Quoted:
It's the law, but the ATF doesn't have to interpret "sporting purpose" as it is doing so now. It's taking an absurd position regarding what "sporting" means.
Thus, the source of the frustration is two fold:
1.) The ATF's interpretation of "sporting" is driven by its hostility to the 2nd Amendment. Thus, it attributes absurd meanings to "sporting."
2.) The clause is unconstitutional.
Number 1, we can do something about. Number 2, we can't, at least not in time for this proposal to take effect. So what are we gonna do about the former? Several requests for help forming arguments for a response to the ATF, on this board, have been posted, and two out of three of all replies, are "It's Unconstitutional!"
I hate to be a nattering nabob, but if we can't set aside that fight for another day, we're going to lose these Saigas, and anything else resembling them.