The Supreme Court has stated in the past that they will not get involved in the internal workings of the congress in how they vote or legislate in regards on how bills get voted on. that being said, since the Senate was still in "session" and Obama proceeded in sitting members to the NLRB and the new consumer protection bureau; if this goes to the Supreme Court hears this case and rules that the Senate was not really in session and this was a ruse to prevent Obama from sitting the foresaid members to the NLRB and the CPA and ruled that the senate was actually not in session, and allows that the members are seated would this open the door to attack the Hughes amendment to be invalid since the vote was not correctly entered into the congressional record and was not actually passed?