User Panel
|
This is an awesome project. I'd love to do the same.
OP if you need any help with design or FEA let me know. I'd be happy to help. |
|
That looks awesome. What do you estimate it would cost to build without the mods you're considering? |
|
Red: Right around the same.
Jinx: Definitely. I was thinking about tossing up a Wiki to track info with a SVN repository for the models. One nice perk is you can completely build this thing in a 2 car garage. |
|
Quoted: I guess I should post pictures of the desired end state. ...snip... Oh lawdy....you gonna die. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I guess I should post pictures of the desired end state. ...snip... Oh lawdy....you gonna die. Everybody does! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess I should post pictures of the desired end state. ...snip... Oh lawdy....you gonna die. Everybody does! Just keep a high altitude so that if it does happen, you won't have to live through it. Your wiki idea sounds cool and I would very likely contribute to it. |
|
Damn you. Just ordered the plans
Aviator ETA... Need to start pricing engines and BRS systems |
|
Sounds like a -lot- of fun. I have a lot of friends into flying, some even use the ultralights. If you haven't already, investigate a parachute system for engine failure. Doubtful that you will need it but it almost makes it completely safe.
Have fun buddy. Condolences on your son.
|
|
Quoted: What's the weight capacity and range, etc? And how many hardpoints? |
|
Quoted:
What's the weight capacity and range, etc? Specs say 6' 240 lb pilot. Am sure that will vary depending on fuel load. Aviator |
|
Just FYI there are a number of ultralight clubs in the USA that routinely have meet ups where everyone flies in. I've never been to one but I hear they are awesome!!
|
|
Here are a couple for sale if anyone is interested. The first link is a complete kit that he never finished.
http://fayar.craigslist.org/for/2755928098.html http://fayar.craigslist.org/rvs/2755936255.html |
|
Wait! No one told me there would be math involved!
Seriously, Good luck on your build |
|
Quoted:
Here are a couple for sale if anyone is interested. The first link is a complete kit that he never finished. http://fayar.craigslist.org/for/2755928098.html http://fayar.craigslist.org/rvs/2755936255.html Not sure I would be too keen on completing an airplane project someone else started. If they are not willing to finish it, I would wonder what kind of shortcuts they may have made during construction... Aviator |
|
Let me know if you get it to come in within Part 103 empty weight limits. I've heard that's a challenge for most.
If you pull it off I'd be very interested in your methods. I would like to go this route, too. Good luck! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here are a couple for sale if anyone is interested. The first link is a complete kit that he never finished. http://fayar.craigslist.org/for/2755928098.html http://fayar.craigslist.org/rvs/2755936255.html Not sure I would be too keen on completing an airplane project someone else started. If they are not willing to finish it, I would wonder what kind of shortcuts they may have made during construction... Aviator What is it,something like 85% of home built aircraft started never make it into the air? There is a 1948 Ercoupe in a garage down the street from me. I have longed and lusted over it and even have the benefit of an A&P for a neighbor with a long time FAA inspector buddy. Only problem is that given how much over budget and over time my car and motorcycle restorations have been...I know better than to undertake the 10 year,$40k Ercoupe project! Great blog by another Arfcommer if you haven't happened upon it yet http://dreambuildfly.com/ |
|
You might be able to get Donald Trump to help finance the project if you can mount an MG on it and tell him you'll guard the Empire State Building to keep it free of oversized primates
(OST) |
|
I think it would be incredible to build an airplane just to mess around in.
