was not -- and a puppy has none. We [i]acquire[/i] moral sense, when we do, through training, experience, and hard sweat of the mind. These unfortunate juvenile criminals were born with none, even as you and I, and they had no chance to acquire any; their experiences did not permit it. What [i]is[/i] 'moral sense'? It is an elaboration of the instinct to survive. The instinct to survive is human nature itself, and every aspect of our personalities derives from it. Anything that conflicts with the survival instinct acts sooner or later to eliminate the individual and thereby fails to show up in future generations. This truth is mathematically demonstrable, everwhere verifiable; it is the single eternal imperative controlling everything we do.
"But the instinct to survive," he had gone on, "can be cultivated into motivations more subtle and much more complex than the blind, brute urge of the individual to stay alive. Young lady, what you miscalled your 'moral instinct' was the instilling in you by your elders of the truth that survival can have stronger imperatives than that of your own personal survival. Survival of your family, for example. Of your children, when you have them. Of your nation, if you struggle that high up the scale. And so on up. A scientifically verifiable theory of morals must be rooted in the individual's instinct to survive -- [i]and nowhere else![/i] -- and must correctly describe the hierarchy of survival, note the motivations at each level, and resolve all conflicts.
"We have such a theory now; we can solve any moral problem, on any level. Self-interest, love of family, duty to country, responsibility toward the human race -- we are even developing an exact ethic for extra-human relations. But all moral problems can be illustrated by one misquotation: 'Greater love hath no man than a mother cat dying to defend her kittens.' Once you understand the problem facing that cat and how she solved it, you will then be ready to examine yourself and learn how high up the moral ladder you are capable of climbing. View Quote Heinlein insisted that he did not intend that [i]military service[/i] was the only way to achieve the right to vote, but others have shown that it sure as hell looked that way. Regardless, the point was that the only way to achieve the right to vote in that society was to prove that you had acquired a moral sense greater than devotion only to yourself. In fact, you had to prove devotion to your society. Not, I think, a bad thing.
|
|