[red]Turns out no further reports because no further story.[/red]
Quite convenient for ya, Eric. What did ya expect?
[b]Is this the FBI that got caught lying and manufacturing/withholding evidence in the Randy Weaver/Ruby Ridge case, the same FBI responsible for the murder of Randy's wife[/b]?
[b]Would this be the same FBI which was responsible for the death of women and children at Waco, (oh yea, that’s right you think they burned themselves up). This wouldn’t be the FBI who carted away all of the evidence at Waco according to reports by our own Texas Rangers. The FBI who knew they'd have a real nightmare trying to explain the 50 caliber bullet holes in the roof of the Davidian compound testified to in San Antonio, Texas during that farce of a trial. The trial in which the judge in the case retrieves a dropped weapons charge and re-instates it when the jury find the Davidians on trial NOT GUILTY. Then turns around sends them to jail on that dropped weapons charge for 30 years when the maximum penalty for the charge was 10-15 years[/b].
[b]This wouldn’t by any chance be the same FBI caught red-handed altering and destroying evidence in the Oklahoma Bombing Case[/b].
[b] Or the FBI which used fraud to manufacture testimony in the Vincent Foster case[/b].
[b]Couldn’t possibly be the same FBI that was all hot and bothered to find the Arab sender of the Anthrax Letters but lost interest when the prime suspect turned out not to be an Arab, etc. etc. etc…….. ad nausium[/b].
[green]But the FBI said last night it had taken a pass on the case, handing it over to immigration officials after further tests for explosives.
"All were negative," said FBI spokeswoman Melissa Mallon.[/green]
This is the FBI your willing to believe, boy your one trusting soul Hun.
IMHO, anyone who takes anything the FBI says at face value is an idiot or a government shill, take your pick.
[red]According to a brief report in the Jerusalem Post, (www.jpost.com) more complete testing at the FBI labs showed the residue to be diesel fuel.[/red]
[b] Funny the reports in the Post Intelligencer said a law enforcement source told them that the dog and the first round of tests may have picked up nothing more than residue left by a cigarette lighter[/b]. Which is it?
[blue]The specific claim is made that residue from the trucks cigarette lighter confused the tests for TNT and RDX. That doesn't explain why the trained bomb sniffing dog, who surely knows the difference between explosives and cigarettes (else he would false-positive every smoker, ashtray, and convenience store he came across) gave the first indications of explosives in the truck that led to the tests in the first place. Likewise, were the chemical tests unable to discriminate between tobacco and TNT/RDX, which are chemically quite different from tobacco combustion products, they would give false positive results for every vehicle ever tested in which smokers had ever ridden. Given the likelihood of finding tobacco residues in any car, such tests would have to be designed to tell the difference.[/blue]
Unlike you Hun, stories and re-cantations like this make me very suspicious, of course I’m NOT nearly as trusting as the know-it-all HUN.
Mike