My neighbor has built three now and I've seen him go over the house on nice summer mornings in his last one. I've toyed with the idea of building a DR1 from these guys: http://www.airdromeaeroplanes.com/index.html Realistically, it won't happen. Which is probably a good thing as I've already amassed several bowling balls to drop into a local lake from the air. |
|
Quoted:
I think it would be incredible to build an airplane just to mess around in. My neighbor has built three now and I've seen him go over the house on nice summer mornings in his last one. I've toyed with the idea of building a DR1 from these guys: http://www.airdromeaeroplanes.com/index.html Realistically, it won't happen. Which is probably a good thing as I've already amassed several bowling balls to drop into a local lake from the air. Sounds like you're a man in need of a mortar! |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I think it would be incredible to build an airplane just to mess around in. My neighbor has built three now and I've seen him go over the house on nice summer mornings in his last one. I've toyed with the idea of building a DR1 from these guys: http://www.airdromeaeroplanes.com/index.html Realistically, it won't happen. Which is probably a good thing as I've already amassed several bowling balls to drop into a local lake from the air. Sounds like you're a man in need of a mortar! Yep...mounted in an AIRPLANE! Jeez, think of the possibilities. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think it would be incredible to build an airplane just to mess around in. My neighbor has built three now and I've seen him go over the house on nice summer mornings in his last one. I've toyed with the idea of building a DR1 from these guys: http://www.airdromeaeroplanes.com/index.html Realistically, it won't happen. Which is probably a good thing as I've already amassed several bowling balls to drop into a local lake from the air. Sounds like you're a man in need of a mortar! Yep...mounted in an AIRPLANE! Jeez, think of the possibilities. When firing ordinance from an aircraft, I always prefer that it drop below my aircraft and continue well clear. Unless... You want the dubious honor of being the first pilot to shoot himself down with a mortar! vv |
|
Quoted:
When firing ordinance from an aircraft, I always prefer that it drop below my aircraft and continue well clear. Unless... You want the dubious honor of being the first pilot to shoot himself down with a mortar! vv Sounds like history in the making! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think it would be incredible to build an airplane just to mess around in. My neighbor has built three now and I've seen him go over the house on nice summer mornings in his last one. I've toyed with the idea of building a DR1 from these guys: http://www.airdromeaeroplanes.com/index.html Realistically, it won't happen. Which is probably a good thing as I've already amassed several bowling balls to drop into a local lake from the air. Sounds like you're a man in need of a mortar! Yep...mounted in an AIRPLANE! Jeez, think of the possibilities. When firing ordinance from an aircraft, I always prefer that it drop below my aircraft and continue well clear. Unless... You want the dubious honor of being the first pilot to shoot himself down with a mortar! vv As I recall, that has been done (but with cannon fire), during a test flight of one of Grumman's fighters (F11F, I think?). |
|
Quoted: Tag for 1/4 mile high club. Weird. Ultralights are single person. So he would have to self-stroke. Should be able to bring a Fleshlight. Might be able to pull it off . And could easily get to mile high status. |
|
Quoted:
Two major mods I plan on making is beefing up the LG for rough unimproved desert strip TO/LDGs, and to make the wings and elevator fold like a Kolb, as this will be stored and transported in a trailer. Remember, you are already going to be pushing the empty weight restriction as it is. That stuff should be easy enough to change out as it is all in the open and the entire aircraft will weigh less than the average Arfcom GD dweller. Just make sure you are legal to fly before you start doing things that may be unnecessary in the first place. |
|
I'm interested and have always wanted an ultralight
This will be fun to watch your build Sorry for the loss of your son. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here are a couple for sale if anyone is interested. The first link is a complete kit that he never finished. http://fayar.craigslist.org/for/2755928098.html http://fayar.craigslist.org/rvs/2755936255.html Not sure I would be too keen on completing an airplane project someone else started. If they are not willing to finish it, I would wonder what kind of shortcuts they may have made during construction... Aviator It would require some careful inspection of each component that was previously worked on, along with doing an inventory to see what parts may be missing. I knew of one "recently restored" Cessna that the owner was trying to sell, after he had hauled it home and spent a year or two working on it in his garage (including overhauling the engine), then hauled it back to the airport and put the wings back on. After having to pull the engine back apart to overhaul the cylinders (TWICE!) in the first 150 hours of flying it after his restoration, he decided to sell it and listed the work he had done on the flyer he posted at the airport. I made a mental note of the tail number, so that I could avoid getting too close to it, if I saw it on the ramp. |
|
Sorry to hear about your son.
I'm interested in seeing where this thread goes! I've always wanted to build a Zenith Air CH701 STOL Kit Plane! |
|
Rotax 447? Always have a place to land. Crappy glide ratio and low altitude means you don't have much time to find a suitable landing strip. Plus you will have a helmet fire in trying to figure wind direction+speed.
A Hexadyne P60 would be a better fit. Four-stroke boxer twin, geared. Fuel injected, uses regular pump gasoline. 98 pounds with electric starter. Yes, more expensive but the 447 has a 300 hour TBO where the P60 has at least 4 times that. |
|
Looks like fun! I used to fly trikes (Northwing Maverick) and will most likely do a rebuild of mine. (Was destroyed in a PCS, but I still have my wing, Rotax 447 and BRS750) I shoved it to the recesses of my mind, but talking to a few guys/pilots brought it all back. As much as I really enjoy shooting, I love UL flying! It's worse than BRD. I need to get back up... I hope you enjoy the building process. If you can meet up with other UL pilots, its all the more fun. If you're not already a pilot, I'd encourage you to seek out training...
