Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 9/12/2010 7:04:38 AM EDT
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-09-11/obama-visits-could-help-dems-hold-the-house-scholar-says/




       


The Democrats Can Win the House


       
       




           



               





by Ben Crair

           






Deep
in red state country, the last Democratic optimist has a model that
shows Democrats keeping a slim majority. Ben Crair on how to pull it
off.







Two months after White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs let slip
that Republicans could take over the House of Representatives in
November, the Democrats’ prospects have only grown bleaker: No one seems
to think that they have a prayer. Nate Silver announced Friday that Republicans have a two-thirds chance of gaining control of the House. Charlie Cook says
the Republicans will win "well north of the 39 seats needed for the
House to flip,” while, at a recent gathering of the American Political
Science Association, several academics predicted Republican gains of 50 seats.









But not everyone has written off the Democrats just yet. Deep in the
heart of red country, Rob Mellen, an assistant professor of political
science and public administration at Mississippi State University, has
something that offers liberals a flicker of hope: a model that shows
Democrats keeping a slim majority of the House of
Representatives—between 224 and 226 of the House’s 435 seats.





Mellen’s isn’t the only model that shows the Democrats holding on to
the House. But unlike the others in this category, which look mostly at
slow-changing economic fundamentals, Mellen’s model shows that President
Obama himself can make a difference between now and Election Day.
Mellen looks at the impact of presidential campaign appearances on
behalf of House candidates in midterm elections. With just two
exceptions—George W. Bush in 2002 and Bill Clinton in 1998—the party of
the sitting president has lost House seats in every midterm election
since FDR’s Democrats picked up seats in 1934. "I’m looking to see if
making these campaign appearances can actually help to mitigate these
losses,” Mellen says.




Conventional wisdom holds that they do not. "To help Democrats in the fall, Obama may stay away,” was the headline
of a New York Times article in July. And yet Mellen’s model shows
otherwise. When the president visits a toss-up race in a congressional
district, his candidate goes on to win the election about 50 percent of
the time; when the president sits out a toss-up race, his party’s
candidate wins just 35 percent of the time.









The improvement has to do with the so-called enthusiasm gap. The dire
predictions for the Democrats in November don’t necessarily assume a
defection of voters from the Democratic Party to the GOP. Rather,
Republican voters, riled up by being out of power, are more likely to
turn out in the midterms; Democrats, resting on their laurels after the
2008 landslide, are much more likely to sit this one out.



A presidential visit to a toss-up race, according to Mellen, inspires
some Democrats who would otherwise skip the polls to actually vote.
Voter turnout always declines from presidential-year to midterm
elections, but midterm toss-up races visited by the president see a
lower decline in turnout than expected. Essentially, a visit from the
president helps his party to narrow the enthusiasm gap that
traditionally favors his opponents.









Not everyone is on board with Mellen’s findings. "It’s a stretch to
say this factor is enough to keep the House Democratic,” says Larry
Sabato of the University of Virginia. "Most models are suggesting a
strong GOP victory.” Michael Lewis-Beck of the University of Iowa says
"Visits seem to help little, if at all.” And Mellen will be the first to
admit that his model isn’t rosy for Democrats: It still predicts they
will drop 30-something seats.









"If Obama’s success rate is roughly the same as his predecessors… the Democrats would hold the House,” Mellen says.









What Mellen’s model does do is offer the groundwork for a plan for
President Obama and the Democrats to minimize their losses. With the
House likely to be split somewhere near 50-50 between the parties, a
concerted campaign effort by President Obama could save for the
Democrats the handful of seats needed to retain a bare majority. A huge
number of races this year are counted as statistical toss-ups—45,
according to The Cook Political Report. If Obama visits half of those,
he’ll steal the title of most active campaigner from George W. Bush, who
hit up 22 districts in 2002. He’s unlikely to be as successful as Bush,
who won 19 of those races, but the recent proliferation of polling data
should help his cause. For one thing, it’s already kept the Democrats
from being caught off-guard like they were by the Republican Revolution
in 1994. And it at least makes it easier for the Obama team to choose
the districts he’s most likely to save. "If his campaign team and
strategists work things properly, they’ll be able to put the president
where he matters most,” Mellen says. "If Obama’s success rate is roughly
the same as his predecessors… the Democrats would hold the House.”









