This case is not over. Not by a long shot.
The Grand Jury action means that the elected states attorney for Anne Arundel county didn’t have the stomach to criminally try a FBI agent. Why? Who knows? But he is a politician, and I suspect that he weighs every issue with a eye towards being re-elected.
It’s a rare grand jury that goes against the wishes of the states attorney.
Someone mentioned that the FBI had cleared the agent, but this story indicates that the issue is still pending.
The story below also seems to indicate that the victim has his own idea of how to achieve justice.
From the [url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16723-2002Jul2.html]WasPost[/url]
Agent Not Indicted in Shooting
“An Anne Arundel County Circuit Court grand jury decided yesterday not to indict an FBI agent in the March 1 shooting of an unarmed Pasadena man whom the agent mistook for a bank robber, State's Attorney Frank R. Weathersbee announced.
Weathersbee said the grand jury investigation answered "several important questions" about the case, including why Special Agent Christopher Braga, 35, shot and wounded Joseph Charles Schultz, 20. But Weathersbee refused to disclose what prompted the shooting, saying only, "There clearly were mistakes."
The FBI agents "seemed pretty sure this was the armed bank robber they were seeking," Weathersbee said. Schultz had nothing to do with the bank robbery.
[b]Schultz's attorney, Arnold M. Weiner, said he was pleased that the investigation is over. "That allows us to move forward with filing a civil case against Mr. Braga," Weiner said.[/b]
Rosemary Vicini, spokeswoman for the FBI's Baltimore bureau, said the FBI and Justice Department are still investigating the incident as an administrative matter. Vicini said that Braga, who previously was involved in the fatal shooting of a fugitive murder suspect in February 2000, remains on duty.”
Mike