On another note, I'm sorry for the loss of your son. Best wishes to you. Good luck on the build and safe flying. Please keep us posted. |
|
Quoted:
Rotax 447? Always have a place to land. Crappy glide ratio and low altitude means you don't have much time to find a suitable landing strip. Plus you will have a helmet fire in trying to figure wind direction+speed. A Hexadyne P60 would be a better fit. Four-stroke boxer twin, geared. Fuel injected, uses regular pump gasoline. 98 pounds with electric starter. Yes, more expensive but the 447 has a 300 hour TBO where the P60 has at least 4 times that. The half VW engines (VW crankcase cut down to make a two cylinder) have been around since the 1970's, weigh around 90 pounds, but the horsepower is only 35 to 40. Cheaper than the Hexadyne, and there is something to be said for simplicity in an aircraft engine. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Rotax 447? Always have a place to land. Crappy glide ratio and low altitude means you don't have much time to find a suitable landing strip. Plus you will have a helmet fire in trying to figure wind direction+speed. A Hexadyne P60 would be a better fit. Four-stroke boxer twin, geared. Fuel injected, uses regular pump gasoline. 98 pounds with electric starter. Yes, more expensive but the 447 has a 300 hour TBO where the P60 has at least 4 times that. The half VW engines (VW crankcase cut down to make a two cylinder) have been around since the 1970's, weigh around 90 pounds, but the horsepower is only 35 to 40. Cheaper than the Hexadyne, and there is something to be said for simplicity in an aircraft engine. Remember, running an engine at 100% of its output decreases TBO dramatically. This is the issue with 447 and the VW conversions. The VW designs also suffer from direct driven props, meaning plenty of noise at 3400 RPM. Designing a reduction drive is out of the question as the engine is already heavy. One of the more interesting designs of the P60 is common crank with perfectly opposed cylinders. This is done by having a double connecting rod on one cylinder. This makes the crank lighter as the rocking moment is reduced. Remote oil sump also helps with weight and trim issues. |
|
Here's my advice. Join a builder's club. Then start looking around for completed projects that flying successfully.
Before you spend a pile of money on materials. You'll be better served with a Legal Eagle. As for planned beef ups and modifications, just stop it. If you plan to fly under FAR 103, you'll have a hard enough time making weight without getting off the reservation. Your cost projection is off by 100% minimum after the real cost of materials and the tools you need are included. If you try to scrimp on tools to fab this machine, you'll most likely never get it finished. Go balls out. First thing, buy a metal cutting bandsaw. |
|
Quoted: I'd have to agree with Kieth_J on this one... I have limited understanding of 447's, but running the VW engines in an aircraft is a lot like running a computer on Windows 3.11... Crashtastic. How many times did my mom's V-Dub leave us stranded in a fucking blizzard when the engine died I can't even remember... Wool Blankets, and car emergency kits were normal in my childhood. I'd hate to have such a thing trying to keep me in the air.
Quoted: Quoted: Rotax 447? Always have a place to land. Crappy glide ratio and low altitude means you don't have much time to find a suitable landing strip. Plus you will have a helmet fire in trying to figure wind direction+speed. A Hexadyne P60 would be a better fit. Four-stroke boxer twin, geared. Fuel injected, uses regular pump gasoline. 98 pounds with electric starter. Yes, more expensive but the 447 has a 300 hour TBO where the P60 has at least 4 times that. The half VW engines (VW crankcase cut down to make a two cylinder) have been around since the 1970's, weigh around 90 pounds, but the horsepower is only 35 to 40. Cheaper than the Hexadyne, and there is something to be said for simplicity in an aircraft engine. Remember, running an engine at 100% of its output decreases TBO dramatically. This is the issue with 447 and the VW conversions. The VW designs also suffer from direct driven props, meaning plenty of noise at 3400 RPM. Designing a reduction drive is out of the question as the engine is already heavy. One of the more interesting designs of the P60 is common crank with perfectly opposed cylinders. This is done by having a double connecting rod on one cylinder. This makes the crank lighter as the rocking moment is reduced. Remote oil sump also helps with weight and trim issues. |
|
Quoted:
As for planned beef ups and modifications, just stop it. If you plan to fly under FAR 103, you'll have a hard enough time making weight without getting off the reservation. Word. Weight is your enemy. 254 pounds (empty) is the max, IIRC. That's not a lot. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.