Whether Obama and his team effectively use polling data to intervene
in toss-up districts remains to be seen; The New York Times article from
July seemed to suggest they wouldn’t. "I think much of the House is in a
wait-and-see mode to see how helpful the president will be,” Rep.
Elijah E. Cummings, (D-MD) told the Times. "He has to come into these
districts with the same gusto and the same sense of hope that he came
into the election with.”





 
 
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:14:03 AM EDT
[#1]
1)   Focus on the close races, ignore the rest

2)   Dirty tricks

3)   October Surprise
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:21:39 AM EDT
[#2]
Win the House?  They already have it.  Don't they mean hold the House?  And I doubt they will.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:26:48 AM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
1)   Focus on the close races, ignore the rest
2)   Dirty tricks
3)   October Surprise


How many are close?
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:30:46 AM EDT
[#4]
The Republican Party is still being run by people who think that George W. Bush was a social and fiscal conservative.  These are the same people who were positive that what American needed in 1976 was more Gerald Ford (instead of that crackpot Ronald Reagan).  Don't underestimate the ability of liberal country club Republicans to screw up.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:33:16 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
1)   Focus on the close races, ignore the rest
2)   Dirty tricks
3)   October Surprise


And interesting idea that has been floated for about nine months now has been the option of "forgiving" the underwater part of any loan held by Fannie and Freddy.  That will cause all sorts of problems, in most case the minute the paperwork is signed when everyone who could not sell because their home was underwater is now suddenly able to sell, but it may happen.  And that could get a lot of people to the polls to vote for Obama.  Afterward, it would be a goat rodeo of epic proportions, but I am kind of OK with that.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:42:24 AM EDT
[#6]
Getting the libs out of office is surely not guaranteed. It's going to take work to root them out. What's worse is some of the R options they have to be replaced with are hardcore rhinos. Boner as speaker isn't going to be particularly good either as he's a big contributor to the problems were in right now.

Even if the republicrats win were still screwed.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:48:27 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Getting the libs out of office is surely not guaranteed. It's going to take work to root them out. What's worse is some of the R options they have to be replaced with are hardcore rhinos. Boner as speaker isn't going to be particularly good either as he's a big contributor to the problems were in right now.

Even if the republicrats win were still screwed.


screwed I can handle
its anally raped witha  chain saw the past 2 years that is getting annoying.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:49:49 AM EDT
[#8]
Is Acorn still in play?
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:51:22 AM EDT
[#9]
Left leaning & middle left (On social issues ) posters here have to get over Bush and hold their nose & vote GOP because to do otherwise in this Midterm election only empowers Socialist leaning Far Left & Democrats who have empowered them .
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:51:55 AM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Is Acorn still in play?


Something similar –– see my Fannie and Freddy post above.  The idea would be to distract and defuse the conservatives and to energize the liberals just enough to keep the balance of power from shifting.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:55:28 AM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Left leaning & middle left (On social issues ) posters here have to get over Bush and hold their nose & vote GOP because to do otherwise in this Midterm election only empowers Socialist leaning Far Left & Democrats who have empowered them .


I don't think that it's the libertarians and anti-Christianity people who won't turn out to vote that's the issue.  The conservatives that Bush did everything possible to discourage have to turn out, and Obama is making that happen pretty well.  The question is whether he can both increase the Democratic turnout and discourage the conservative turnout.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 7:57:09 AM EDT
[#12]
This is starting to remind me of the McCain-Palin Landslide articles that were popping up in 2008.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 8:01:17 AM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Left leaning & middle left (On social issues ) posters here have to get over Bush and hold their nose & vote GOP because to do otherwise in this Midterm election only empowers Socialist leaning Far Left & Democrats who have empowered them .


