Quoted:
I'd vote for it. Of course it is all redundant. In my opinion, it's all in the original second amendment.
View Quote
I have to disagree here, and explain why I voted "don't know" (when I'm actually now thinking I should have voted "no").
The Second Amendment states that our freedom to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The "Goose and Gander" amendment does nothing to prevent already unconstitutional infringements, nor future ones. It is simply an equality thing. And if the governments were bold enough to call the bluff, then all is lost.
So, you'd have the 2nd Amendment station that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, then 2.5 Amendment stating that infringement is okay as long as it applies equally, except to the military.
Then crime becomes rampant, the police can't cope, and the military is called in "for our safety".
I like Torf's comment on outlawing junk politicians. Just think of all the people we could employ in a dept. with that responsibility!