User Panel
In before Madcap72. Last week he was contemplating rigging up a MOE hanguard/grip and a UBR for his Thompson...
|
|
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way.
Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. |
|
Oh, my.
That was a very nice display. The biggest surprise I ever had regarding Thompson's was how HEAVY they were. |
|
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06.
|
|
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. The barrel looks too small to be 45 cal as well. Very nice. |
|
|
Someday I will own a Thompson. And 2 625 revolvers. And I will ask people to call me Earl.
|
|
Quoted: I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Agreed. The M1 is my favorite version. Elegant simplicity. |
|
Quoted: Oh, my. That was a very nice display. The biggest surprise I ever had regarding Thompson's was how HEAVY they were. I'm pretty sure they have a lighter weight model out now - I've been looking at these recently. |
|
Very cool display, OP.
Quoted:
Someday I will own a Thompson. And 2 625 revolvers. And I will ask people to call me Earl. Your style. I like it. I just got a few M.H.I. Smiley patches. |
|
Quoted:
The full wood one looks sort of sci-fi to me. This is the one I am curious about as well. I didn't even know they had made a 30-06 model. These guys are a local club I think I might try and find out when they are doing another show. I could take a real camera next time. |
|
|
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... |
|
I thought this had something to do with Fred Thompsons wife!?!?
|
|
Quoted: In before Madcap72. Last week he was contemplating rigging up a MOE hanguard/grip and a UBR for his Thompson... Phhht, now I'm not even going to post because of that to render your "In before" comment moot... ....DAMMIT |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. |
|
|
Quoted:
Oh, my. That was a very nice display. The biggest surprise I ever had regarding Thompson's was how HEAVY they were. And therein lies the magic. The weight counterbalances the recoil almost perfectly, so when shooting full auto, they just sort of hang there almost like they're weightless. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. Either way, do want |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. Either way, do want Wiki says Model 1919's came in multiple calibers, .45 ACP, .22, .32 ACP, .38 ACP, and 9mm. BSA Thompsons were built in Britian and France, buit to fire 9mm or 7.63 Mauser. |
|
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. ...ya know how I know you're gay?? |
|
|
Quoted:
The full wood one looks sort of sci-fi to me. It's also not a Thompson either....it's a Hyde M2. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, I'm the opposite. '21's and '28's (Or a '28 OVERSTAMP [got both ]) just look great to me and the M1's not so much.
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/treadhead/DSC_0074.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/treadhead/Thompson40.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v239/treadhead/DSC_0066.jpg fap,fap,fap,fap,fap......Colt 1921 is the flat best looking SMG ever.fap,fap,fap |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Middle picture (long barrel) notice the length of the ejection port and the travel length for the operating handle, and length of mag well opening. If I am not mistaken, this may be one of the test guns made in 30-06. I thought they tested some in .30 Carbine as well... I think that is a .30 carbine model. action is nowhere near long enough for '06. Either way, do want Wiki says Model 1919's came in multiple calibers, .45 ACP, .22, .32 ACP, .38 ACP, and 9mm. BSA Thompsons were built in Britian and France, buit to fire 9mm or 7.63 Mauser. 1919's don't have buttstocks or sights. I agree with the 30 carbine prototype. |
|
I don't care how heavy they are, or that there are better options available; the Thompson line of SMG's are fucking beautiful.
|
|
Quoted:
Someday I will own a Thompson. And 2 625 revolvers. And I will ask people to call me Earl. Stephen Hunter sees what you did there. |
|
I fired a Thompson four years ago, and was amazed at how accurately I could shoot it.
The heft and mass of the weapon makes felt recoil practically nil. |
|
So what's the thoughts on a Auto Ordnance modern 1928? I have one and love it. |
|
Quoted: So what's the thoughts on a Auto Ordnance modern 1928? I have one and love it. Is it pre or post Khar arms? |
|
Quoted:
Very cool display, OP. Quoted:
Someday I will own a Thompson. And 2 625 revolvers. And I will ask people to call me Earl. Your style. I like it. I just got a few M.H.I. Smiley patches. Where did you get the smiley face patches? I want to buy some. |
|
Quoted:
So what's the thoughts on a Auto Ordnance modern 1928? I have one and love it. The one I shot ran great..even with a 100 rd XX drum. Same drum wouldn't work in my AO 1927A1 though. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what's the thoughts on a Auto Ordnance modern 1928? I have one and love it. Is it pre or post Khar arms? Is Khar making post 86 1928's? |
|
Quoted: I've had a couple including an early "A5" (Not the new ones!) that I threw up on the table at shows to get folks over and I "think"So what's the thoughts on a Auto Ordnance modern 1928? I have one and love it. that they're OK. Of course, I've been exposed to "machine gun books.com" (That's full of 60-70yr old something guys that were buying '21's from J Curtis Earl in the 60's and 70's for what we pay for satellite TV every 6 months and think that the AO's (Except for the VERY,VERY early guns) and the KA's are shit but, I still like 'em. I AM glad to see that they've gone to a more "correct" actuator lately though. |
|
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. I've shot both and still prefer the M1 style. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. Its the Blish block action. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a Thompson M1 (or M1A1) in a bad way. Not a big fan of the 1928 style personally. Trust me if you ever shot a 1928 you would prefer it over the M1 series. I own both types and rarely take the M1A1s out, I nearly always grab the 1928A1 when headed to the range. I've shot both and still prefer the M1 style. Understand. Shooting full auto Thompsons on a regular basis might give you a different opinion. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Very cool display, OP. Quoted:
Someday I will own a Thompson. And 2 625 revolvers. And I will ask people to call me Earl. Your style. I like it. I just got a few M.H.I. Smiley patches. Where did you get the smiley face patches? I want to buy some. http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/buy-stuff/ |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.