I don't think that it's the libertarians and anti-Christianity people who won't turn out to vote that's the issue.  The conservatives that Bush did everything possible to discourage have to turn out, and Obama is making that happen pretty well.  The question is whether he can both increase the Democratic turnout and discourage the conservative turnout.


The only Discouragement on the Right is with the Lack of courage with some middle of the road Republicans to stand against Far Left ideals of Recent era Democrats in DC , The Middle Left & Independant leaning  voters with issues including GOP union with conservative & religeous moral majority will always be stand offish with GOP .
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 8:25:43 AM EDT
[#14]
Not only do I think that the Republicans virtually have a lock on taking back the House, and with a respectable margin,  I also think

that nobody should count out the possibility that the Republicans could take the Senate, too.





This is the Class III Senate race.  37 seats are up for election.   Of them, 20 seats are held by Democrats, but only four of those seats

are considered to be "safe" from takeover by a Republican.    So it's not impossible that up to 16 seats could change parties.



I think that no matter what happens,  at the very worst, the Democrat lead in the Senate will be cut by no less than four seats.



It will totally end any chance of anything getting railroaded through Congress without Republican cooperation.  (Thus, true bipartisanship.)





CJ






Link Posted: 9/12/2010 8:27:01 AM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Left leaning & middle left (On social issues ) posters here have to get over Bush and hold their nose & vote GOP because to do otherwise in this Midterm election only empowers Socialist leaning Far Left & Democrats who have empowered them .


I don't think that it's the libertarians and anti-Christianity people who won't turn out to vote that's the issue.  The conservatives that Bush did everything possible to discourage have to turn out, and Obama is making that happen pretty well.  The question is whether he can both increase the Democratic turnout and discourage the conservative turnout.


The only Discouragement on the Right is with the Lack of courage with some middle of the road Republicans to stand against Far Left ideals of Recent era Democrats in DC , The Middle Left & Independant leaning  voters with issues including GOP union with conservative & religeous moral majority will always be stand offish with GOP .


I think that we are talking about different things.

In any event, the GOP's lackluster support of the angry right this year has not hugely blunted the impact of Obama's amazing cascade of bad decisions in energizing the conservatives, and I think that even if the victory isn't as lopsided as I would hope, the impact of Obama's socialized medicine on the economy and the related tax regs on basically everyone (I just watched a nice fellow who works for a church-based non-profit spend eight hours with a CPA and tax adviser trying to figure out how to stay compliant with next year's regs) will lead to a much larger victory in the future.  These decisions have long tails.  The impact of making corporations shift their health care burden onto the state (with radically lower benefits and similar if not increased costs) will be seen by even stupid people as the direct result of Obama's health program.

This isn't like when Clinton was in office and it was easy to cover up things unless you were reading the American Spectator or National Review.  When Obama does wrong, it's in the Wall Street Journal the next day.  That may not help conservatives that much yet, but the impacts of Obama's legislation over the next few years will absolutely be laid at his feet.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 8:41:52 AM EDT
[#16]
THE fatal flaw of Saul Alinski's "Rules for Radicals"...the left-wing will ALWAYS tell you what they fear most...then you act on those fears. This is why "Rules for Radicals" only works until your enemy figures out your playbook, then you're toast.
Link Posted: 9/12/2010 8:44:33 AM EDT
[#17]




Quoted:

Is Acorn still in play?




Expect even more of the same voter registration fraud that occurred in '08. Now that the Panthers and SEIU have de facto immunity from any voter intimidation charges you can expect more strong-arm tactics from them. But since this election will have a much lower minority turn out, 2010 is only a dress rehearsal for the Big Show in 2012.



2012 will have the most potential for extreme registration fraud, voter intimidation and possible violence.



Link Posted: 9/12/2010 9:02:41 AM EDT
[#18]
I believe that Republicans "may" win the House but we are the ones being delusional if we think that people with common sense make up a large majority of voters.

This country is full of stupid people and crazy shits who all vote Democrat or do what thay have to do to let the Democrats in (ACORN and Lezbetarians).

It will be a rare Congressional district where the Republican candidate wins by more that 10%.



Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top