How do liberals incrementally take control over society?


[b]"[u]The Formula[/u]:"[/b]

[b]Step 1)[/b] Identify an aspect of human behavior that you want to either subvert (as being harmful) or that you want to "normalize".

[b]Step 2)[/b] Observe the phenomenon. Examine patterns of behavior. Identify the major groups of people who support and oppose such behavior. Take names. Trace their affiliations - especially useful for steps 9 & 10.

[b]Step 3)[/b] Classify supporters and opposers according to race, sex, socioeconomic status, ideology, education and traditional "victimhood-status".

[b]Step 4)[/b] If the behavior is predominantly in white, male, heterosexual, middle-upper-class, conservative persons - assign that behavior as being "Harmful". If the behavior is predominantly in non-white, female, homo/bi/transexual/transgender, poor, liberal, dependant persons - assign that behavior to be "Normalized".

[b]Step 5)[/b] Conduct self-fulfilling (yet still "peer"-reviewed) research that highlights and exaggerates the flaws, detriments and damage caused by the behavior you previously slated as being "Harmful" or that highlights and exaggerates the benefits and "fairness" of the behavior you slated to be "Normalized".

[b]Step 6)[/b] Publish said "research" and use the media to highly publicize it and keep it at the forefront of public discourse.

[b]Step 7)[/b] Select a few isolated "common-man" cases in the media or, if necessary, construct a few examples to bring emotional elements into the debate and disperse public discussion down to the "grass-roots" level.

[b]Step 8)[/b] Seek out and elevate popular celebrities to further the agenda of either denegrating or normalizing the behavior in question.

[b]Step 9)[/b] Extinguish any refuting studies by cutting off their funding, attacking the motives of the researcher, and, if necessary, find ANY minor discrepency or technical/procedural error to discredit the work. Smear, confuse and obfuscate the issue.

[b]Step 10)[/b] Discredit and destroy the reputation of any individuals who oppose you. They must be seen by the public as "oppressive", "close-minded", "mean-spirited" and "out-of-touch". *This is a crucial point to the success of your efforts.

[b]Step 11)[/b] Use your "research" to lobby friends in Gov't for new legislation to either punish the "harmful" behaviors or reward the "normalized" behaviors.

[b]Step 12)[/b] Use the public schools to indoctrinate minds of children with your now "widely-accepted" dogma.

[b]Step 13)[/b] Repeat step 1.

It's in every newspaper.
It's recited by every talking head.
It's between the lips of every liberal Democ[b]rat[/b].
It hits you right in the face all day long.

We've just been desensitized to it so much now we don't even notice it.

I hadn't heard of this, but I found it on Amazon. Looks very enlightening. Thanks [b]raf[/b]

[url=http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a2c81004877.htm]Rules for Radicals[/url] from a Free Republic thread.

Where's the step about getting lots of hot sluts involved in "the cause" to bring guys into the fold??

We're leaving that to you, Achmed. How's your pimp-hand?

Yep. Just another [b]Macallan[/b] "Original" for you guys here. [;)]

Hope you liked it.

I enjoyed it [:D]

Outstanding!

Maybe you have some ideas on the antidote to this poisonous formula?  A response?  Nice to have typed an theory, but how about some original counters?

So I pose a question and provide a detailed answer. And yet you can't do anything but sit there dumbfaced, hand stuck out, waiting for me to give you even more?

This is a DISCUSSION board, not a lecture hall.

What - do I have to do ALL your thinking for you ? [%|]

Can't you rub a couple brain cells together and come up with even a half-intelligent response or suggestion on how to counteract liberalism on your own??

Sorry bub, it's nice that you managed to bang out a response, but what tiny morsel of insight did YOU add to this thread?




BTW, [;)]