User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:17:07 PM EDT
[#1]
What do you expect out of a crappy police department who wants to cover their ass. And they can get away with it in liberal King County.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:19:36 PM EDT
[#2]
To protect and serve (PUKE).
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:28:44 PM EDT
[#3]
Dirty cops and corrupt politicians.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:32:12 PM EDT
[#4]
A suit for a declaratory judgment is not the same as suing someone for money damages. They are asking the court for a legal opinion before they act.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:35:42 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Dirty cops and corrupt politicians. Understatement. What are they hiding? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:38:15 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
A suit for a declaratory judgment is not the same as suing someone for money damages. They are asking the court for a legal opinion before they act. Sounds like they've got something to hide. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:45:16 PM EDT
[#7]
Just when I thought SPD was at rock bottom....NOPE...wow, just fucking wow.
In other news... SPD officer kills self after drug arrest. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:54:47 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
A suit for a declaratory judgment is not the same as suing someone for money damages. They are asking the court for a legal opinion before they act. "The City further seeks injunctive relief under RCW 42.56.540 enjoining the release of copies of the subject in-car videos to the public by a law enforcement agency subject to this section until final disposition of any criminal or civil litigation which arises from the events which were recorded." i agree with your statement that it's different. But what they are asking is criminal imho. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 4:57:47 PM EDT
[#9]
interesting....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:00:40 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Just when I thought SPD was at rock bottom....NOPE...wow, just fucking wow. In other news... SPD officer kills self after drug arrest. I guess you don't realize the integrity of the other officers to actually do something about the problem cop and not conceal his acts. Instead of supporting the good cops, you slam the entire agency because of one idiot even THEY (other cops) didn't support. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:15:40 PM EDT
[#11]
The CHIEF of POLICE needs to take the responsibility for the DEPT's FAILURE. Mind you that he's been at the job since May 7, 2009 (as the interim chief) and officially since Aug. 16, 2010. And, he has also been the Deputy Chief overseeing the Operations Bureau (just prior to being the CHIEF). So, no doubt, he is familiar (or should be) with the goings on, at the patrol officer's level.
Aloha, Mark |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:17:35 PM EDT
[#12]
I don't understand, what does this thread have to do with Christians?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:19:37 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted: I don't understand, what does this thread have to do with Christians? I lol'ed, literally. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:19:44 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just when I thought SPD was at rock bottom....NOPE...wow, just fucking wow. In other news... SPD officer kills self after drug arrest. I guess you don't realize the integrity of the other officers to actually do something about the problem cop and not conceal his acts. Instead of supporting the good cops, you slam the entire agency because of one idiot even THEY (other cops) didn't support. Have you been watching the track record of SPD over the past 2 years? Maybe if there was more evidence of them policing their own, I would have a different opinion. Instead all I find is ass covering. SPD arrested one of their own because he was corrupt. Good, thats a step in the right direction. That doesnt mean that all the shit that has been uncovered is any less fucked up. Now, I will also note that I have had a good amount of interaction with SPD and have never seen anything but professional conduct. I honestly do hope that SPD turns themselves around. Like I said I interact with them quite a bit and want nothing more than them to be the envy of police forces across the nation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:22:06 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
A suit for a declaratory judgment is not the same as suing someone for money damages. They are asking the court for a legal opinion before they act. "The City further seeks injunctive relief under RCW 42.56.540 enjoining the release of copies of the subject in-car videos to the public by a law enforcement agency subject to this section until final disposition of any criminal or civil litigation which arises from the events which were recorded." i agree with your statement that it's different. But what they are asking is criminal imho. Good pick up, thank you for explaining that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/5/2012 5:22:28 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted: Quoted: I don't understand, what does this thread have to do with Christians? I lol'ed, literally.  |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
