I'm confused:
1. (Some) people claim that the M16/M4 doesn't have the range to get the job done in Afghanistan, but then they start talking about hand to hand combat and pistol shots at 40 yards? Which is it, and where are the documented cases of H2H or CQB? Do you really want to engage at close range with the unwieldy M14, as good as it is?
2. The one-shot stop statistics that I've seen bring the 9mm within 5% of the .45, and the Taliban were not employing body armor. I'm beginning to think that this is becoming a self-perpetuating myth.
3. As far as reliability goes, I'd take the M9 over 99% of the M1911A1 pistols in the military inventory. Even NEW M1911A1 pistols will not feed as reliably as the Beretta (and I'm no Beretta fan), unless you want to spend $2500 a pop.
4. Fuck Hackworth. I've seen him on TV claiming that he only owns one pistol and nothing else. He's no authority on ANY weapon system, and he'll print any letter bashing the M16 or the 9mm. The more this guy speaks, it becomes clearer that he's only there to keep his name in the pages.