User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:57:39 AM EDT
[#1]
Oh-Oh
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:57:46 AM EDT
[#2]
In on one
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:57:51 AM EDT
[#3]
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:58:12 AM EDT
[#4]
heheh nice.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:58:18 AM EDT
[#5]
Fun!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:58:21 AM EDT
[#6]
Yeah baby!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:58:26 AM EDT
[#7]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:58:31 AM EDT
[#8]
Did he issue an injunction?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:59:01 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted: +1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:59:25 AM EDT
[#10]
no becouse it dont kick in 2014
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:59:39 AM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Quoted:
+1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 10:59:57 AM EDT
[#12]
woot
(Capital 'W' as in Woot! is reserved for that ruling from SCOTUS) |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:00:34 AM EDT
[#13]
fuck obama
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:01:17 AM EDT
[#14]
This made my monday much, much better.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:01:21 AM EDT
[#15]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:01:33 AM EDT
[#16]
So what else needs to be done to kill this obamacare shit for good? Did todays ruling really do much?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:01:51 AM EDT
[#17]
This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:00 AM EDT
[#18]
AMERICA, FUCK YEAH!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:22 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ-NEgeFQOzmP-UHIMNoQjFEOlkZ7GQbTvDt5o8q4xSQTeEjtxx&t=1 Alright, What the blues blazes is THAT? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:24 AM EDT
[#20]
Just heard it on the radio. BOOM.
 So now it will be appealed until it is constitutional magically.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:29 AM EDT
[#21]
was there any other correct response?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:37 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on. One piece at a time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:42 AM EDT
[#23]
Can't wait until the SCOTUS smack down.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:02:47 AM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on. Without the mandate, the rest falls apart. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:03:01 AM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on. I believe the way the bill was passed means that if one part of it is unconstitutional, the whole thing is. (I forget the technical name for that). |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:03:12 AM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ-NEgeFQOzmP-UHIMNoQjFEOlkZ7GQbTvDt5o8q4xSQTeEjtxx&t=1 Alright, What the blues blazes is THAT? A REAL President doing a chest-bump |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:03:41 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted: This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on. Upholding severability. Because the individual mandate is stricken, the whole bill is GONE! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:03:45 AM EDT
[#28]
sweet
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:03:46 AM EDT
[#29]
Judge Hudson Vinson stated if one part is unconstitutional the entire bill is unconstitutional. Haha.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:04:11 AM EDT
[#30]
Poor judge. He had such a promising career ahead of him.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:04:32 AM EDT
[#31]
Awesome!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:05:32 AM EDT
[#32]
I'm looking for the "like" button!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:05:37 AM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on. I believe the way the bill was passed means that if one part of it is unconstitutional, the whole thing is. (I forget the technical name for that). Correct. It lacks severability clauses. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:05:42 AM EDT
[#34]
This is awesome but as I pointed out in the locked dupe we are 2n2 at this point.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:06:06 AM EDT
[#35]
Yes. The personal mandate was considered inremovable from the whole Act––so it is thrown out in its entirety. Next stop SCOTUS.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:06:13 AM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Just heard it on the radio. BOOM. So now it will be appealed until it is constitutional magically. Ask rahm, he will tell you how it is done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:06:24 AM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:06:58 AM EDT
[#38]
Sweet.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:07:00 AM EDT
[#39]
He must not know the constitution is a living breathing document. He needs to be sent to re-education a.s.a.p!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:07:35 AM EDT
[#40]
Quoted:
This is awesome but as I pointed out in the locked dupe we are 2n2 at this point. Sure, but one of those cases is 26 states against the Federal Government. That is a really big deal for the Supreme Court. Not a Constitutional argument, but a realpolitik consideration. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:07:59 AM EDT
[#41]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:08:07 AM EDT
[#42]
Quoted: Can't wait until the SCOTUS smack down. why would you assume they would smack it down? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:08:07 AM EDT
[#43]
You better hope this gets the entire thing killed then.
The only thing worse than Obamacare would be Obamacare without the individual mandate. I don't think the mandate is severable, but what do I know. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:08:15 AM EDT
[#44]
In.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:08:23 AM EDT
[#45]
Where's that clip of Zero saying, "I wish they would run on the repeal platform, I'd like to see them try"?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:08:28 AM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
Judge Hudson stated if one part is unconstitutional the entire bill is unconstitutional. Haha. Hudson didn't. Vinson just did. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:08:44 AM EDT
[#47]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:09:12 AM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is only the individual mandate, not the whole shootin' match. Keep your pants on. I believe the way the bill was passed means that if one part of it is unconstitutional, the whole thing is. (I forget the technical name for that). Just so. That 'poison pill' got added to it in the rush. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:09:13 AM EDT
[#49]
in on one
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2011 11:10:52 AM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Judge Hudson stated if one part is unconstitutional the entire bill is unconstitutional. Haha. Hudson didn't. Vinson just did. Thanks I'll go back and correct my statement. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
